You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2007/09/23 10:38:48 UTC
[vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.3 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out. Note, that this is the first version
of the unified Trinidad plugins, that will be used for our JSF 1.1 and
JSF 1.2 CORE.
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
Please take a look at the "1.2.3" artifacts and vote.
How to test those JARs ?
1. there is now a zip file (org.zip) (see [1])
2. use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file:
...
<pluginRepositories>
<pluginRepository>
<id>apache.stage</id>
<name>Apache Stage Repository</name>
<url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/123-plugins</url>
<layout>default</layout>
</pluginRepository>
</pluginRepositories>
...
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..............
------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
The easiest way is to make a link to the new page first, then click on it.
I think there's also a "new page" menu item somewhere.
On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, stupid question, how do I create a new WIKI page for this
> getting started page? Do I simply need more privileges or did I miss
> something somewhere?
>
> On 9/25/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm planning on help with the documentation, and plan to add a new
> > > page to the WIKI for a "getting started" on using the
> > > maven-faces-plugin with facelets and jsf 1.1.
> >
> > That'd be awesome!
> >
> > > On the topic of what I brought up, would it be better to have the
> > > component type ID filter be placed on the dynamic content only and not
> > > on the included content (meaning the component tags from the plugin,
> > > but do not filter the faces-config-base.xml content)?
> >
> > That would be great, but... it'd require some "fun" rearchitecting.
> > The filtering is done in XSLT, after the merge with the base doc
> > has already happened. I agree that it's totally wacky that you explicitly
> > define something explicitly in faces-config-base.xml and then the
> > tool says "nope, you must not have *really* wanted that"!
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Is there a good reason that I can't think of at the moment to filter
> > > all the faces-config content and not just the generated content?
> > >
> > > -Andrew
> > >
> > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > We should probably get serious about at least documenting the big
> > > > "gotchas" of the faces plugin. I've started a subsection at
> > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins so we at least have
> > > > somewhere to put this sort of info. Andrew, stuff like this that you
> > > > discover would be great additions.
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > After investigating the code more, it is working as designed, I just
> > > > > expected different results. Please disregard this previous email of
> > > > > mine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements from
> > > > > > the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I screwed
> > > > > > up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > > > > > > > and why..............
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
Mike's suggestion worked, I also found the help docs on the WIKI, I
should have tried a little harder before sending an email :-)
Here is my progress so far:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Facelets_and_JSF_1%2e1_maven-faces-plugin_Getting_started
Will keep working on it as I have time.
-Andrew
On 9/25/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could just add it (at least for now) to
> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Okay, stupid question, how do I create a new WIKI page for this
> > getting started page? Do I simply need more privileges or did I miss
> > something somewhere?
> >
> > On 9/25/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I'm planning on help with the documentation, and plan to add a new
> > > > page to the WIKI for a "getting started" on using the
> > > > maven-faces-plugin with facelets and jsf 1.1.
> > >
> > > That'd be awesome!
> > >
> > > > On the topic of what I brought up, would it be better to have the
> > > > component type ID filter be placed on the dynamic content only and not
> > > > on the included content (meaning the component tags from the plugin,
> > > > but do not filter the faces-config-base.xml content)?
> > >
> > > That would be great, but... it'd require some "fun" rearchitecting.
> > > The filtering is done in XSLT, after the merge with the base doc
> > > has already happened. I agree that it's totally wacky that you explicitly
> > > define something explicitly in faces-config-base.xml and then the
> > > tool says "nope, you must not have *really* wanted that"!
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Is there a good reason that I can't think of at the moment to filter
> > > > all the faces-config content and not just the generated content?
> > > >
> > > > -Andrew
> > > >
> > > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > We should probably get serious about at least documenting the big
> > > > > "gotchas" of the faces plugin. I've started a subsection at
> > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins so we at least have
> > > > > somewhere to put this sort of info. Andrew, stuff like this that you
> > > > > discover would be great additions.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Adam
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > After investigating the code more, it is working as designed, I just
> > > > > > expected different results. Please disregard this previous email of
> > > > > > mine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements from
> > > > > > > the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I screwed
> > > > > > > up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > > > > > > > > and why..............
> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
You could just add it (at least for now) to
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins
-- Adam
On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, stupid question, how do I create a new WIKI page for this
> getting started page? Do I simply need more privileges or did I miss
> something somewhere?
>
> On 9/25/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm planning on help with the documentation, and plan to add a new
> > > page to the WIKI for a "getting started" on using the
> > > maven-faces-plugin with facelets and jsf 1.1.
> >
> > That'd be awesome!
> >
> > > On the topic of what I brought up, would it be better to have the
> > > component type ID filter be placed on the dynamic content only and not
> > > on the included content (meaning the component tags from the plugin,
> > > but do not filter the faces-config-base.xml content)?
> >
> > That would be great, but... it'd require some "fun" rearchitecting.
> > The filtering is done in XSLT, after the merge with the base doc
> > has already happened. I agree that it's totally wacky that you explicitly
> > define something explicitly in faces-config-base.xml and then the
> > tool says "nope, you must not have *really* wanted that"!
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Is there a good reason that I can't think of at the moment to filter
> > > all the faces-config content and not just the generated content?
> > >
> > > -Andrew
> > >
> > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > We should probably get serious about at least documenting the big
> > > > "gotchas" of the faces plugin. I've started a subsection at
> > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins so we at least have
> > > > somewhere to put this sort of info. Andrew, stuff like this that you
> > > > discover would be great additions.
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > After investigating the code more, it is working as designed, I just
> > > > > expected different results. Please disregard this previous email of
> > > > > mine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements from
> > > > > > the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I screwed
> > > > > > up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > > > > > > > and why..............
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
Okay, stupid question, how do I create a new WIKI page for this
getting started page? Do I simply need more privileges or did I miss
something somewhere?
On 9/25/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm planning on help with the documentation, and plan to add a new
> > page to the WIKI for a "getting started" on using the
> > maven-faces-plugin with facelets and jsf 1.1.
>
> That'd be awesome!
>
> > On the topic of what I brought up, would it be better to have the
> > component type ID filter be placed on the dynamic content only and not
> > on the included content (meaning the component tags from the plugin,
> > but do not filter the faces-config-base.xml content)?
>
> That would be great, but... it'd require some "fun" rearchitecting.
> The filtering is done in XSLT, after the merge with the base doc
> has already happened. I agree that it's totally wacky that you explicitly
> define something explicitly in faces-config-base.xml and then the
> tool says "nope, you must not have *really* wanted that"!
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> >
> > Is there a good reason that I can't think of at the moment to filter
> > all the faces-config content and not just the generated content?
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > We should probably get serious about at least documenting the big
> > > "gotchas" of the faces plugin. I've started a subsection at
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins so we at least have
> > > somewhere to put this sort of info. Andrew, stuff like this that you
> > > discover would be great additions.
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > After investigating the code more, it is working as designed, I just
> > > > expected different results. Please disregard this previous email of
> > > > mine.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements from
> > > > > the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I screwed
> > > > > up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > > > > > > and why..............
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm planning on help with the documentation, and plan to add a new
> page to the WIKI for a "getting started" on using the
> maven-faces-plugin with facelets and jsf 1.1.
That'd be awesome!
> On the topic of what I brought up, would it be better to have the
> component type ID filter be placed on the dynamic content only and not
> on the included content (meaning the component tags from the plugin,
> but do not filter the faces-config-base.xml content)?
That would be great, but... it'd require some "fun" rearchitecting.
The filtering is done in XSLT, after the merge with the base doc
has already happened. I agree that it's totally wacky that you explicitly
define something explicitly in faces-config-base.xml and then the
tool says "nope, you must not have *really* wanted that"!
-- Adam
>
> Is there a good reason that I can't think of at the moment to filter
> all the faces-config content and not just the generated content?
>
> -Andrew
>
> On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We should probably get serious about at least documenting the big
> > "gotchas" of the faces plugin. I've started a subsection at
> > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins so we at least have
> > somewhere to put this sort of info. Andrew, stuff like this that you
> > discover would be great additions.
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > After investigating the code more, it is working as designed, I just
> > > expected different results. Please disregard this previous email of
> > > mine.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release.
> > > >
> > > > I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements from
> > > > the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I screwed
> > > > up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the release.
> > > >
> > > > -Andrew
> > > >
> > > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > > > > > and why..............
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Adam
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
I'm planning on help with the documentation, and plan to add a new
page to the WIKI for a "getting started" on using the
maven-faces-plugin with facelets and jsf 1.1.
On the topic of what I brought up, would it be better to have the
component type ID filter be placed on the dynamic content only and not
on the included content (meaning the component tags from the plugin,
but do not filter the faces-config-base.xml content)?
Is there a good reason that I can't think of at the moment to filter
all the faces-config content and not just the generated content?
-Andrew
On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We should probably get serious about at least documenting the big
> "gotchas" of the faces plugin. I've started a subsection at
> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins so we at least have
> somewhere to put this sort of info. Andrew, stuff like this that you
> discover would be great additions.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > After investigating the code more, it is working as designed, I just
> > expected different results. Please disregard this previous email of
> > mine.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew
> >
> > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release.
> > >
> > > I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements from
> > > the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I screwed
> > > up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the release.
> > >
> > > -Andrew
> > >
> > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > > > > and why..............
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
We should probably get serious about at least documenting the big
"gotchas" of the faces plugin. I've started a subsection at
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins so we at least have
somewhere to put this sort of info. Andrew, stuff like this that you
discover would be great additions.
-- Adam
On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After investigating the code more, it is working as designed, I just
> expected different results. Please disregard this previous email of
> mine.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release.
> >
> > I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements from
> > the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I screwed
> > up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the release.
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > > > and why..............
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> >
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
After investigating the code more, it is working as designed, I just
expected different results. Please disregard this previous email of
mine.
Thanks,
Andrew
On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release.
>
> I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements from
> the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I screwed
> up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the release.
>
> -Andrew
>
> On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > > and why..............
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release.
I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements from
the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I screwed
up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the release.
-Andrew
On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > and why..............
> > ------------------------------------------------
>
> -- Adam
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------
> [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
-- Adam
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 9/23/07, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 9/23/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.3 release of the
> > Apache
> > > > MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out. Note, that this is the first
> > version
> > > > of the unified Trinidad plugins, that will be used for our JSF 1.1and
> > > > JSF 1.2 CORE.
> > > > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> > > >
> > > > Please take a look at the "1.2.3" artifacts and vote.
> > > >
> > > > How to test those JARs ?
> > > >
> > > > 1. there is now a zip file (org.zip) (see [1])
> > > > 2. use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file:
> > > > ...
> > > > <pluginRepositories>
> > > > <pluginRepository>
> > > > <id>apache.stage</id>
> > > > <name>Apache Stage Repository</name>
> > > > <url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/123-plugins
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Ematzew/123-plugins></url>
> > > > <layout>default</layout>
> > > > </pluginRepository>
> > > > </pluginRepositories>
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> > released,
> > > > and why..............
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 9/23/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.3 release of the Apache
> > > MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out. Note, that this is the first
> version
> > > of the unified Trinidad plugins, that will be used for our JSF 1.1 and
> > > JSF 1.2 CORE.
> > > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> > >
> > > Please take a look at the "1.2.3" artifacts and vote.
> > >
> > > How to test those JARs ?
> > >
> > > 1. there is now a zip file (org.zip) (see [1])
> > > 2. use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file:
> > > ...
> > > <pluginRepositories>
> > > <pluginRepository>
> > > <id>apache.stage</id>
> > > <name>Apache Stage Repository</name>
> > > <url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/123-plugins</url>
> > > <layout>default</layout>
> > > </pluginRepository>
> > > </pluginRepositories>
> > > ...
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> released,
> > > and why..............
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.3 release of the Apache
> > MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out. Note, that this is the first version
> > of the unified Trinidad plugins, that will be used for our JSF 1.1 and
> > JSF 1.2 CORE.
> > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> >
> > Please take a look at the "1.2.3" artifacts and vote.
> >
> > How to test those JARs ?
> >
> > 1. there is now a zip file (org.zip) (see [1])
> > 2. use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file:
> > ...
> > <pluginRepositories>
> > <pluginRepository>
> > <id>apache.stage</id>
> > <name>Apache Stage Repository</name>
> > <url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/123-plugins</url>
> > <layout>default</layout>
> > </pluginRepository>
> > </pluginRepositories>
> > ...
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > and why..............
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
+1
On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.3 release of the Apache
> MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out. Note, that this is the first version
> of the unified Trinidad plugins, that will be used for our JSF 1.1 and
> JSF 1.2 CORE.
> The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
>
> Please take a look at the "1.2.3" artifacts and vote.
>
> How to test those JARs ?
>
> 1. there is now a zip file (org.zip) (see [1])
> 2. use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file:
> ...
> <pluginRepositories>
> <pluginRepository>
> <id>apache.stage</id>
> <name>Apache Stage Repository</name>
> <url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/123-plugins</url>
> <layout>default</layout>
> </pluginRepository>
> </pluginRepositories>
> ...
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, no one has had any incentive yet to implement non-Trinidad 1.1
component generation. I don't know anyone that's working on it.
-- Adam
On 9/26/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Should this be filed as a bug, or is it a known issue / work in progress?
>
> I think that is the case, because Bruno enabled it (maven-faces-plg)
> to generate our JSF 1.2 MyFaces Core stuff.
>
> -Matthias
>
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.3 release of the Apache
> > > MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out. Note, that this is the first version
> > > of the unified Trinidad plugins, that will be used for our JSF 1.1 and
> > > JSF 1.2 CORE.
> > > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> > >
> > > Please take a look at the "1.2.3" artifacts and vote.
> > >
> > > How to test those JARs ?
> > >
> > > 1. there is now a zip file (org.zip) (see [1])
> > > 2. use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file:
> > > ...
> > > <pluginRepositories>
> > > <pluginRepository>
> > > <id>apache.stage</id>
> > > <name>Apache Stage Repository</name>
> > > <url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/123-plugins</url>
> > > <layout>default</layout>
> > > </pluginRepository>
> > > </pluginRepositories>
> > > ...
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > > and why..............
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
> Should this be filed as a bug, or is it a known issue / work in progress?
I think that is the case, because Bruno enabled it (maven-faces-plg)
to generate our JSF 1.2 MyFaces Core stuff.
-Matthias
>
> -Andrew
>
> On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.3 release of the Apache
> > MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out. Note, that this is the first version
> > of the unified Trinidad plugins, that will be used for our JSF 1.1 and
> > JSF 1.2 CORE.
> > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> >
> > Please take a look at the "1.2.3" artifacts and vote.
> >
> > How to test those JARs ?
> >
> > 1. there is now a zip file (org.zip) (see [1])
> > 2. use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file:
> > ...
> > <pluginRepositories>
> > <pluginRepository>
> > <id>apache.stage</id>
> > <name>Apache Stage Repository</name>
> > <url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/123-plugins</url>
> > <layout>default</layout>
> > </pluginRepository>
> > </pluginRepositories>
> > ...
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > and why..............
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.3)
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
I'm actually using the Trinidad component generation at the moment,
but forgot to add the
"<mfp:implementation-type>trinidad</mfp:implementation-type>" to my
XML file at first. I noticed that the MyFaces component generator is
ignoring the JSF 1.1 version, and always using ValueExpression in the
code, which obviously will not compile in JSF 1.1.
Should this be filed as a bug, or is it a known issue / work in progress?
-Andrew
On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.3 release of the Apache
> MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out. Note, that this is the first version
> of the unified Trinidad plugins, that will be used for our JSF 1.1 and
> JSF 1.2 CORE.
> The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
>
> Please take a look at the "1.2.3" artifacts and vote.
>
> How to test those JARs ?
>
> 1. there is now a zip file (org.zip) (see [1])
> 2. use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file:
> ...
> <pluginRepositories>
> <pluginRepository>
> <id>apache.stage</id>
> <name>Apache Stage Repository</name>
> <url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/123-plugins</url>
> <layout>default</layout>
> </pluginRepository>
> </pluginRepositories>
> ...
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>