Re: [S2] Migrate from Struts 2.0.1 to 2.0.5

[walidito <wa...@sgcib.com>]

Thanks shuai for yoyr response,
I think I'd better wait for next releases (or for a GA release, if this
happens one day I hope).
thanks.


Shuai Zheng wrote:
> 
> Based on my own experience, WW-1711 is a big issue.
> I know there is a way to walk around it, but I feel it makes the code ugly
> and it is strange to put extra code there (select tag is popular and shown
> all pages. Also it is strange that a string will be used as the value of
> select, in most of cases, a value of select will be integer, isn't it?).
> 
> I am sad to hear that it will not be fixed in 2.0.6 and there is not this
> issue in previous release. In my experience, a new bug comes with a new
> release should be easy to solve, but maybe I am not correct.
> 
> Anyway, 2.0.5 is a good job. Based on my own experience, it is more stable
> and faster than 2.0.1. For myself, the only reason I don't upgrade because
> I
> don't want my team to change the code again and again.
> 
> May I know when the GA release will come out? It looks like we need to
> wait
> another 2 weeks.
> 
> When everytime a new release comes out(even still a beta), a new
> *-all.zipshould be released for downloading. This will attract more
> people to use it
> and this means more people will help to test it. As you see, there are
> lots
> of people, including me, don't want to use a jar which is compiled by
> ourselves (because we can't take too much risk in the project, using a
> beta
> version is already a risk, we can't afford more).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Zheng Shuai
> 
> On 2/14/07, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/13/07, Shuai Zheng <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I will suggest you to wait for the next release, because there are
>> really
>> > some critical bugs in the 2.0.5 (especially the bug on select tag).
>>
>> If you mean not being able to select non-string types, the only fix
>> we've had so far breaks a lot of the tests,
>>
>> * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1711
>>
>> so we haven't applied it to 2.0.6 yet (just the head, which is tagged
>> 2.1.x now).
>>
>> If you know of other critical issues, be sure that they have been
>> reported through JIRA for 2.0.6. If a problem isn't listed in JIRA,
>> then we don't know it exists :)
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Migrate-from-Struts-2.0.1-to-2.0.5-tf3221136.html#a8966503
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org

Re: [S2] Migrate from Struts 2.0.1 to 2.0.5

[Shuai Zheng <zh...@gmail.com>]

You are welcome.
I want to say some more here:
1, if your project does not experience any bugs that has been reported for
2.0.1, it is not urgent to upgrade to another beta release.
2, if you need a demo to show to customer, I will suggest you to upgrade
because the 2.0.5 use new dojo version and it has some cool features. For
example, even there are some bugs reported for new datetimepicker tag, I
will still want to it.
3, Anyway, you should try the new version personally because it is the
direction but maybe not in the project. Our testing can help to let the GA
release comes earlier:)

Regards,

Zheng Shuai

On 2/14/07, walidito <wa...@sgcib.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks shuai for yoyr response,
> I think I'd better wait for next releases (or for a GA release, if this
> happens one day I hope).
> thanks.
>
>
> Shuai Zheng wrote:
> >
> > Based on my own experience, WW-1711 is a big issue.
> > I know there is a way to walk around it, but I feel it makes the code
> ugly
> > and it is strange to put extra code there (select tag is popular and
> shown
> > all pages. Also it is strange that a string will be used as the value of
> > select, in most of cases, a value of select will be integer, isn't it?).
> >
> > I am sad to hear that it will not be fixed in 2.0.6 and there is not
> this
> > issue in previous release. In my experience, a new bug comes with a new
> > release should be easy to solve, but maybe I am not correct.
> >
> > Anyway, 2.0.5 is a good job. Based on my own experience, it is more
> stable
> > and faster than 2.0.1. For myself, the only reason I don't upgrade
> because
> > I
> > don't want my team to change the code again and again.
> >
> > May I know when the GA release will come out? It looks like we need to
> > wait
> > another 2 weeks.
> >
> > When everytime a new release comes out(even still a beta), a new
> > *-all.zipshould be released for downloading. This will attract more
> > people to use it
> > and this means more people will help to test it. As you see, there are
> > lots
> > of people, including me, don't want to use a jar which is compiled by
> > ourselves (because we can't take too much risk in the project, using a
> > beta
> > version is already a risk, we can't afford more).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Zheng Shuai
> >
> > On 2/14/07, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/13/07, Shuai Zheng <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I will suggest you to wait for the next release, because there are
> >> really
> >> > some critical bugs in the 2.0.5 (especially the bug on select tag).
> >>
> >> If you mean not being able to select non-string types, the only fix
> >> we've had so far breaks a lot of the tests,
> >>
> >> * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1711
> >>
> >> so we haven't applied it to 2.0.6 yet (just the head, which is tagged
> >> 2.1.x now).
> >>
> >> If you know of other critical issues, be sure that they have been
> >> reported through JIRA for 2.0.6. If a problem isn't listed in JIRA,
> >> then we don't know it exists :)
> >>
> >> -Ted.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Migrate-from-Struts-2.0.1-to-2.0.5-tf3221136.html#a8966503
> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>