You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to j-dev@xerces.apache.org by Neil Graham <ne...@ca.ibm.com> on 2004/11/10 21:04:36 UTC

Xerces top-level project: PMC composition and charter

Hi all,

It's been a long time since we tossed this ball around.  It would be 
really cool if we could finally get this into the net, especially with 
ApacheCon so close at hand.

Here's what I think we need to do:

- figure out the composition of the PMC
- choose a Chair for the PMC
- run the draft charter over one more time (I think it's important to 
establish ground rules for the project before we create it)
- pass a motion electing the PMC, ratifying the charter and recommending a 
Chair for the PMC to the Board

So, unless anyone can think of anything else, I propose to do the first 
two in this e-mail.

Originally, I'd hoped that the PMC could simply be composed of all active 
committers.  Largely because these are so numerous, I no longer think 
that's feasible; so I'm asking for folks to step forward and volunteer.

Through off-list discussions relating to how to get this train back on the 
track, I've determined that both Gareth Reakes and Berin Lautenbach are 
interested.  So am I.  Could all other interested parties add their names 
to the following list by 00:00 GMT on Nov. 14?  I'll collate the list.

Proposed Xerces PMC:
Neil Graham
Berin Lautenbach
Gareth Reakes

In terms of a PMC Chair, I'll nominate Gareth.  He's been a Xerces-C 
committer for years, he's a long-time Xerces-J user, and he knows the XML 
space as well as anyone, having presented at who knows how many XML 
conferences.  If anyone else wants to run or nominate someone, please do! 
We can then have an election once we get the charter/PMC formation 
discussion out of the way.  Otherwise, if Gareth accepts, I guess he'll be 
acclaimed.

Now for the charter:  This has been redrafted somewhat since it last made 
the rounds.  Note in particular section 7, which has been strengthened to 
accord with the new realities we face in assessing the pedigree of 
proposed contributions.  If anyone has any feedback, please post it by 
00:00 GMT on Nov. 14.  I'll try and address feedback before bringing this 
to a vote.

As always, feedback most welcome.  If folks like, I'd be happy to split 
the PMC-composition and the charter-adoption motion into two separate 
motions; I just thought of dealing with them at the same time since I view 
their passage as mutually dependent, and it's simply less list traffic. :)

=============== Proposed Xerces Charter ===============

1 INTRODUCTION
==============
1.1 Apache Xerces is a collaborative software development project
dedicated to providing robust, full-featured, commercial-quality, and
freely available XML parsers and closely related technologies 
on a wide variety of platforms supporting several languages.  This
project is managed in cooperation with various individuals worldwide
(both independent and company-affiliated experts), who use the
Internet to communicate, plan, and develop XML software and related
documentation.

1.2 This charter briefly describes the mission, history, organization, and
processes of the project.

2 MISSION
=========
2.1 Apache Xerces exists to promote the use of XML. We view XML as a
compelling paradigm that structures data as information, thereby
facilitating the exchange, transformation, and presentation of
knowledge. The ability to transform raw data into usable information
has great potential to improve the functionality and use of
information systems. We intend to build freely available XML
parsers and closely related technologies in order to engender such 
improvements.

2.2 The Apache Xerces parsers support standard APIs (formal, de facto, 
or proposed). 
They are designed to be high performance, reliable, and easy to use. 
To facilitate easy porting of ideas between languages, the API's supported
should be as similar as possible, given the constraints of the languages 
and existing architectures.  Apache Xerces parsers should also be designed
to work efficiently with other Apache projects that deal
with XML whenever possible.

2.3 We believe that the best way to further these goals 
is by having both individuals and corporations
collaborate on the best possible infrastructure, APIs, code, testing,
and release cycles. Components must be vendor neutral and usable as
core components for all.

2.4 In order to achieve a coherent architecture between Apache Xerces 
parsers
and other components and applications, standards (formal or
de facto) will be used as much as possible for both protocols and
APIs. Where appropriate, experiences and lessons learned will be fed 
back to standards bodies in an effort to assist in the development of 
those standards.  We will also encourage the innovation of new
protocols, APIs, and components in order to seed new concepts not
yet defined by standards.

3 HISTORY
=========
3.1 The Apache Xerces project was originally part of the Apache XML 
Project. 
In late 2004, reflecting the growth both in the Apache
XML project and in Apache Xerces, Apache Xerces became a top-level
Project of the Apache Software Foundation.  However, Apache Xerces still 
shares much infrastructure with the Apache XML project and the 
other former subprojects of Apache XML that have become projects in 
their own right.

4 TERMS
=======
4.1 The ASF Board.  The management board of the Apache Software 
Foundation.

4.2 The Project.  The Apache Xerces Project; intended
to refer to the source code, website and community that are Apache Xerces.

4.3 Subproject.  Apache Xerces is composed of a number of subprojects
which fit into one of two categories:

a) An XML parser implementation in some particular programming 
   language.  There may be multiple parsers for a given
   language, if the API's the parsers support are sufficiently
   dissimilar.  At the time of writing, there is one parser for 
   each of Java, C/C++ and Perl.
b) A set of components serving some purpose not directly 
   pertinent to XML parsing, but which are used in related 
   applications and are tightly bound, usually through internal
   API's, to one (or more) of the parser subprojects. 

4.4 Product.  Some deliverable (usually a binary or source
package) that a subproject releases to the public.  Subprojects
may have multiple products.

4.5 Contributor.  Anyone who makes a contribution to the development
of the Apache Xerces project or a subproject.

4.6 Committer.  Apache Xerces has a set of committers.  Committers
are contributors who have read/write access to the source code
repository. 

5 THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
==================================
5.1 The Apache Xerces project is managed by a core group of
committers known as the Project Management Committee [PMC],
which is composed of volunteers from among the active committers 
(see 8.3 below) from all subprojects.

5.2 The activities of the PMC are coordinated by the Chairperson,
who is an officer of the corporation and reports to the Apache
Board.  The Chairperson will, on the request of the Apache Board, 
provide reports to the Board on issues related  to the running of 
the Apache Xerces project.

5.3 The PMC has the following responsibilities:

a) Accepting new subproject proposals, voting on these
   proposals and creating the
   subproject (see SUBPROJECTS below).  This is done in collaboration
   with the Incubator (see http://incubator.apache.org).
b) Facilitating code or other donations by individuals or companies,
   in collaboration with the Incubator.
c) Resolving license issues and other legal issues in conjunction with
   the ASF board.
d) Ensuring that administrative and infrastructure work is completed.
e) Facilitating relationships among subprojects and other Apache projects.
f) Facilitating relationships between Apache Xerces and the external
   world.
g) Overseeing Apache Xerces to ensure that the mission defined in
   this document is being fulfilled.
h) Resolving conflicts within the project.
i) Reporting to the ASF board (through the Chair) on the progress
   of the project.

5.4 In cases where the sub-project is unable to directly provide 
at least one representative on the PMC--implying that there are no 
active committers on that code base--then the subproject should 
be considered dormant, and any relevant Apache policies for dormant
projects should be implemented.  At the least, the subproject's status 
should
be updated on its website.

5.5 Every 12 months, or at the request of the Board, the PMC will provide 
a recommendation to the Apache Board for the position of Chairperson 
of the PMC. 

5.6 This recommendation will be made on the basis of an election held 
within the PMC.  The election will be performed using a simple
majority vote of PMC members.

5.7 Upon agreement by the Apache Board, the recommended Chairperson will, 
if they are not already, be appointed an officer of the corporation. 
See http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html for more information.

5.8 In the unlikely event that a member of the PMC becomes disruptive to
the process, ceases to make codebase contributions for an extended 
period, or ceases to take part in PMC votes for an extended period of
time, said member may be removed by unanimous vote of remaining PMC 
members.

5.9 The PMC is responsible for maintaining and updating this
charter. Development must follow the process outlined below, so any
change to the development process necessitates a change to the
charter. Changes must be approved by a two-thirds majority of all members 
of the PMC.

6 SUBPROJECTS
=============
6.1 When a new subproject proposal is submitted to the PMC, it
may be accepted by a two-thirds vote of the PMC.

6.2 A subproject may be removed by unanimous vote of the PMC, subject to 
the
approval of the ASF board. 

7 CONTRIBUTORS
==============
7.1 Like all Apache projects, the Apache Xerces project is a meritocracy 
-- 
the more work you do, the more you are allowed to do.  Contributions 
will include participating in mailing lists, reporting bugs, providing 
patches and proposing changes to a product.

7.2 In order to ensure that all code contained in the Apache 
Xerces project's code repository is free of licensing, 
intellectual property and patent issues, any developer wishing 
to contribute a new feature to Xerces must either sign:

a) If contributing as an individual, sign the "Individual 
   Contributor License Agreement (CLA)" 
   (http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt) and file a copy with
   the Secretary of the Corporation; or 
b) If making the contribution as part of their employment
   responsibilities, sign the "Corporate CLA (CCLA)", 
   (http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt) and file a
   copy with the Secretary of the Corporation.

7.3 If the contribution in question is a small bugfix, the
contributor need not sign a CLA, but need only provide the
following information, attaching it to the communication 
containing the patch:

a) Name and employer 
b) Are you the author of the code being conributed? 
c) Do you have the right to grant the copyright and patent 
   licenses for the contribution that are set forth in the ASF v.2.0 
   license (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)?
d) Does your employer have any rights to code that you have 
   written, for example, through your contract for employment?  If 
   so, has your employer given you permission to contribute the code 
   on its behalf or waived its rights in the code? 
e) Are you aware of any third-party licenses or other 
   restrictions (such as related patents or trademarks) that could 
   apply to your contribution?  If so, what are they?

7.4 Contributors who make regular and substantial contributions may become
committers as described below.

8 COMMITTERS
============
8.1 Each subproject has a set of committers. Committers are 
contributors who have read/write access to the source code 
repository. 

8.2 New committers are added once a contributor has been 
nominated by a committer and approved by at least 50 percent of 
the active committers for that subproject with no opposing votes. 
All committers must have a signed Contributor License Agreement 
on file with the Secretary of the Corporation.  Since, in most 
cases, contributors will already have contributed significant 
amounts of code, this should usually have been done before nomination.

8.3 Although committers have write access to all Apache Xerces 
subprojects,
they are only permitted to make changes to the subprojects to which they
have been elected committers.  A committer may be elected to multiple
subprojects, but, except that no new access need be granted, the 
process is the same as for any other contributor.

8.4 For the purposes of voting, committers will be classed as "active" or
"inactive". Only active committers will be included in the totals used to 
determine the success or failure of a particular vote, and
only active committers are part of the PMC.

8.5 Committers remain active as long as they are contributing code or
posting to the subproject mailing lists.  If a committer has neither
contributed code nor posted to the subproject mailing lists in 3
months, the PMC chair may e-mail the 
committer, the subproject development list, and the PMC mailing list 
notifying the committer that they are going to be moved to inactive 
status.  If there is no response in 72 hours, the committer will become 
inactive, and may be removed from the PMC mailing list.

8.6 An inactive status will not prevent a committer committing new code
changes or posting to the mailing lists.  Either of these activities will
automatically re-activate the committer for the purposes of 
voting, and necessitate their addition to the PMC mailing list.

9 INFRASTRUCTURE
================
9.1 The Apache Xerces project relies on the Apache XML project 
and the Apache Infrastructure project for the following:

a) Bug Database -- This is a system for tracking bugs and feature
   requests.

b) Subproject Source Repositories -- These are several repositories
   containing both the source code and documentation for the
   subprojects. 

c) Website -- An xml.apache.org website will contain information about
   the Apache Xerces project, including documentation, downloads of
   releases, and this charter. Each subproject will have its own website
   with subproject information.

d) PMC Mailing List -- This list is for PMC business requiring
   confidentiality, particularly when an individual or company requests
   discretion. All other PMC business should be done on the general
   mailing list.

e) General Mailing List -- This mailing list is open to the public. It is
   intended for discussions that cross subprojects.

f) Subproject Mailing Lists -- Each subproject should have at least one 
devoted mailing
   list. Many subprojects may wish to have both user and development
   lists. The individual subprojects may decide on the exact structure of
   their mailing lists.

10 LICENSING
===========
10.1 All contributions to the Apache Xerces project adhere to the 
Apache Software Foundation License, v.2.0 
(http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)?
All further contributions must be made under the
same terms. 

10.2 When a committer is considering integrating a contribution 
from a contributor who has no CLA on file with the Corporation, 
it is the responsibility of the committer, in consultation with 
the PMC, to conduct due diligence on the pedigree of the 
contribution under consideration; see sections 7.2 and 7.3.

11 THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
==========================
11.1 The development process is intentionally lightweight; like other
Apache projects, the committers decide which changes may be committed
to the repository. Three +1 ('yes' votes) with no -1 ('no' votes or
vetoes) are needed to approve a significant code change. For 
efficiency, some code changes from some contributors (e.g. 
feature additions, bug fixes) may be approved in advance, in 
which case they may be committed first and changed as needed, 
with conflicts resolved by majority vote of the committers.

12 SUBPROJECT REQUIREMENTS
==========================
12.1 Each subproject should have a set of requirements as well as an
up-to-date release plan and design document on its dedicated web page.

12.2 It is recommended that each subproject have a smoke-test system 
that works at least as a basic integration test.

13 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER APACHE PROJECTS
========================================
13.1 The Apache Xerces project should work closely with other Apache
projects, such as XML, Jakarta and the Apache Server, to avoid redundancy
and achieve a coherent architecture among Apache Xerces and these
projects.

Neil Graham
Manager, XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone:  905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
E-mail:  neilg@ca.ibm.com



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: Xerces top-level project: PMC composition and charter

Posted by Neil Graham <ne...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hi Andy,

Andy Clark <an...@cyberneko.net> wrote on 11/12/2004 02:56:54 PM:

> Neil Graham wrote:
> > The only question I'd ask is whether there's even the slightest bit
> > of interest in dragging Crimson into the new project?  That code has
> > been rotting for years; it has no perceptible community and I sure
> > wouldn't like to have to worry about its welfare.  :)
> 
> There's no interest from me. And even the latest Java release
> has switched to Xerces in place of Crimson. So I would move
> that it be put in storage.

Or perhaps we can just not move that it be brought into the Xerces TLP? 
i.e., leave it molder where it is?

> 
> > Also, Andy, would you mind being on the PMC?  As the longest-standing
> >  active Xerces-J committer, and one of the current reps, it would
> > really be great to have you!!
> 
> I don't mind but my time for extra-curriculars is limited. :)

Same here.  Here's hoping this doesn't entail too much work...

> But assuming that the community wants my donation of NekoHTML
> as a new Xerces sub-project, I would become more involved in
> general anyway.

I guess this would need to go through the Incubator?  That seems to be the 
path that all prospective new subprojects (or projects) need to take these 
days.


> 
> P.S. The hyphen "--" in the last sentence appears on a line
> by itself which causes my email client (Thunderbird) to regard
> everything following it as the signature. Not too bothersome
> except that when I reply it doesn't include the signature in
> the reply text.

You can make some e-mail clients happy all of the time, you can make all 
e-mail clients happy some of the time, but you can't make all e-mail 
clients happy all of the time.  :))

Cheers!
Neil


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: Xerces top-level project: PMC composition and charter

Posted by Andy Clark <an...@cyberneko.net>.
Neil Graham wrote:
> The only question I'd ask is whether there's even the slightest bit
> of interest in dragging Crimson into the new project?  That code has
> been rotting for years; it has no perceptible community and I sure
> wouldn't like to have to worry about its welfare.  :)

There's no interest from me. And even the latest Java release
has switched to Xerces in place of Crimson. So I would move
that it be put in storage.

> Below is a diff of the revised charter against what I posted earlier
> this week, as well as the revised document itself.

Looks good.

> Also, Andy, would you mind being on the PMC?  As the longest-standing
>  active Xerces-J committer, and one of the current reps, it would
> really be great to have you!!

I don't mind but my time for extra-curriculars is limited. :)
But assuming that the community wants my donation of NekoHTML
as a new Xerces sub-project, I would become more involved in
general anyway.

> 7 CONTRIBUTORS 
 > ==============
 > 7.1 Like all Apache projects, the Apache Xerces project is a
 > meritocracy -- [...]

P.S. The hyphen "--" in the last sentence appears on a line
by itself which causes my email client (Thunderbird) to regard
everything following it as the signature. Not too bothersome
except that when I reply it doesn't include the signature in
the reply text.

-- 
Andy Clark * andyc@apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: Xerces top-level project: PMC composition and charter

Posted by Neil Graham <ne...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hi Andy,

Thanks for the response!  All your comments seemed entirely reasonable to 
me, and I've addressed them in the attached.  The only question I'd ask is 
whether there's even the slightest bit of interest in dragging Crimson 
into the new project?  That code has been rotting for years; it has no 
perceptible community and I sure wouldn't like to have to worry about its 
welfare.  :)

Below is a diff of the revised charter against what I posted earlier this 
week, as well as the revised document itself.

Also, Andy, would you mind being on the PMC?  As the longest-standing 
active Xerces-J committer, and one of the current reps, it would really be 
great to have you!!  Jason, we'll also need you in order to migrate 
Xerces-Perl; is that all right?

============ diff of changes to charter ===========

--- charter-orig.txt    2004-11-12 09:23:05.423457600 -0500
+++ charter-current.txt 2004-11-12 09:23:16.078779200 -0500
@@ -48,13 +48,18 @@
 
 3 HISTORY
 =========
-3.1 The Apache Xerces project was originally part of the Apache XML 
Project. 
-In late 2004, reflecting the growth both in the Apache
-XML project and in Apache Xerces, Apache Xerces became a top-level
-Project of the Apache Software Foundation.  However, Apache Xerces still 
-shares much infrastructure with the Apache XML project and the 
-other former subprojects of Apache XML that have become projects in 
-their own right.
+3.1 The code base which formed the foundations of both the
+Xerces-Java and Xerces-C++ subprojects of the Apache XML Project
+was originally donated to Apache by IBM in 1999.  Xerces-Perl
+came into existence as a subproject of the Apache XML project
+after the Xerces-C++ community had already matured to a
+significant extent.  All three were subprojects of the Apache XML
+Project until late 2004.  At this time, reflecting the growth in
+the Apache XML project and these communities themselves, Apache
+Xerces became a top-level Project of the Apache Software
+Foundation.  Apache Xerces still shares much infrastructure with
+the Apache XML project and the other former subprojects of Apache
+XML that have become projects in their own right.
 
 4 TERMS
 =======
@@ -93,7 +98,9 @@
 5.1 The Apache Xerces project is managed by a core group of
 committers known as the Project Management Committee [PMC],
 which is composed of volunteers from among the active committers 
-(see 8.3 below) from all subprojects.
+(see 8.3 below) from all subprojects.  Each subproject must have
+at least one representative on the PMC, to ensure active
+supervision of the subproject.
 
 5.2 The activities of the PMC are coordinated by the Chairperson,
 who is an officer of the corporation and reports to the Apache
@@ -208,13 +215,17 @@
 contributors who have read/write access to the source code 
 repository. 
 
-8.2 New committers are added once a contributor has been 
-nominated by a committer and approved by at least 50 percent of 
-the active committers for that subproject with no opposing votes. 
-All committers must have a signed Contributor License Agreement 
-on file with the Secretary of the Corporation.  Since, in most 
-cases, contributors will already have contributed significant 
-amounts of code, this should usually have been done before nomination.
+8.2 Normally, a new committer is added after a contributor has
+been nominated by a committer and approved by at least 50 percent
+of the active committers for that subproject with no opposing
+votes.  In the case that a subproject has a very small number of
+active committers, the PMC may choose to require a PMC resolution
+to approve the nomination of a contributor by one of the active
+committers in that subproject.  All committers must have a signed
+Contributor License Agreement on file with the Secretary of the
+Corporation.  Since, in most cases, contributors will already
+have contributed significant amounts of code, this should usually
+have been done before nomination.
 
 8.3 Although committers have write access to all Apache Xerces 
subprojects,
 they are only permitted to make changes to the subprojects to which they
@@ -253,7 +264,7 @@
    containing both the source code and documentation for the
    subprojects. 
 
-c) Website -- An xml.apache.org website will contain information about
+c) Website -- A xerces.apache.org website will contain information about
    the Apache Xerces project, including documentation, downloads of
    releases, and this charter. Each subproject will have its own website
    with subproject information.
 
=========== revised charter ================

1 INTRODUCTION
==============
1.1 Apache Xerces is a collaborative software development project
dedicated to providing robust, full-featured, commercial-quality, and
freely available XML parsers and closely related technologies 
on a wide variety of platforms supporting several languages.  This
project is managed in cooperation with various individuals worldwide
(both independent and company-affiliated experts), who use the
Internet to communicate, plan, and develop XML software and related
documentation.

1.2 This charter briefly describes the mission, history, organization, and
processes of the project.

2 MISSION
=========
2.1 Apache Xerces exists to promote the use of XML. We view XML as a
compelling paradigm that structures data as information, thereby
facilitating the exchange, transformation, and presentation of
knowledge. The ability to transform raw data into usable information
has great potential to improve the functionality and use of
information systems. We intend to build freely available XML
parsers and closely related technologies in order to engender such 
improvements.

2.2 The Apache Xerces parsers support standard APIs (formal, de facto, 
or proposed). 
They are designed to be high performance, reliable, and easy to use. 
To facilitate easy porting of ideas between languages, the API's supported
should be as similar as possible, given the constraints of the languages 
and existing architectures.  Apache Xerces parsers should also be designed
to work efficiently with other Apache projects that deal
with XML whenever possible.

2.3 We believe that the best way to further these goals 
is by having both individuals and corporations
collaborate on the best possible infrastructure, APIs, code, testing,
and release cycles. Components must be vendor neutral and usable as
core components for all.

2.4 In order to achieve a coherent architecture between Apache Xerces 
parsers
and other components and applications, standards (formal or
de facto) will be used as much as possible for both protocols and
APIs. Where appropriate, experiences and lessons learned will be fed 
back to standards bodies in an effort to assist in the development of 
those standards.  We will also encourage the innovation of new
protocols, APIs, and components in order to seed new concepts not
yet defined by standards.

3 HISTORY
=========
3.1 The code base which formed the foundations of both the
Xerces-Java and Xerces-C++ subprojects of the Apache XML Project
was originally donated to Apache by IBM in 1999.  Xerces-Perl
came into existence as a subproject of the Apache XML project
after the Xerces-C++ community had already matured to a
significant extent.  All three were subprojects of the Apache XML
Project until late 2004.  At this time, reflecting the growth in
the Apache XML project and these communities themselves, Apache
Xerces became a top-level Project of the Apache Software
Foundation.  Apache Xerces still shares much infrastructure with
the Apache XML project and the other former subprojects of Apache
XML that have become projects in their own right.

4 TERMS
=======
4.1 The ASF Board.  The management board of the Apache Software 
Foundation.

4.2 The Project.  The Apache Xerces Project; intended
to refer to the source code, website and community that are Apache Xerces.

4.3 Subproject.  Apache Xerces is composed of a number of subprojects
which fit into one of two categories:

a) An XML parser implementation in some particular programming 
   language.  There may be multiple parsers for a given
   language, if the API's the parsers support are sufficiently
   dissimilar.  At the time of writing, there is one parser for 
   each of Java, C/C++ and Perl.
b) A set of components serving some purpose not directly 
   pertinent to XML parsing, but which are used in related 
   applications and are tightly bound, usually through internal
   API's, to one (or more) of the parser subprojects. 

4.4 Product.  Some deliverable (usually a binary or source
package) that a subproject releases to the public.  Subprojects
may have multiple products.

4.5 Contributor.  Anyone who makes a contribution to the development
of the Apache Xerces project or a subproject.

4.6 Committer.  Apache Xerces has a set of committers.  Committers
are contributors who have read/write access to the source code
repository. 

5 THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
==================================
5.1 The Apache Xerces project is managed by a core group of
committers known as the Project Management Committee [PMC],
which is composed of volunteers from among the active committers 
(see 8.3 below) from all subprojects.  Each subproject must have
at least one representative on the PMC, to ensure active
supervision of the subproject.

5.2 The activities of the PMC are coordinated by the Chairperson,
who is an officer of the corporation and reports to the Apache
Board.  The Chairperson will, on the request of the Apache Board, 
provide reports to the Board on issues related  to the running of 
the Apache Xerces project.

5.3 The PMC has the following responsibilities:

a) Accepting new subproject proposals, voting on these
   proposals and creating the
   subproject (see SUBPROJECTS below).  This is done in collaboration
   with the Incubator (see http://incubator.apache.org).
b) Facilitating code or other donations by individuals or companies,
   in collaboration with the Incubator.
c) Resolving license issues and other legal issues in conjunction with
   the ASF board.
d) Ensuring that administrative and infrastructure work is completed.
e) Facilitating relationships among subprojects and other Apache projects.
f) Facilitating relationships between Apache Xerces and the external
   world.
g) Overseeing Apache Xerces to ensure that the mission defined in
   this document is being fulfilled.
h) Resolving conflicts within the project.
i) Reporting to the ASF board (through the Chair) on the progress
   of the project.

5.4 In cases where the sub-project is unable to directly provide 
at least one representative on the PMC--implying that there are no 
active committers on that code base--then the subproject should 
be considered dormant, and any relevant Apache policies for dormant
projects should be implemented.  At the least, the subproject's status 
should
be updated on its website.

5.5 Every 12 months, or at the request of the Board, the PMC will provide 
a recommendation to the Apache Board for the position of Chairperson 
of the PMC. 

5.6 This recommendation will be made on the basis of an election held 
within the PMC.  The election will be performed using a simple
majority vote of PMC members.

5.7 Upon agreement by the Apache Board, the recommended Chairperson will, 
if they are not already, be appointed an officer of the corporation. 
See http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html for more information.

5.8 In the unlikely event that a member of the PMC becomes disruptive to
the process, ceases to make codebase contributions for an extended 
period, or ceases to take part in PMC votes for an extended period of
time, said member may be removed by unanimous vote of remaining PMC 
members.

5.9 The PMC is responsible for maintaining and updating this
charter. Development must follow the process outlined below, so any
change to the development process necessitates a change to the
charter. Changes must be approved by a two-thirds majority of all members 
of the PMC.

6 SUBPROJECTS
=============
6.1 When a new subproject proposal is submitted to the PMC, it
may be accepted by a two-thirds vote of the PMC.

6.2 A subproject may be removed by unanimous vote of the PMC, subject to 
the
approval of the ASF board. 

7 CONTRIBUTORS
==============
7.1 Like all Apache projects, the Apache Xerces project is a meritocracy 
-- 
the more work you do, the more you are allowed to do.  Contributions 
will include participating in mailing lists, reporting bugs, providing 
patches and proposing changes to a product.

7.2 In order to ensure that all code contained in the Apache 
Xerces project's code repository is free of licensing, 
intellectual property and patent issues, any developer wishing 
to contribute a new feature to Xerces must either sign:

a) If contributing as an individual, sign the "Individual 
   Contributor License Agreement (CLA)" 
   (http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt) and file a copy with
   the Secretary of the Corporation; or 
b) If making the contribution as part of their employment
   responsibilities, sign the "Corporate CLA (CCLA)", 
   (http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt) and file a
   copy with the Secretary of the Corporation.

7.3 If the contribution in question is a small bugfix, the
contributor need not sign a CLA, but need only provide the
following information, attaching it to the communication 
containing the patch:

a) Name and employer 
b) Are you the author of the code being conributed? 
c) Do you have the right to grant the copyright and patent 
   licenses for the contribution that are set forth in the ASF v.2.0 
   license (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)?
d) Does your employer have any rights to code that you have 
   written, for example, through your contract for employment?  If 
   so, has your employer given you permission to contribute the code 
   on its behalf or waived its rights in the code? 
e) Are you aware of any third-party licenses or other 
   restrictions (such as related patents or trademarks) that could 
   apply to your contribution?  If so, what are they?

7.4 Contributors who make regular and substantial contributions may become
committers as described below.

8 COMMITTERS
============
8.1 Each subproject has a set of committers. Committers are 
contributors who have read/write access to the source code 
repository. 

8.2 Normally, a new committer is added after a contributor has
been nominated by a committer and approved by at least 50 percent
of the active committers for that subproject with no opposing
votes.  In the case that a subproject has a very small number of
active committers, the PMC may choose to require a PMC resolution
to approve the nomination of a contributor by one of the active
committers in that subproject.  All committers must have a signed
Contributor License Agreement on file with the Secretary of the
Corporation.  Since, in most cases, contributors will already
have contributed significant amounts of code, this should usually
have been done before nomination.

8.3 Although committers have write access to all Apache Xerces 
subprojects,
they are only permitted to make changes to the subprojects to which they
have been elected committers.  A committer may be elected to multiple
subprojects, but, except that no new access need be granted, the 
process is the same as for any other contributor.

8.4 For the purposes of voting, committers will be classed as "active" or
"inactive". Only active committers will be included in the totals used to 
determine the success or failure of a particular vote, and
only active committers are part of the PMC.

8.5 Committers remain active as long as they are contributing code or
posting to the subproject mailing lists.  If a committer has neither
contributed code nor posted to the subproject mailing lists in 3
months, the PMC chair may e-mail the 
committer, the subproject development list, and the PMC mailing list 
notifying the committer that they are going to be moved to inactive 
status.  If there is no response in 72 hours, the committer will become 
inactive, and may be removed from the PMC mailing list.

8.6 An inactive status will not prevent a committer committing new code
changes or posting to the mailing lists.  Either of these activities will
automatically re-activate the committer for the purposes of 
voting, and necessitate their addition to the PMC mailing list.

9 INFRASTRUCTURE
================
9.1 The Apache Xerces project relies on the Apache XML project 
and the Apache Infrastructure project for the following:

a) Bug Database -- This is a system for tracking bugs and feature
   requests.

b) Subproject Source Repositories -- These are several repositories
   containing both the source code and documentation for the
   subprojects. 

c) Website -- A xerces.apache.org website will contain information about
   the Apache Xerces project, including documentation, downloads of
   releases, and this charter. Each subproject will have its own website
   with subproject information.

d) PMC Mailing List -- This list is for PMC business requiring
   confidentiality, particularly when an individual or company requests
   discretion. All other PMC business should be done on the general
   mailing list.

e) General Mailing List -- This mailing list is open to the public. It is
   intended for discussions that cross subprojects.

f) Subproject Mailing Lists -- Each subproject should have at least one 
devoted mailing
   list. Many subprojects may wish to have both user and development
   lists. The individual subprojects may decide on the exact structure of
   their mailing lists.

10 LICENSING
===========
10.1 All contributions to the Apache Xerces project adhere to the 
Apache Software Foundation License, v.2.0 
(http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)?
All further contributions must be made under the
same terms. 

10.2 When a committer is considering integrating a contribution 
from a contributor who has no CLA on file with the Corporation, 
it is the responsibility of the committer, in consultation with 
the PMC, to conduct due diligence on the pedigree of the 
contribution under consideration; see sections 7.2 and 7.3.

11 THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
==========================
11.1 The development process is intentionally lightweight; like other
Apache projects, the committers decide which changes may be committed
to the repository. Three +1 ('yes' votes) with no -1 ('no' votes or
vetoes) are needed to approve a significant code change. For 
efficiency, some code changes from some contributors (e.g. 
feature additions, bug fixes) may be approved in advance, in 
which case they may be committed first and changed as needed, 
with conflicts resolved by majority vote of the committers.

12 SUBPROJECT REQUIREMENTS
==========================
12.1 Each subproject should have a set of requirements as well as an
up-to-date release plan and design document on its dedicated web page.

12.2 It is recommended that each subproject have a smoke-test system 
that works at least as a basic integration test.

13 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER APACHE PROJECTS
========================================
13.1 The Apache Xerces project should work closely with other Apache
projects, such as XML, Jakarta and the Apache Server, to avoid redundancy
and achieve a coherent architecture among Apache Xerces and these
projects.


Neil Graham
Manager, XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone:  905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
E-mail:  neilg@ca.ibm.com



Andy Clark <an...@cyberneko.net> wrote on 11/11/2004 02:25:01 PM:

> Neil Graham wrote:
> > It's been a long time since we tossed this ball around.  It would be 
> > really cool if we could finally get this into the net, especially with 

> > ApacheCon so close at hand.
> 
> Yay! Thanks, Neil, for taking this on (again). :)
> 
> I've read over your email and just have some minor comments
> and questions. Otherwise, it looks really good.
> 
> > Proposed Xerces PMC:
> > Neil Graham
> > Berin Lautenbach
> > Gareth Reakes
> 
> I would suggest listing the sub-project of each proposed
> PMC member as well. Also, the opening text of the PMC section
> in the proposed charter doesn't make it clear that each sub-
> project needs to have a representative on the PMC; it only
> says that PMC representatives will be taken from all the
> active sub-projects. This is described in detail in 5.4 but
> I would reword the opening text to make it more clear on
> this point.
> 
> > =============== Proposed Xerces Charter ===============
> > [...]
> > 3 HISTORY
> > =========
> 
> The History section says nothing about IBM's contribution
> to the founding of the Apache XML Project. And I think it
> should. I don't want their contribution forgotten since it
> was so important to the success of this project at Apache.
> 
> > 4 TERMS
> > =======
> > [...]
> > 4.3 Subproject.  Apache Xerces is composed of a number of subprojects
> > which fit into one of two categories:
> 
> This part looks good. I know we went back and forth about
> the definition of a "sub-project" in previous discussions
> so I'm happy to see this resolved and defined so well in
> this proposed charter.
> 
> > a) An XML parser implementation in some particular programming 
>  >    [...]
> >    dissimilar.  At the time of writing, there is one parser for 
> >    each of Java, C/C++ and Perl.
> 
> Does this imply that we are dropping Crimson from the
> active development branch?
> 
> > 8 COMMITTERS
> > ============
> > [...]
> > 
> > 8.2 New committers are added once a contributor has been 
> > nominated by a committer and approved by at least 50 percent of 
> > the active committers for that subproject with no opposing votes. 
> 
> Some of the newer sub-projects will be quite small. So do we
> want to make the vote only by the active committers of that
> sub-project?
> 
> > 9 INFRASTRUCTURE
> > ================
> > 9.1 The Apache Xerces project relies on the Apache XML project 
> > [...]
> > 
> > c) Website -- An xml.apache.org website will contain information about
> 
> Should this be "xerces.apache.org"?
> 
> -- 
> Andy Clark * andyc@apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: Xerces top-level project: PMC composition and charter

Posted by Neil Graham <ne...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hi Andy,

Thanks for the response!  All your comments seemed entirely reasonable to 
me, and I've addressed them in the attached.  The only question I'd ask is 
whether there's even the slightest bit of interest in dragging Crimson 
into the new project?  That code has been rotting for years; it has no 
perceptible community and I sure wouldn't like to have to worry about its 
welfare.  :)

Below is a diff of the revised charter against what I posted earlier this 
week, as well as the revised document itself.

Also, Andy, would you mind being on the PMC?  As the longest-standing 
active Xerces-J committer, and one of the current reps, it would really be 
great to have you!!  Jason, we'll also need you in order to migrate 
Xerces-Perl; is that all right?

============ diff of changes to charter ===========

--- charter-orig.txt    2004-11-12 09:23:05.423457600 -0500
+++ charter-current.txt 2004-11-12 09:23:16.078779200 -0500
@@ -48,13 +48,18 @@
 
 3 HISTORY
 =========
-3.1 The Apache Xerces project was originally part of the Apache XML 
Project. 
-In late 2004, reflecting the growth both in the Apache
-XML project and in Apache Xerces, Apache Xerces became a top-level
-Project of the Apache Software Foundation.  However, Apache Xerces still 
-shares much infrastructure with the Apache XML project and the 
-other former subprojects of Apache XML that have become projects in 
-their own right.
+3.1 The code base which formed the foundations of both the
+Xerces-Java and Xerces-C++ subprojects of the Apache XML Project
+was originally donated to Apache by IBM in 1999.  Xerces-Perl
+came into existence as a subproject of the Apache XML project
+after the Xerces-C++ community had already matured to a
+significant extent.  All three were subprojects of the Apache XML
+Project until late 2004.  At this time, reflecting the growth in
+the Apache XML project and these communities themselves, Apache
+Xerces became a top-level Project of the Apache Software
+Foundation.  Apache Xerces still shares much infrastructure with
+the Apache XML project and the other former subprojects of Apache
+XML that have become projects in their own right.
 
 4 TERMS
 =======
@@ -93,7 +98,9 @@
 5.1 The Apache Xerces project is managed by a core group of
 committers known as the Project Management Committee [PMC],
 which is composed of volunteers from among the active committers 
-(see 8.3 below) from all subprojects.
+(see 8.3 below) from all subprojects.  Each subproject must have
+at least one representative on the PMC, to ensure active
+supervision of the subproject.
 
 5.2 The activities of the PMC are coordinated by the Chairperson,
 who is an officer of the corporation and reports to the Apache
@@ -208,13 +215,17 @@
 contributors who have read/write access to the source code 
 repository. 
 
-8.2 New committers are added once a contributor has been 
-nominated by a committer and approved by at least 50 percent of 
-the active committers for that subproject with no opposing votes. 
-All committers must have a signed Contributor License Agreement 
-on file with the Secretary of the Corporation.  Since, in most 
-cases, contributors will already have contributed significant 
-amounts of code, this should usually have been done before nomination.
+8.2 Normally, a new committer is added after a contributor has
+been nominated by a committer and approved by at least 50 percent
+of the active committers for that subproject with no opposing
+votes.  In the case that a subproject has a very small number of
+active committers, the PMC may choose to require a PMC resolution
+to approve the nomination of a contributor by one of the active
+committers in that subproject.  All committers must have a signed
+Contributor License Agreement on file with the Secretary of the
+Corporation.  Since, in most cases, contributors will already
+have contributed significant amounts of code, this should usually
+have been done before nomination.
 
 8.3 Although committers have write access to all Apache Xerces 
subprojects,
 they are only permitted to make changes to the subprojects to which they
@@ -253,7 +264,7 @@
    containing both the source code and documentation for the
    subprojects. 
 
-c) Website -- An xml.apache.org website will contain information about
+c) Website -- A xerces.apache.org website will contain information about
    the Apache Xerces project, including documentation, downloads of
    releases, and this charter. Each subproject will have its own website
    with subproject information.
 
=========== revised charter ================

1 INTRODUCTION
==============
1.1 Apache Xerces is a collaborative software development project
dedicated to providing robust, full-featured, commercial-quality, and
freely available XML parsers and closely related technologies 
on a wide variety of platforms supporting several languages.  This
project is managed in cooperation with various individuals worldwide
(both independent and company-affiliated experts), who use the
Internet to communicate, plan, and develop XML software and related
documentation.

1.2 This charter briefly describes the mission, history, organization, and
processes of the project.

2 MISSION
=========
2.1 Apache Xerces exists to promote the use of XML. We view XML as a
compelling paradigm that structures data as information, thereby
facilitating the exchange, transformation, and presentation of
knowledge. The ability to transform raw data into usable information
has great potential to improve the functionality and use of
information systems. We intend to build freely available XML
parsers and closely related technologies in order to engender such 
improvements.

2.2 The Apache Xerces parsers support standard APIs (formal, de facto, 
or proposed). 
They are designed to be high performance, reliable, and easy to use. 
To facilitate easy porting of ideas between languages, the API's supported
should be as similar as possible, given the constraints of the languages 
and existing architectures.  Apache Xerces parsers should also be designed
to work efficiently with other Apache projects that deal
with XML whenever possible.

2.3 We believe that the best way to further these goals 
is by having both individuals and corporations
collaborate on the best possible infrastructure, APIs, code, testing,
and release cycles. Components must be vendor neutral and usable as
core components for all.

2.4 In order to achieve a coherent architecture between Apache Xerces 
parsers
and other components and applications, standards (formal or
de facto) will be used as much as possible for both protocols and
APIs. Where appropriate, experiences and lessons learned will be fed 
back to standards bodies in an effort to assist in the development of 
those standards.  We will also encourage the innovation of new
protocols, APIs, and components in order to seed new concepts not
yet defined by standards.

3 HISTORY
=========
3.1 The code base which formed the foundations of both the
Xerces-Java and Xerces-C++ subprojects of the Apache XML Project
was originally donated to Apache by IBM in 1999.  Xerces-Perl
came into existence as a subproject of the Apache XML project
after the Xerces-C++ community had already matured to a
significant extent.  All three were subprojects of the Apache XML
Project until late 2004.  At this time, reflecting the growth in
the Apache XML project and these communities themselves, Apache
Xerces became a top-level Project of the Apache Software
Foundation.  Apache Xerces still shares much infrastructure with
the Apache XML project and the other former subprojects of Apache
XML that have become projects in their own right.

4 TERMS
=======
4.1 The ASF Board.  The management board of the Apache Software 
Foundation.

4.2 The Project.  The Apache Xerces Project; intended
to refer to the source code, website and community that are Apache Xerces.

4.3 Subproject.  Apache Xerces is composed of a number of subprojects
which fit into one of two categories:

a) An XML parser implementation in some particular programming 
   language.  There may be multiple parsers for a given
   language, if the API's the parsers support are sufficiently
   dissimilar.  At the time of writing, there is one parser for 
   each of Java, C/C++ and Perl.
b) A set of components serving some purpose not directly 
   pertinent to XML parsing, but which are used in related 
   applications and are tightly bound, usually through internal
   API's, to one (or more) of the parser subprojects. 

4.4 Product.  Some deliverable (usually a binary or source
package) that a subproject releases to the public.  Subprojects
may have multiple products.

4.5 Contributor.  Anyone who makes a contribution to the development
of the Apache Xerces project or a subproject.

4.6 Committer.  Apache Xerces has a set of committers.  Committers
are contributors who have read/write access to the source code
repository. 

5 THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
==================================
5.1 The Apache Xerces project is managed by a core group of
committers known as the Project Management Committee [PMC],
which is composed of volunteers from among the active committers 
(see 8.3 below) from all subprojects.  Each subproject must have
at least one representative on the PMC, to ensure active
supervision of the subproject.

5.2 The activities of the PMC are coordinated by the Chairperson,
who is an officer of the corporation and reports to the Apache
Board.  The Chairperson will, on the request of the Apache Board, 
provide reports to the Board on issues related  to the running of 
the Apache Xerces project.

5.3 The PMC has the following responsibilities:

a) Accepting new subproject proposals, voting on these
   proposals and creating the
   subproject (see SUBPROJECTS below).  This is done in collaboration
   with the Incubator (see http://incubator.apache.org).
b) Facilitating code or other donations by individuals or companies,
   in collaboration with the Incubator.
c) Resolving license issues and other legal issues in conjunction with
   the ASF board.
d) Ensuring that administrative and infrastructure work is completed.
e) Facilitating relationships among subprojects and other Apache projects.
f) Facilitating relationships between Apache Xerces and the external
   world.
g) Overseeing Apache Xerces to ensure that the mission defined in
   this document is being fulfilled.
h) Resolving conflicts within the project.
i) Reporting to the ASF board (through the Chair) on the progress
   of the project.

5.4 In cases where the sub-project is unable to directly provide 
at least one representative on the PMC--implying that there are no 
active committers on that code base--then the subproject should 
be considered dormant, and any relevant Apache policies for dormant
projects should be implemented.  At the least, the subproject's status 
should
be updated on its website.

5.5 Every 12 months, or at the request of the Board, the PMC will provide 
a recommendation to the Apache Board for the position of Chairperson 
of the PMC. 

5.6 This recommendation will be made on the basis of an election held 
within the PMC.  The election will be performed using a simple
majority vote of PMC members.

5.7 Upon agreement by the Apache Board, the recommended Chairperson will, 
if they are not already, be appointed an officer of the corporation. 
See http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html for more information.

5.8 In the unlikely event that a member of the PMC becomes disruptive to
the process, ceases to make codebase contributions for an extended 
period, or ceases to take part in PMC votes for an extended period of
time, said member may be removed by unanimous vote of remaining PMC 
members.

5.9 The PMC is responsible for maintaining and updating this
charter. Development must follow the process outlined below, so any
change to the development process necessitates a change to the
charter. Changes must be approved by a two-thirds majority of all members 
of the PMC.

6 SUBPROJECTS
=============
6.1 When a new subproject proposal is submitted to the PMC, it
may be accepted by a two-thirds vote of the PMC.

6.2 A subproject may be removed by unanimous vote of the PMC, subject to 
the
approval of the ASF board. 

7 CONTRIBUTORS
==============
7.1 Like all Apache projects, the Apache Xerces project is a meritocracy 
-- 
the more work you do, the more you are allowed to do.  Contributions 
will include participating in mailing lists, reporting bugs, providing 
patches and proposing changes to a product.

7.2 In order to ensure that all code contained in the Apache 
Xerces project's code repository is free of licensing, 
intellectual property and patent issues, any developer wishing 
to contribute a new feature to Xerces must either sign:

a) If contributing as an individual, sign the "Individual 
   Contributor License Agreement (CLA)" 
   (http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt) and file a copy with
   the Secretary of the Corporation; or 
b) If making the contribution as part of their employment
   responsibilities, sign the "Corporate CLA (CCLA)", 
   (http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt) and file a
   copy with the Secretary of the Corporation.

7.3 If the contribution in question is a small bugfix, the
contributor need not sign a CLA, but need only provide the
following information, attaching it to the communication 
containing the patch:

a) Name and employer 
b) Are you the author of the code being conributed? 
c) Do you have the right to grant the copyright and patent 
   licenses for the contribution that are set forth in the ASF v.2.0 
   license (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)?
d) Does your employer have any rights to code that you have 
   written, for example, through your contract for employment?  If 
   so, has your employer given you permission to contribute the code 
   on its behalf or waived its rights in the code? 
e) Are you aware of any third-party licenses or other 
   restrictions (such as related patents or trademarks) that could 
   apply to your contribution?  If so, what are they?

7.4 Contributors who make regular and substantial contributions may become
committers as described below.

8 COMMITTERS
============
8.1 Each subproject has a set of committers. Committers are 
contributors who have read/write access to the source code 
repository. 

8.2 Normally, a new committer is added after a contributor has
been nominated by a committer and approved by at least 50 percent
of the active committers for that subproject with no opposing
votes.  In the case that a subproject has a very small number of
active committers, the PMC may choose to require a PMC resolution
to approve the nomination of a contributor by one of the active
committers in that subproject.  All committers must have a signed
Contributor License Agreement on file with the Secretary of the
Corporation.  Since, in most cases, contributors will already
have contributed significant amounts of code, this should usually
have been done before nomination.

8.3 Although committers have write access to all Apache Xerces 
subprojects,
they are only permitted to make changes to the subprojects to which they
have been elected committers.  A committer may be elected to multiple
subprojects, but, except that no new access need be granted, the 
process is the same as for any other contributor.

8.4 For the purposes of voting, committers will be classed as "active" or
"inactive". Only active committers will be included in the totals used to 
determine the success or failure of a particular vote, and
only active committers are part of the PMC.

8.5 Committers remain active as long as they are contributing code or
posting to the subproject mailing lists.  If a committer has neither
contributed code nor posted to the subproject mailing lists in 3
months, the PMC chair may e-mail the 
committer, the subproject development list, and the PMC mailing list 
notifying the committer that they are going to be moved to inactive 
status.  If there is no response in 72 hours, the committer will become 
inactive, and may be removed from the PMC mailing list.

8.6 An inactive status will not prevent a committer committing new code
changes or posting to the mailing lists.  Either of these activities will
automatically re-activate the committer for the purposes of 
voting, and necessitate their addition to the PMC mailing list.

9 INFRASTRUCTURE
================
9.1 The Apache Xerces project relies on the Apache XML project 
and the Apache Infrastructure project for the following:

a) Bug Database -- This is a system for tracking bugs and feature
   requests.

b) Subproject Source Repositories -- These are several repositories
   containing both the source code and documentation for the
   subprojects. 

c) Website -- A xerces.apache.org website will contain information about
   the Apache Xerces project, including documentation, downloads of
   releases, and this charter. Each subproject will have its own website
   with subproject information.

d) PMC Mailing List -- This list is for PMC business requiring
   confidentiality, particularly when an individual or company requests
   discretion. All other PMC business should be done on the general
   mailing list.

e) General Mailing List -- This mailing list is open to the public. It is
   intended for discussions that cross subprojects.

f) Subproject Mailing Lists -- Each subproject should have at least one 
devoted mailing
   list. Many subprojects may wish to have both user and development
   lists. The individual subprojects may decide on the exact structure of
   their mailing lists.

10 LICENSING
===========
10.1 All contributions to the Apache Xerces project adhere to the 
Apache Software Foundation License, v.2.0 
(http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)?
All further contributions must be made under the
same terms. 

10.2 When a committer is considering integrating a contribution 
from a contributor who has no CLA on file with the Corporation, 
it is the responsibility of the committer, in consultation with 
the PMC, to conduct due diligence on the pedigree of the 
contribution under consideration; see sections 7.2 and 7.3.

11 THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
==========================
11.1 The development process is intentionally lightweight; like other
Apache projects, the committers decide which changes may be committed
to the repository. Three +1 ('yes' votes) with no -1 ('no' votes or
vetoes) are needed to approve a significant code change. For 
efficiency, some code changes from some contributors (e.g. 
feature additions, bug fixes) may be approved in advance, in 
which case they may be committed first and changed as needed, 
with conflicts resolved by majority vote of the committers.

12 SUBPROJECT REQUIREMENTS
==========================
12.1 Each subproject should have a set of requirements as well as an
up-to-date release plan and design document on its dedicated web page.

12.2 It is recommended that each subproject have a smoke-test system 
that works at least as a basic integration test.

13 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER APACHE PROJECTS
========================================
13.1 The Apache Xerces project should work closely with other Apache
projects, such as XML, Jakarta and the Apache Server, to avoid redundancy
and achieve a coherent architecture among Apache Xerces and these
projects.


Neil Graham
Manager, XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone:  905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
E-mail:  neilg@ca.ibm.com



Andy Clark <an...@cyberneko.net> wrote on 11/11/2004 02:25:01 PM:

> Neil Graham wrote:
> > It's been a long time since we tossed this ball around.  It would be 
> > really cool if we could finally get this into the net, especially with 

> > ApacheCon so close at hand.
> 
> Yay! Thanks, Neil, for taking this on (again). :)
> 
> I've read over your email and just have some minor comments
> and questions. Otherwise, it looks really good.
> 
> > Proposed Xerces PMC:
> > Neil Graham
> > Berin Lautenbach
> > Gareth Reakes
> 
> I would suggest listing the sub-project of each proposed
> PMC member as well. Also, the opening text of the PMC section
> in the proposed charter doesn't make it clear that each sub-
> project needs to have a representative on the PMC; it only
> says that PMC representatives will be taken from all the
> active sub-projects. This is described in detail in 5.4 but
> I would reword the opening text to make it more clear on
> this point.
> 
> > =============== Proposed Xerces Charter ===============
> > [...]
> > 3 HISTORY
> > =========
> 
> The History section says nothing about IBM's contribution
> to the founding of the Apache XML Project. And I think it
> should. I don't want their contribution forgotten since it
> was so important to the success of this project at Apache.
> 
> > 4 TERMS
> > =======
> > [...]
> > 4.3 Subproject.  Apache Xerces is composed of a number of subprojects
> > which fit into one of two categories:
> 
> This part looks good. I know we went back and forth about
> the definition of a "sub-project" in previous discussions
> so I'm happy to see this resolved and defined so well in
> this proposed charter.
> 
> > a) An XML parser implementation in some particular programming 
>  >    [...]
> >    dissimilar.  At the time of writing, there is one parser for 
> >    each of Java, C/C++ and Perl.
> 
> Does this imply that we are dropping Crimson from the
> active development branch?
> 
> > 8 COMMITTERS
> > ============
> > [...]
> > 
> > 8.2 New committers are added once a contributor has been 
> > nominated by a committer and approved by at least 50 percent of 
> > the active committers for that subproject with no opposing votes. 
> 
> Some of the newer sub-projects will be quite small. So do we
> want to make the vote only by the active committers of that
> sub-project?
> 
> > 9 INFRASTRUCTURE
> > ================
> > 9.1 The Apache Xerces project relies on the Apache XML project 
> > [...]
> > 
> > c) Website -- An xml.apache.org website will contain information about
> 
> Should this be "xerces.apache.org"?
> 
> -- 
> Andy Clark * andyc@apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: Xerces top-level project: PMC composition and charter

Posted by Andy Clark <an...@cyberneko.net>.
Neil Graham wrote:
> It's been a long time since we tossed this ball around.  It would be 
> really cool if we could finally get this into the net, especially with 
> ApacheCon so close at hand.

Yay! Thanks, Neil, for taking this on (again). :)

I've read over your email and just have some minor comments
and questions. Otherwise, it looks really good.

> Proposed Xerces PMC:
> Neil Graham
> Berin Lautenbach
> Gareth Reakes

I would suggest listing the sub-project of each proposed
PMC member as well. Also, the opening text of the PMC section
in the proposed charter doesn't make it clear that each sub-
project needs to have a representative on the PMC; it only
says that PMC representatives will be taken from all the
active sub-projects. This is described in detail in 5.4 but
I would reword the opening text to make it more clear on
this point.

> =============== Proposed Xerces Charter ===============
> [...]
> 3 HISTORY
> =========

The History section says nothing about IBM's contribution
to the founding of the Apache XML Project. And I think it
should. I don't want their contribution forgotten since it
was so important to the success of this project at Apache.

> 4 TERMS
> =======
> [...]
> 4.3 Subproject.  Apache Xerces is composed of a number of subprojects
> which fit into one of two categories:

This part looks good. I know we went back and forth about
the definition of a "sub-project" in previous discussions
so I'm happy to see this resolved and defined so well in
this proposed charter.

> a) An XML parser implementation in some particular programming 
 >    [...]
>    dissimilar.  At the time of writing, there is one parser for 
>    each of Java, C/C++ and Perl.

Does this imply that we are dropping Crimson from the
active development branch?

> 8 COMMITTERS
> ============
> [...]
> 
> 8.2 New committers are added once a contributor has been 
> nominated by a committer and approved by at least 50 percent of 
> the active committers for that subproject with no opposing votes. 

Some of the newer sub-projects will be quite small. So do we
want to make the vote only by the active committers of that
sub-project?

> 9 INFRASTRUCTURE
> ================
> 9.1 The Apache Xerces project relies on the Apache XML project 
> [...]
> 
> c) Website -- An xml.apache.org website will contain information about

Should this be "xerces.apache.org"?

-- 
Andy Clark * andyc@apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: Xerces top-level project: PMC composition and charter

Posted by Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hello Neil,

I'm also interested in being on the PMC. Please add me to the list.

Neil Graham/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA wrote on 11/10/2004 03:04:36 PM:

<snip/>

> Originally, I'd hoped that the PMC could simply be composed of all 
active 
> committers.  Largely because these are so numerous, I no longer think 
> that's feasible; so I'm asking for folks to step forward and volunteer.
> 
> Through off-list discussions relating to how to get this train back on 
the 
> track, I've determined that both Gareth Reakes and Berin Lautenbach are 
> interested.  So am I.  Could all other interested parties add their 
names 
> to the following list by 00:00 GMT on Nov. 14?  I'll collate the list.
> 
> Proposed Xerces PMC:
> Neil Graham
> Berin Lautenbach
> Gareth Reakes

<snip/>

> Neil Graham
> Manager, XML Parser Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> Phone:  905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
> E-mail:  neilg@ca.ibm.com
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org

Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org

Re: Xerces top-level project: PMC composition and charter

Posted by Michael Glavassevich <mr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hello Neil,

I'm also interested in being on the PMC. Please add me to the list.

Neil Graham/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA wrote on 11/10/2004 03:04:36 PM:

<snip/>

> Originally, I'd hoped that the PMC could simply be composed of all 
active 
> committers.  Largely because these are so numerous, I no longer think 
> that's feasible; so I'm asking for folks to step forward and volunteer.
> 
> Through off-list discussions relating to how to get this train back on 
the 
> track, I've determined that both Gareth Reakes and Berin Lautenbach are 
> interested.  So am I.  Could all other interested parties add their 
names 
> to the following list by 00:00 GMT on Nov. 14?  I'll collate the list.
> 
> Proposed Xerces PMC:
> Neil Graham
> Berin Lautenbach
> Gareth Reakes

<snip/>

> Neil Graham
> Manager, XML Parser Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> Phone:  905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
> E-mail:  neilg@ca.ibm.com
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org

Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org