You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by "Grzegorz Kossakowski (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/08/06 13:51:59 UTC
[jira] Commented: (COCOON-2083) Allow database connections defined
as Spring beans to be used in Avalon components
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517898 ]
Grzegorz Kossakowski commented on COCOON-2083:
----------------------------------------------
See this[1] comment describing how beans should be named to work properly in Avalon components.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2106#action_12517896
> Allow database connections defined as Spring beans to be used in Avalon components
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COCOON-2083
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2083
> Project: Cocoon
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: * Cocoon Core, Blocks: Databases
> Affects Versions: 2.2-dev (Current SVN)
> Reporter: Grzegorz Kossakowski
> Assignee: Grzegorz Kossakowski
> Fix For: 2.2-dev (Current SVN)
>
>
> In thread http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.cocoon.devel/73925 we have came to conclusion that there is no way to access database connections defined as Spring beans. Since we have a lot of Avalon-managed components in Cocoon and Spring-based solutions are preferred now I think it's worth to implement a bridge that will connect both worlds.
> The idea is implement Avalon's selector (DataSourceSelector) that will gather connections defined both in Avalon and Spring way and expose all of them. New Spring-based selector will replace old one and the old one will be renamed to stay still accessible for new selector.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.