You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@jmeter.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2021/10/03 12:46:24 UTC

[Bug 65611] New: Add support for IPv6 addresses when specifying a remote worker node

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65611

            Bug ID: 65611
           Summary: Add support for IPv6 addresses when specifying a
                    remote worker node
           Product: JMeter
           Version: 5.4.1
          Hardware: PC
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: Main
          Assignee: issues@jmeter.apache.org
          Reporter: peter.wong@csexperts.com
  Target Milestone: JMETER_5.5

According to step 2 of the following URL, JMeter only accepts IPv4 addresses
when specifying a remote worker node.

https://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/remote-test.html


In this scenario, entering an IPv6 address will result in a
NumberFormatException.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65611] Add support for IPv6 addresses when specifying a remote worker node

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65611

Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 OS|                            |All

--- Comment #1 from Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> ---
Currently discussed at ttps://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/673

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65611] Add support for IPv6 addresses when specifying a remote worker node

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65611

Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> ---
Closing as fixed, as user didn't respond, I assume, that it works now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65611] Add support for IPv6 addresses when specifying a remote worker node

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65611

Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO
           Keywords|                            |FixedInTrunk

--- Comment #2 from Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> ---
Should be fixed in trunk.
@Peter: Could you report back, whether this fixes your problem?


commit d0740914053bb74ac46edb586aa9a959f5015ac8
AuthorDate: Sun Oct 10 21:10:09 2021 +0200

    Add support for IPv6 addresses when specifying a remote worker node

    Now it should be possible to specify an IPv6 address with the bracketed
notation:
      remote_host=[::1]:2001

    Based on a patch by Peter Wong
    Closes #673
    Bugzilla Id: 65611
---
 .../src/main/java/org/apache/jmeter/engine/ClientJMeterEngine.java     | 3 ++-
 xdocs/changes.xml                                                      | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65611] Add support for IPv6 addresses when specifying a remote worker node

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65611

Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |radhika.chengappa@csexperts
                   |                            |.com

--- Comment #3 from Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> ---
*** Bug 65288 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.