You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Rex Wang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/09/16 04:03:58 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4790) Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Rex Wang resolved GERONIMO-4790.
--------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 3.0

> Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-4790
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: console
>    Affects Versions: 2.2
>            Reporter: Rex Wang
>            Assignee: Rex Wang
>             Fix For: 2.2, 3.0
>
>         Attachments: classloader-viewer.jpg, dependency-viewer.jpg, jmx-viewer.jpg, JNDI-viewer.jpg, ldap-viewer.jpg
>
>
> ref http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Which-dojo--p24293149s134.html
> Currently, our console depends on two different versions of dojo library. One is 1.3.0, which is used by EJB portlet and just updated from 1.2.1 (GERONIMO-4723) and fixed a bug(GERONIMO-4746). I hope we can go on updating it to the latest version 1.3.2.
> The other one is 0.4.3, the legacy lib, which has not been supported  by dojo team, but used by our debug-view portlets, I prefer to update it to the latest lib, and the advantage are as follows:
> 1. keep consistent in the portlet page style with the EJB portlet
> 2. reduce a bit to the geronimo footprint size
> 3. Although we have ported the dojo-legacy to build the source in external(GERONIMO-4750), with this update, we don't need that as well.
> 4. will be more easy to maintainance the program logic by using the unified dojo lib.
> 5. the doc of 1.3.x is good and easy to find.
> There are also some risks:
> 1. There has been so much changes between the dojo versions that the effort might be 1-2 week to complete.
> 2. I did not find any documents for the old dojo lib, so it might be easier to re-write the whole pages to base on 1.3.x and dwr 3.0.x(we have upgrade the dwr successfully in GERONIMO-4753), but I not sure.
> Any thoughts?
> -Rex

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.