You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> on 2017/03/22 21:12:50 UTC

Wicket is #3 in the JSON perf test by TechEmpower

Hi,

Somehow Wicket finished at 3rd position at the last preview run of
TechEmpower framework tests :-)
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json

At plaintext test we are at #18:
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext

Too bad that the new MySQL JDBC driver v.6 failed at their servers,
otherwise I'd expect good results there too.
https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/2603

Wicket 7.6.0 performs ~300% better than Round 13!
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/r13-vs-r14p1.html

The improvements come from
https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/commit/54152ceb735cf63351537556aa316dfd29202af4
- custom root request mapper
- reduced the response size to the minimum


Once again the reactive frameworks are slower than the good old Wicket! :-)

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

Re: Wicket is #3 in the JSON perf test by TechEmpower

Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
Awwwwww ;-) But yes those values were just to nice to be true ;-)

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 24.03.2017 um 08:50 schrieb Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>:
> 
> It was too good to be true :-)
> 
> TechEmpower said that they've had some mistake in the way they executed the
> tests and this led to these good numbers.
> After fixing the errors the difference between round 13 and 14 are:
> 
> Framework  Test Type         Old RPS           New RPS    Change in RPS
> Old Rank   New Rank    Change in Rank
> 
> wicket           json                  328,388              339,015
>  +3.2%            39               41                       -2
> wicket           plaintext           335,404              344,897
> +2.8%            62               65                       -3
> wicket           db                     38,498                 44,699
>    +16.1%          92               83                       +9
> wicket           query                36,635                 43,500
>   +18.7%         78               65                     +13
> wicket           update              18,724                 24,017
>   +28.3%         50               35                     +15
> wicket           fortune              24,363                 23,641
>    -3.0%           76               94                      -18
> 
> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/r13-vs-r14p1.1.html
> 
> Everything looks normal!
> 
> Happy Friday! :-)
> 
> 
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> There won't be a difference.
>> There is only one page in these tests and it is stateless, i.e. it is not
>> stored.
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Martin Makundi <martin.makundi@
>> koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Would be interesting to run this performance test Wicket with speed patch
>>> #6177
>>> 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6177
>>> 
>>> 2017-03-23 15:58 GMT+02:00 Marcel Barbosa Pinto <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>>> That is really good!
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Great!
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> "New" does not mean better. :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 22.03.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <
>>>>>> martijn.dashorst@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> WOW
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>> mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Somehow Wicket finished at 3rd position at the last preview run
>>> of
>>>>>>>> TechEmpower framework tests :-)
>>>>>>>> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
>>>>>> section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> At plaintext test we are at #18:
>>>>>>>> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
>>>>>> section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Too bad that the new MySQL JDBC driver v.6 failed at their
>>> servers,
>>>>>>>> otherwise I'd expect good results there too.
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/2603
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Wicket 7.6.0 performs ~300% better than Round 13!
>>>>>>>> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/
>>>>>> r13-vs-r14p1.html
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The improvements come from
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/commit/
>>>>>> 54152ceb735cf63351537556aa316dfd29202af4
>>>>>>>> - custom root request mapper
>>>>>>>> - reduced the response size to the minimum
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Once again the reactive frameworks are slower than the good old
>>>>> Wicket!
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
>>>> http://wicketinaction.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ---------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ---------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> Marcel Barbosa Pinto
>>>> 55 11 98255 8288
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org


Re: Wicket is #3 in the JSON perf test by TechEmpower

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
It was too good to be true :-)

TechEmpower said that they've had some mistake in the way they executed the
tests and this led to these good numbers.
After fixing the errors the difference between round 13 and 14 are:

Framework  Test Type         Old RPS           New RPS    Change in RPS
 Old Rank   New Rank    Change in Rank

wicket           json                  328,388              339,015
  +3.2%            39               41                       -2
wicket           plaintext           335,404              344,897
+2.8%            62               65                       -3
wicket           db                     38,498                 44,699
    +16.1%          92               83                       +9
wicket           query                36,635                 43,500
   +18.7%         78               65                     +13
wicket           update              18,724                 24,017
   +28.3%         50               35                     +15
wicket           fortune              24,363                 23,641
    -3.0%           76               94                      -18

https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/r13-vs-r14p1.1.html

Everything looks normal!

Happy Friday! :-)


Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> There won't be a difference.
> There is only one page in these tests and it is stateless, i.e. it is not
> stored.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Martin Makundi <martin.makundi@
> koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
>> Would be interesting to run this performance test Wicket with speed patch
>> #6177
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6177
>>
>> 2017-03-23 15:58 GMT+02:00 Marcel Barbosa Pinto <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> > That is really good!
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Great!
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>> > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > "New" does not mean better. :-)
>> > > >
>> > > > kind regards
>> > > >
>> > > > Tobias
>> > > >
>> > > > > Am 22.03.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <
>> > > > martijn.dashorst@gmail.com>:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > WOW
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> > > mgrigorov@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >> Hi,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Somehow Wicket finished at 3rd position at the last preview run
>> of
>> > > > >> TechEmpower framework tests :-)
>> > > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
>> > > > section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> At plaintext test we are at #18:
>> > > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
>> > > > section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Too bad that the new MySQL JDBC driver v.6 failed at their
>> servers,
>> > > > >> otherwise I'd expect good results there too.
>> > > > >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/2603
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Wicket 7.6.0 performs ~300% better than Round 13!
>> > > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/
>> > > > r13-vs-r14p1.html
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> The improvements come from
>> > > > >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/commit/
>> > > > 54152ceb735cf63351537556aa316dfd29202af4
>> > > > >> - custom root request mapper
>> > > > >> - reduced the response size to the minimum
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Once again the reactive frameworks are slower than the good old
>> > > Wicket!
>> > > > :-)
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Martin Grigorov
>> > > > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> > > > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
>> > http://wicketinaction.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ---------
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Marcel Barbosa Pinto
>> > 55 11 98255 8288
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: Wicket is #3 in the JSON perf test by TechEmpower

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
There won't be a difference.
There is only one page in these tests and it is stateless, i.e. it is not
stored.

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Martin Makundi <
martin.makundi@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:

> Would be interesting to run this performance test Wicket with speed patch
> #6177
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6177
>
> 2017-03-23 15:58 GMT+02:00 Marcel Barbosa Pinto <ma...@gmail.com>:
>
> > That is really good!
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Great!
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > "New" does not mean better. :-)
> > > >
> > > > kind regards
> > > >
> > > > Tobias
> > > >
> > > > > Am 22.03.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <
> > > > martijn.dashorst@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > WOW
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Somehow Wicket finished at 3rd position at the last preview run of
> > > > >> TechEmpower framework tests :-)
> > > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
> > > > section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
> > > > >>
> > > > >> At plaintext test we are at #18:
> > > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
> > > > section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Too bad that the new MySQL JDBC driver v.6 failed at their
> servers,
> > > > >> otherwise I'd expect good results there too.
> > > > >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/2603
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Wicket 7.6.0 performs ~300% better than Round 13!
> > > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/
> > > > r13-vs-r14p1.html
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The improvements come from
> > > > >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/commit/
> > > > 54152ceb735cf63351537556aa316dfd29202af4
> > > > >> - custom root request mapper
> > > > >> - reduced the response size to the minimum
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Once again the reactive frameworks are slower than the good old
> > > Wicket!
> > > > :-)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Martin Grigorov
> > > > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
> > http://wicketinaction.com
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Marcel Barbosa Pinto
> > 55 11 98255 8288
> >
>

Re: Wicket is #3 in the JSON perf test by TechEmpower

Posted by Martin Makundi <ma...@koodaripalvelut.com>.
Would be interesting to run this performance test Wicket with speed patch
#6177

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6177

2017-03-23 15:58 GMT+02:00 Marcel Barbosa Pinto <ma...@gmail.com>:

> That is really good!
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Great!
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "New" does not mean better. :-)
> > >
> > > kind regards
> > >
> > > Tobias
> > >
> > > > Am 22.03.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <
> > > martijn.dashorst@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > WOW
> > > >
> > > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Somehow Wicket finished at 3rd position at the last preview run of
> > > >> TechEmpower framework tests :-)
> > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
> > > section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
> > > >>
> > > >> At plaintext test we are at #18:
> > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
> > > section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext
> > > >>
> > > >> Too bad that the new MySQL JDBC driver v.6 failed at their servers,
> > > >> otherwise I'd expect good results there too.
> > > >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/2603
> > > >>
> > > >> Wicket 7.6.0 performs ~300% better than Round 13!
> > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/
> > > r13-vs-r14p1.html
> > > >>
> > > >> The improvements come from
> > > >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/commit/
> > > 54152ceb735cf63351537556aa316dfd29202af4
> > > >> - custom root request mapper
> > > >> - reduced the response size to the minimum
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Once again the reactive frameworks are slower than the good old
> > Wicket!
> > > :-)
> > > >>
> > > >> Martin Grigorov
> > > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
> http://wicketinaction.com
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Marcel Barbosa Pinto
> 55 11 98255 8288
>

Re: Wicket is #3 in the JSON perf test by TechEmpower

Posted by Marcel Barbosa Pinto <ma...@gmail.com>.
That is really good!

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Great!
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > "New" does not mean better. :-)
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> > > Am 22.03.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <
> > martijn.dashorst@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > WOW
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigorov@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Somehow Wicket finished at 3rd position at the last preview run of
> > >> TechEmpower framework tests :-)
> > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
> > section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
> > >>
> > >> At plaintext test we are at #18:
> > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
> > section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext
> > >>
> > >> Too bad that the new MySQL JDBC driver v.6 failed at their servers,
> > >> otherwise I'd expect good results there too.
> > >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/2603
> > >>
> > >> Wicket 7.6.0 performs ~300% better than Round 13!
> > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/
> > r13-vs-r14p1.html
> > >>
> > >> The improvements come from
> > >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/commit/
> > 54152ceb735cf63351537556aa316dfd29202af4
> > >> - custom root request mapper
> > >> - reduced the response size to the minimum
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Once again the reactive frameworks are slower than the good old
> Wicket!
> > :-)
> > >>
> > >> Martin Grigorov
> > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>



-- 

Marcel Barbosa Pinto
55 11 98255 8288

Re: Wicket is #3 in the JSON perf test by TechEmpower

Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
Great!

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassoloschenko@googlemail.com> wrote:

> "New" does not mean better. :-)
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 22.03.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <
> martijn.dashorst@gmail.com>:
> >
> > WOW
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Somehow Wicket finished at 3rd position at the last preview run of
> >> TechEmpower framework tests :-)
> >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
> section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
> >>
> >> At plaintext test we are at #18:
> >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
> section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext
> >>
> >> Too bad that the new MySQL JDBC driver v.6 failed at their servers,
> >> otherwise I'd expect good results there too.
> >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/2603
> >>
> >> Wicket 7.6.0 performs ~300% better than Round 13!
> >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/
> r13-vs-r14p1.html
> >>
> >> The improvements come from
> >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/commit/
> 54152ceb735cf63351537556aa316dfd29202af4
> >> - custom root request mapper
> >> - reduced the response size to the minimum
> >>
> >>
> >> Once again the reactive frameworks are slower than the good old Wicket!
> :-)
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Wicket is #3 in the JSON perf test by TechEmpower

Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
"New" does not mean better. :-)

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 22.03.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>:
> 
> WOW
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Somehow Wicket finished at 3rd position at the last preview run of
>> TechEmpower framework tests :-)
>> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
>> 
>> At plaintext test we are at #18:
>> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext
>> 
>> Too bad that the new MySQL JDBC driver v.6 failed at their servers,
>> otherwise I'd expect good results there too.
>> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/2603
>> 
>> Wicket 7.6.0 performs ~300% better than Round 13!
>> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/r13-vs-r14p1.html
>> 
>> The improvements come from
>> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/commit/54152ceb735cf63351537556aa316dfd29202af4
>> - custom root request mapper
>> - reduced the response size to the minimum
>> 
>> 
>> Once again the reactive frameworks are slower than the good old Wicket! :-)
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org


Re: Wicket is #3 in the JSON perf test by TechEmpower

Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
WOW

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Somehow Wicket finished at 3rd position at the last preview run of
> TechEmpower framework tests :-)
> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
>
> At plaintext test we are at #18:
> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext
>
> Too bad that the new MySQL JDBC driver v.6 failed at their servers,
> otherwise I'd expect good results there too.
> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/2603
>
> Wicket 7.6.0 performs ~300% better than Round 13!
> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/r13-vs-r14p1.html
>
> The improvements come from
> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/commit/54152ceb735cf63351537556aa316dfd29202af4
> - custom root request mapper
> - reduced the response size to the minimum
>
>
> Once again the reactive frameworks are slower than the good old Wicket! :-)
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org