Re: [VOTE] Change package names from "pivot.*" to "org.apache.pivot.*"

[Christopher Brind <br...@brindy.org.uk>]

+1


2009/6/5 Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com>

> It has been proposed that we align our package naming conventions with Java
> and Apache standards and rename "pivot.*" to "org.apache.pivot.*". Please
> register your vote on this issue by responding to this email as follows:
>
> [  ] +1 Change package names
> [  ] +0
> [  ] -0
> [  ] -1 Don't change package names (specify why)
>
> Upon a positive majority of binding votes and no binding vetoes, we will
> change the package names as part of the 1.3 release. Please submit your vote
> no later than 18:00 GMT on Monday, June 8.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Change package names from "pivot.*" to "org.apache.pivot.*"

[Noel Grandin <no...@gmail.com>]

-0

I don't think it's worth fighting if it's going to hinder approval by
the Apache overlords, but I frankly prefer the current convention.

Christopher Brind wrote:
> +1
>
>
> 2009/6/5 Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com>
>
>   
>> It has been proposed that we align our package naming conventions with Java
>> and Apache standards and rename "pivot.*" to "org.apache.pivot.*". Please
>> register your vote on this issue by responding to this email as follows:
>>
>> [  ] +1 Change package names
>> [  ] +0
>> [  ] -0
>> [  ] -1 Don't change package names (specify why)
>>
>> Upon a positive majority of binding votes and no binding vetoes, we will
>> change the package names as part of the 1.3 release. Please submit your vote
>> no later than 18:00 GMT on Monday, June 8.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Greg
>>
>>
>>     
>
>