Re: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support

[Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>]

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Hari Kannan <ha...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi Sateesh,
>
> As we increase the cluster size, I wonder not having the management network on DVS might be an issue. I would strongly suggest we consider this. I also spoke to some folks who are more knowledgeable with customer implementations and they also say this would be an issue.
>
> As you know, we have a separate feature being discussed - support for PVLAN - so, PVLAN support via DVS is a must-have requirement..

+1 - yes please.

RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support

["Musayev, Ilya" <im...@webmd.net>]

+1 .. MGMT is also part of DVS in our and other ENVs.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 2:25 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Koushik Das; Anantha Kasetty
> Subject: Re: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
> 
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Hari Kannan <ha...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Hi Sateesh,
> >
> > As we increase the cluster size, I wonder not having the management
> network on DVS might be an issue. I would strongly suggest we consider this.
> I also spoke to some folks who are more knowledgeable with customer
> implementations and they also say this would be an issue.
> >
> > As you know, we have a separate feature being discussed - support for
> PVLAN - so, PVLAN support via DVS is a must-have requirement..
> 
> +1 - yes please.