You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@seatunnel.apache.org by "Arshad, Mohammad" <mo...@visa.com.INVALID> on 2024/08/19 09:11:41 UTC

Seatunnel-Engine(Zeta) Stability.

Hi All
Seatunnel-engine(Zeta) relies extensively on community edition Hazelcast, which however, missing some basic features such as Kerberos authentication and SSL and many other features
Reference: https://hazelcast.com/products/feature-comparison/

How the community is using Zeta. is there any alternate way to have Kerberos and SSL?
is anybody using zeta engine in enterprise level deployment? if yes, how they are managing the security?
is there any issue of stability with Hazelcast community edition?

Thanks & Regards
Mohammad Arshad

Re: Seatunnel-Engine(Zeta) Stability.

Posted by "Arshad, Mohammad" <mo...@visa.com.INVALID>.

Thanks Jia Fan for your very informative response.

Thanks & Regards
Mohammad Arshad


From: Jia Fan <fa...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, 19 August 2024 at 3:10 PM
To: dev@seatunnel.apache.org <de...@seatunnel.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Seatunnel-Engine(Zeta) Stability.
Hi Mohammad Arshad.

> How the community is using Zeta. is there any alternate way to have
Kerberos and SSL?
Currently, the community does not have a corresponding solution, which will
be developed later.
> is anybody using zeta engine in enterprise level deployment? if yes, how
they are managing the security?
You can restrict access to the port or define a complex cluster-name to
prevent other nodes from joining the cluster. Or try limit node by
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.hazelcast.com%2Fhazelcast%2F5.1%2Fclusters%2Fdiscovering-by-tcp&data=05%7C02%7Cmohammad.arshad%40visa.com%7C9be9dd7c45ac487c025b08dcc0330494%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C638596572565542841%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9IDtswpVFn8GV4w%2Buej9M%2FOJoHKlbpvx0KURrfy2Djc%3D&reserved=0<https://docs.hazelcast.com/hazelcast/5.1/clusters/discovering-by-tcp> and
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.hazelcast.com%2Fhazelcast%2F5.1%2Fclusters%2Fdiscovering-native-clients&data=05%7C02%7Cmohammad.arshad%40visa.com%7C9be9dd7c45ac487c025b08dcc0330494%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C638596572565554891%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=tdoov2g%2FfGcj%2BY%2FJXaERoFKt%2FvrqIqoVnn6ORabiZX0%3D&reserved=0<https://docs.hazelcast.com/hazelcast/5.1/clusters/discovering-native-clients>
> is there any issue of stability with Hazelcast community edition?
No serious problems have been found so far


Arshad, Mohammad <mo...@visa.com.invalid> 于2024年8月19日周一 17:12写道：

> Hi All
> Seatunnel-engine(Zeta) relies extensively on community edition Hazelcast,
> which however, missing some basic features such as Kerberos authentication
> and SSL and many other features
> Reference: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhazelcast.com%2Fproducts%2Ffeature-comparison%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohammad.arshad%40visa.com%7C9be9dd7c45ac487c025b08dcc0330494%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C638596572565562917%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=OMY0iuF0%2FW238iFmDOF%2F4LAj7K%2FX%2BOxHf9O1EWIRCVs%3D&reserved=0<https://hazelcast.com/products/feature-comparison/>
>
> How the community is using Zeta. is there any alternate way to have
> Kerberos and SSL?
> is anybody using zeta engine in enterprise level deployment? if yes, how
> they are managing the security?
> is there any issue of stability with Hazelcast community edition?
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Mohammad Arshad
>
>

Re: Seatunnel-Engine(Zeta) Stability.

Posted by Jia Fan <fa...@gmail.com>.

Hi Mohammad Arshad.

> How the community is using Zeta. is there any alternate way to have
Kerberos and SSL?
Currently, the community does not have a corresponding solution, which will
be developed later.
> is anybody using zeta engine in enterprise level deployment? if yes, how
they are managing the security?
You can restrict access to the port or define a complex cluster-name to
prevent other nodes from joining the cluster. Or try limit node by
https://docs.hazelcast.com/hazelcast/5.1/clusters/discovering-by-tcp and
https://docs.hazelcast.com/hazelcast/5.1/clusters/discovering-native-clients
> is there any issue of stability with Hazelcast community edition?
No serious problems have been found so far


Arshad, Mohammad <mo...@visa.com.invalid> 于2024年8月19日周一 17:12写道：

> Hi All
> Seatunnel-engine(Zeta) relies extensively on community edition Hazelcast,
> which however, missing some basic features such as Kerberos authentication
> and SSL and many other features
> Reference: https://hazelcast.com/products/feature-comparison/
>
> How the community is using Zeta. is there any alternate way to have
> Kerberos and SSL?
> is anybody using zeta engine in enterprise level deployment? if yes, how
> they are managing the security?
> is there any issue of stability with Hazelcast community edition?
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Mohammad Arshad
>
>