You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Kevin Jackson <fo...@gmail.com> on 2009/11/10 12:47:04 UTC
Configuring 1.4 - multi master setup?
Hi all,
We have a situation where we would like to have
1 Master server (creates the index)
1 input slave server (which receives the updated index from the master)
n slaves (which receive the updated index from the input slave server)
This is to prevent each of the n slaves polling the master server.
a: is this setup possible?
b: has anyone done anything like this, if so do you have any advice?
This is all with 1.4 so we would be using inbuilt/java replication,
not snapshooter/snappuller
Thanks,
Kev
Re: Configuring 1.4 - multi master setup?
Posted by Walter Underwood <wu...@wunderwood.org>.
If the master and slaves are separated by a WAN, sure, but Kev wants
all the slaves to go to a single repeater in order to "reduce
polling", so I doubt this is a WAN issue.
Just trying to keep the configuration simple. Only use a repeater if
you actually need it.
wunder
On Nov 10, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Walter Underwood <wunder@wunderwood.org
> > wrote:
>> Replication creates very little load on the master, so you should
>> not need
>> to have a separate machine just to handle the replication.
>>
>> Why do you think you need that?
> correct.
>
> A repeater is setup when your main master is not located in the same
> LAN
>>
>> wunder
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2009, at 5:37 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2009/11/10 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
>>> <no...@corp.aol.com>:
>>>>
>>>> see the setting up a repeater section in this page
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
>>>
>>> Doh!
>>>
>>> Sorry for the noise
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kev
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
>
Re: Configuring 1.4 - multi master setup?
Posted by Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <no...@corp.aol.com>.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Walter Underwood <wu...@wunderwood.org> wrote:
> Replication creates very little load on the master, so you should not need
> to have a separate machine just to handle the replication.
>
> Why do you think you need that?
correct.
A repeater is setup when your main master is not located in the same LAN
>
> wunder
>
> On Nov 10, 2009, at 5:37 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2009/11/10 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <no...@corp.aol.com>:
>>>
>>> see the setting up a repeater section in this page
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
>>
>> Doh!
>>
>> Sorry for the noise
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kev
>>
>
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
Re: Configuring 1.4 - multi master setup?
Posted by Walter Underwood <wu...@wunderwood.org>.
Replication creates very little load on the master, so you should not
need to have a separate machine just to handle the replication.
Why do you think you need that?
wunder
On Nov 10, 2009, at 5:37 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2009/11/10 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> <no...@corp.aol.com>:
>> see the setting up a repeater section in this page
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
>
> Doh!
>
> Sorry for the noise
>
> Thanks,
> Kev
>
Re: Configuring 1.4 - multi master setup?
Posted by Kevin Jackson <fo...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
2009/11/10 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <no...@corp.aol.com>:
> see the setting up a repeater section in this page
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
Doh!
Sorry for the noise
Thanks,
Kev
Re: Configuring 1.4 - multi master setup?
Posted by Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <no...@corp.aol.com>.
see the setting up a repeater section in this page
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Kevin Jackson <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a situation where we would like to have
> 1 Master server (creates the index)
> 1 input slave server (which receives the updated index from the master)
> n slaves (which receive the updated index from the input slave server)
>
> This is to prevent each of the n slaves polling the master server.
>
> a: is this setup possible?
> b: has anyone done anything like this, if so do you have any advice?
>
> This is all with 1.4 so we would be using inbuilt/java replication,
> not snapshooter/snappuller
>
> Thanks,
> Kev
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com