You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@pulsar.apache.org by "heesung-sn (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/06/10 02:27:16 UTC
[GitHub] [pulsar] heesung-sn opened a new pull request, #20554: [fix][broker] Return isPartitionedTopicBeingDeletedAsync=true when a partitioned topic metadata is empty
heesung-sn opened a new pull request, #20554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20554
<!--
### Contribution Checklist
- PR title format should be *[type][component] summary*. For details, see *[Guideline - Pulsar PR Naming Convention](https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/develop-semantic-title/)*.
- Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
- Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from multiple issues.
- Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message
- Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and this checklist, leaving only the filled out template below.
-->
<!-- Details of when a PIP is required and how the PIP process work, please see: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pip/README.md -->
### Motivation
Found a partition metadata inconsistency bug due to the racing condition between forceful deletion of the partitioned topic and the topic partition auto-creation from the consumer's re-connection.
When there is a delete-partitioned-topic command with the force=true for a partitioned topic, the existing subscriptions reconnect, which recreates the topic partition. Meanwhile, the partitioned topic(the root topic) is removed from the metadata.
Issue reproduction step:
1. run broker
`bin/pulsar standalone`
2. run consumer
```
bin/pulsar-admin tenants create my-tenant
bin/pulsar-admin namespaces create my-tenant/my-namespace --bundles 5
bin/pulsar-admin topics create-partitioned-topic persistent://my-tenant/my-namespace/my-topic -p 2
bin/pulsar-client consume -s sub-read persistent://my-tenant/my-namespace/my-topic -p Earliest -n 0
```
3. delete the partitioned topic
`bin/pulsar-admin topics delete-partitioned-topic persistent://my-tenant/my-namespace/my-topic --force`
4. check topics
```
curl -X GET http://localhost:8080/admin/v2/persistent/my-tenant/my-namespace
["persistent://my-tenant/my-namespace/my-topic-partition-0","persistent://my-tenant/my-namespace/my-topic-partition-1"]%
curl -X GET http://localhost:8080/admin/v2/persistent/my-tenant/my-namespace/partitioned
[]%
```
5. check the topic creation fails
```
bin/pulsar-admin topics create-partitioned-topic persistent://my-tenant/my-namespace/my-topic -p 2
2023-06-09T17:55:01,664-0700 [AsyncHttpClient-7-1] WARN org.apache.pulsar.client.admin.internal.BaseResource - [http://localhost:8080/admin/v2/persistent/my-tenant/my-namespace/my-topic/partitions?createLocalTopicOnly=false] Failed to perform http put request: javax.ws.rs.ClientErrorException: HTTP 409 This topic already exists
This topic already exists
Reason: This topic already exists
```
### Modifications
- return isPartitionedTopicBeingDeletedAsync true when a partitioned topic metadata
### Verifying this change
- [x] Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.
This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe tests)*.
### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
<!-- DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION. CHECK THE PROPER BOX ONLY. -->
*If the box was checked, please highlight the changes*
- [ ] Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
- [ ] The public API
- [ ] The schema
- [ ] The default values of configurations
- [ ] The threading model
- [ ] The binary protocol
- [ ] The REST endpoints
- [ ] The admin CLI options
- [ ] The metrics
- [ ] Anything that affects deployment
### Documentation
<!-- DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION. CHECK THE PROPER BOX ONLY. -->
- [ ] `doc` <!-- Your PR contains doc changes. -->
- [ ] `doc-required` <!-- Your PR changes impact docs and you will update later -->
- [x] `doc-not-needed` <!-- Your PR changes do not impact docs -->
- [ ] `doc-complete` <!-- Docs have been already added -->
### Matching PR in forked repository
PR in forked repository: not provided as this is a trivial fix
<!--
After opening this PR, the build in apache/pulsar will fail and instructions will
be provided for opening a PR in the PR author's forked repository.
apache/pulsar pull requests should be first tested in your own fork since the
apache/pulsar CI based on GitHub Actions has constrained resources and quota.
GitHub Actions provides separate quota for pull requests that are executed in
a forked repository.
The tests will be run in the forked repository until all PR review comments have
been handled, the tests pass and the PR is approved by a reviewer.
-->
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [pulsar] heesung-sn commented on pull request #20554: [fix][broker] Return isPartitionedTopicBeingDeletedAsync=true when a partitioned topic metadata is empty
Posted by "heesung-sn (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
heesung-sn commented on PR #20554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20554#issuecomment-1690858722
I am closing this PR as this will be covered by https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19239
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [pulsar] heesung-sn commented on pull request #20554: [fix][broker] Return isPartitionedTopicBeingDeletedAsync=true when a partitioned topic metadata is empty
Posted by "heesung-sn (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
heesung-sn commented on PR #20554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20554#issuecomment-1585429440
@dlg99 PTAL.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [pulsar] heesung-sn commented on pull request #20554: [fix][broker] Return isPartitionedTopicBeingDeletedAsync=true when a partitioned topic metadata is empty
Posted by "heesung-sn (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
heesung-sn commented on PR #20554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20554#issuecomment-1587682521
This change fails the two tests because it fails to create topic partitions when their partitioned topic is created first.
`testPartitionedTopicAutoCreation, testCompatibilityWithPartitionKeyword`
@codelipenghui @mattisonchao @eolivelli, Please let me know if this change is acceptable. It looks odd that Pulsar allows creating topic partitions, but then it does not allow its partitioned topic creation. Upon topic partition creation, shouldn't we check if the corresponding partitioned topic is created first?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [pulsar] heesung-sn closed pull request #20554: [fix][broker] Return isPartitionedTopicBeingDeletedAsync=true when a partitioned topic metadata is empty
Posted by "heesung-sn (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
heesung-sn closed pull request #20554: [fix][broker] Return isPartitionedTopicBeingDeletedAsync=true when a partitioned topic metadata is empty
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20554
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [pulsar] github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20554: [fix][broker] Return isPartitionedTopicBeingDeletedAsync=true when a partitioned topic metadata is empty
Posted by "github-actions[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #20554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20554#issuecomment-1633431209
The pr had no activity for 30 days, mark with Stale label.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [pulsar] heesung-sn commented on pull request #20554: [fix][broker] Return isPartitionedTopicBeingDeletedAsync=true when a partitioned topic metadata is empty
Posted by "heesung-sn (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
heesung-sn commented on PR #20554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20554#issuecomment-1586292640
> It's better to add a test
I think we have a test caae for this, but in the test it closes the producers and consumers right after the delete command. To reproduce the issue, I moved the pub/sub close to the end of the test.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [pulsar] heesung-sn commented on pull request #20554: [fix][broker] Return isPartitionedTopicBeingDeletedAsync=true when a partitioned topic metadata is empty
Posted by "heesung-sn (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
heesung-sn commented on PR #20554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20554#issuecomment-1587695288
This change fails the two tests because it fails to create topic partitions when their partitioned topic is not created first.
`testPartitionedTopicAutoCreation, testCompatibilityWithPartitionKeyword`
@codelipenghui @mattisonchao @eolivelli, Please let me know if this change is acceptable. It looks odd that Pulsar allows creating topic partitions, but then it does not allow its partitioned topic creation. Upon topic partition creation, shouldn't we check if the corresponding partitioned topic is created first?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org