You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2010/02/09 15:11:38 UTC
[Bug 6325] New: FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Summary: FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.3.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: christian.kuehn@mcs.de
CC: mkettler_sa@verizon.net, christian.kuehn@mcs.de
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #5501 +++
FH_HAS_XID got a S/O of 0.786 in the 3.2 mass-checks but the perceptron wound
up
assigning it a score of aproximately 2.40
Is it still policy that spam rules with a S/O of under 0.80 get dropped from
the
ruleset? If so, we should consider dropping or revising this rule as it's not
living up to the standards but is causing problems.
In #5501 this rule was downscored to zero, but in 3.3.0 back to a high score:
score FH_HAS_XID 3.299 3.215 3.003 1.782 # n=2
in
# UPDATE version 903765
Why???
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Henrik Krohns <he...@hege.li> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |hege@hege.li
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Henrik Krohns <he...@hege.li> 2011-05-01 20:39:36 UTC ---
Change was propagated ok, probably long time ago. :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@issues.apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
--- Comment #11 from Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> 2010-05-30 08:53:40 EDT ---
Bug 6325: FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score - zeroing it out
Sending rules/50_scores.cf
Committed revision 949512.
I hope this is the right way to do it.
When it propagates to sa-update this can be closed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
--- Comment #7 from Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> 2010-02-12 20:45:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> I don't think anyone is yet publishing updates for 3.3.x...
Huh? Isn't this a bit of a problem?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
--- Comment #3 from Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> 2010-02-09 14:54:04 UTC ---
+1 to zeroing out or removing the rule from 3.3 and trunk
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|Libraries |Rules
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
--- Comment #2 from Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de> 2010-02-09 11:22:15 UTC ---
According to these mass-check results and bug 5501...
+1 on zeroing out the score or even plain dropping the rule entirely. For both,
the 3.3 branch and trunk.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.3.1
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jm@jmason.org
--- Comment #5 from Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> 2010-02-11 15:39:04 UTC ---
+1 to zero score in 3.3.1, removing entirely in trunk.
I don't think anyone is yet publishing updates for 3.3.x...
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
--- Comment #4 from Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> 2010-02-11 14:50:04 UTC ---
Will this be pushed to sa-update soon, long before 3.3.1?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Adam Katz <an...@khopis.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |antispam@khopis.com
--- Comment #1 from Adam Katz <an...@khopis.com> 2010-02-09 11:14:38 UTC ---
Probably one of the faults of using a genetic algorithm; too many generations
will produce a little inbreeding and some unexpected results on a few children,
too few generations will produce something immature. I think it makes perfect
sense that something like this, which hits almost no messages, fell through the
cracks.
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100208-r907584-n/FH_HAS_XID/detail
MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
0 0.0060 0.0042 0.586 0.50 3.30 FH_HAS_XID
As to how the automated processes even keep it in the published ruleset (let
alone evade the hand-set score), that's a different puzzle.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group|security |
Component|Security |Libraries
AssignedTo|security@spamassassin.apach |dev@spamassassin.apache.org
|e.org |
--- Comment #9 from Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de> 2010-03-23 17:42:26 UTC ---
Moving back off of Security, which got changed by accident during the mass
Target Milestone move.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kmcgrail@pccc.com
--- Comment #6 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> 2010-02-11 16:24:43 UTC ---
+1 to Comment 3
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
Posted by bu...@issues.apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Dr. Tilmann Bubeck <t....@reinform.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |t.bubeck@reinform.de
--- Comment #10 from Dr. Tilmann Bubeck <t....@reinform.de> 2010-04-26 03:38:50 EDT ---
This rule is critical, because every mail send through T-Online has a X-ID mail
header. As T-Online is the largest german ISP this has a big influence. A lot
of mails get a score of 3.2999 just because they come from T-Online.
More information (in german) at http://th-h.de/faq/headerfaq.php
Please either delete the rule or lower the score significantly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.