[GitHub] [iceberg] danielcweeks commented on a diff in pull request #6352: AWS: Fix inconsistent behavior of naming S3 location between read and write operations by allowing only s3 bucket name

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

danielcweeks commented on code in PR #6352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6352#discussion_r1046096643


##########
aws/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/aws/s3/S3URI.java:
##########
@@ -74,17 +74,14 @@ class S3URI {
     this.scheme = schemeSplit[0];
 
     String[] authoritySplit = schemeSplit[1].split(PATH_DELIM, 2);
-    ValidationException.check(
-        authoritySplit.length == 2, "Invalid S3 URI, cannot determine bucket: %s", location);
-    ValidationException.check(
-        !authoritySplit[1].trim().isEmpty(), "Invalid S3 URI, path is empty: %s", location);
+

Review Comment:
   This is definitely an interesting find, but I'm a little unclear on why you would want to do this.  If you use the bucket as the location of a table, you basically cannot use that bucket for anything else.  Things like orphan files procedure will wipe anything else in the bucket out.
   
   Is there a requirement that you cannot have a bucket prefix for some use case?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org