You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2005/12/07 04:10:20 UTC
SpamAssassin 3.0.5 RELEASED
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
(NOTE: this is a maintainance release of the 3.0.x branch. If you are
already running the more up-to-date, stable 3.1.0, pay no attention!
This is only for people who are stuck on 3.0.x for some reason.)
We got enough votes for those tarballs we voted on last week, so it's an
official release now. Here are the checksums:
md5sum of archive files:
0d6066561db3e4efff73f00c34584cb8 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.tar.bz2
12c9f14ffaeb5cb3b5801cc5b5231cdd Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.tar.gz
e0d0e556d5929bb209aedc91ccdb2358 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.zip
sha1sum of archive files:
30dcfce390a311dfff9430c1b00ae4f7e4357ca8 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.tar.bz2
99051775deb4566077fdca57a274531bade19bc8 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.tar.gz
7632e774d111764f041efb9e42453fc38885a1c2 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.zip
And they're available at http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/ .
Abbreviated changelog:
- - bug 4464: Trivial doco change
- - bug 4346: Skip large messages in sa-learn
- - bug 4570: Optimize a regexp that was blowing perl stack trying to parse
very long headers
- - Bug 4275: Fix some incorrectly case-insensitive URL parsing regexps
- - bug 3712: more efficient parsing of messages with lots of newlines in
header
- - bug 4065: Recognize new outlook express msgid format
- - bug 4390: Recognize URLs obfuscated using backslashes
- - bug 4439: Fix removal of markup when there are DOS newlines
- - bug 4565: new Yahoo server naming is causing FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD false
positives
- - bug 4522: URI parsing with JIS encoding
- - bug 4655: fix redhat init script for spamd to be smarter about stopping
processes
- - bug 4190: race condition in round-robin forking algorithm
- - bug 4535: parse mime content boundary with -- correctly
- - bug 3949: fix ALL_TRUSTED misfires
- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFDllKcMJF5cimLx9ARAicsAJ9scH3eWPq7rf3g2usGIPjZnf5cQQCglK8g
WdqjzNMaHzszmTI5xT8nHjk=
=aU+H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.5 RELEASED
Posted by Rob Skedgell <ro...@nephelococcygia.demon.co.uk>.
On Thursday 08 Dec 2005 18:30, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:42PM +0530, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
> > Someone forgot to update the spec file.
> >
> > [root@sauron ~]# rpmbuild -ta Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.tar.gz
> > error: File /root/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.gz: No such file or
> > directory
>
> Yeah, I unfortunately only noticed that after the release occurred.
> Sorry. To fix it, we'd have to release 3.0.6, and I don't know if
> anyone'd be interested in that simply for the spec file. :(
Would it be feasible to provide a .nosrc.rpm file for people to download
at the same time as the tarball, or would that be to much of a PITA
(not knowing how ASF organise files for download)?
--
Rob Skedgell <ro...@nephelococcygia.demon.co.uk>
Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.5 RELEASED
Posted by jdow <jd...@earthlink.net>.
From: "Warren Togami" <wt...@redhat.com>
> Dhawal Doshy wrote:
>> Theo Van Dinter writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:42PM +0530, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Someone forgot to update the spec file.
>>>> [root@sauron ~]# rpmbuild -ta Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.tar.gz
>>>> error: File /root/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.gz: No such file or
>>>> directory
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I unfortunately only noticed that after the release occurred.
>>> Sorry.
>>> To fix it, we'd have to release 3.0.6, and I don't know if anyone'd be
>>> interested in that simply for the spec file. :(
>>
>>
>> Shouldn't be a problem, i used rpm2cpio on 3.0.4.src.rpm to create the
>> 3.0.5 RHEL4 rpms. As long as packagers (eg: Warren) can take care of
>> this, most end users wouldn't notice. You might want to let others on
>> the sa-dev know about this.
>> - dhawal
>
> Real packagers almost never use the .spec file included in source
> tarballs, because we always need to make various customizations for our
> distributions.
Yeah, distros that leave out the tools. <grump> That's why I had to
rip your sa RPM out by its tonsils and install from CPAN.
{o.o} Joanne, Me gentle with a computer? Hah! I demand the computer
be gentle with ME. {^_-}
Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.5 RELEASED
Posted by Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com>.
Dhawal Doshy wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:42PM +0530, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
>>
>>> Someone forgot to update the spec file.
>>> [root@sauron ~]# rpmbuild -ta Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.tar.gz
>>> error: File /root/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.gz: No such file or
>>> directory
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I unfortunately only noticed that after the release occurred.
>> Sorry.
>> To fix it, we'd have to release 3.0.6, and I don't know if anyone'd be
>> interested in that simply for the spec file. :(
>
>
> Shouldn't be a problem, i used rpm2cpio on 3.0.4.src.rpm to create the
> 3.0.5 RHEL4 rpms. As long as packagers (eg: Warren) can take care of
> this, most end users wouldn't notice. You might want to let others on
> the sa-dev know about this.
> - dhawal
Real packagers almost never use the .spec file included in source
tarballs, because we always need to make various customizations for our
distributions.
Warren Togami
wtogami@redhat.com
Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.5 RELEASED
Posted by Dhawal Doshy <dh...@netmagicsolutions.com>.
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:42PM +0530, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
>> Someone forgot to update the spec file.
>>
>> [root@sauron ~]# rpmbuild -ta Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.tar.gz
>> error: File /root/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.gz: No such file or directory
>
> Yeah, I unfortunately only noticed that after the release occurred. Sorry.
> To fix it, we'd have to release 3.0.6, and I don't know if anyone'd be
> interested in that simply for the spec file. :(
Shouldn't be a problem, i used rpm2cpio on 3.0.4.src.rpm to create the 3.0.5
RHEL4 rpms. As long as packagers (eg: Warren) can take care of this, most
end users wouldn't notice. You might want to let others on the sa-dev know
about this.
- dhawal
Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.5 RELEASED
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 02:55:07PM -0800, jdow wrote:
> Release a 3.0.5_1 version or something like that.
Wouldn't help, the tar file has to be named appropriately for the spec file,
and we can't (and wouldn't want to) re-release the same named file. Since
we'd have to update the repo, Changes file, etc, it's enough for a 3.0.6 bump.
The question comes down to: is it worth doing for the small amount of change.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
All I ask is to prove that money can't make me happy.
Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.5 RELEASED
Posted by jdow <jd...@earthlink.net>.
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <fe...@apache.org>
Release a 3.0.5_1 version or something like that.
{^_-}
Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.5 RELEASED
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:42PM +0530, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
> Someone forgot to update the spec file.
>
> [root@sauron ~]# rpmbuild -ta Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.5.tar.gz
> error: File /root/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.gz: No such file or directory
Yeah, I unfortunately only noticed that after the release occurred. Sorry.
To fix it, we'd have to release 3.0.6, and I don't know if anyone'd be
interested in that simply for the spec file. :(
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Keyboard: Device for entering mistakes into a computer.