Which license to use for Xerces 2.5.0?

[Nauman Hameed <nh...@titledevelopments.com>]

Hi

I am using Xerces C++ Parser, Version 2.5.0 as part of my product. The license file included with the version 2.5.0 distribution contains Apache Software License, Version 1.1. However, I notice that the current license version is Apache Software License, Version 2.0. Should I distribute the Xerces C++ binaries with my software under license version 1.1 or 2.0?

Regards
Nauman

Re: Sax2 Parser -> startElement

[David Bertoni <db...@apache.org>]

Dennis Endt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> yesterday I tried to integrate the Sax2 Parser into my Project. I looked 
> at the original example on the Homepage and also derivated my class from 
> DefaultHandler.
> 
> Actually this works fine, I`m getting no errors.
> 
> But,and this is the problem, the Parser doesn`t walk into my overloaded 
> method "startElement".
> 
> I could show my Code, but it is just a 1:1 copy from the example code on 
> the Homepage.
> 
> What could be the failure?
The example code is out of date if you're working from the trunk.  You 
can verify this if you compare the signatures of 
DefaultHandler::startElement() and your derived member function.

What version of Xerces-C are you using?

Dave

Sax2 Parser -> startElement

[Dennis Endt <de...@googlemail.com>]

Hi,

yesterday I tried to integrate the Sax2 Parser into my Project. I looked 
at the original example on the Homepage and also derivated my class from 
DefaultHandler.

Actually this works fine, I`m getting no errors.

But,and this is the problem, the Parser doesn`t walk into my overloaded 
method "startElement".

I could show my Code, but it is just a 1:1 copy from the example code on 
the Homepage.

What could be the failure?

Greetings,
D.E.

Re: Which license to use for Xerces 2.5.0?

[Nauman Hameed <nh...@titledevelopments.com>]

Hi S

Thanks for the information.

Regards
Nauman

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sebastian 'CrashandDie' Lauwers" <cr...@gmail.com>
To: <c-...@xerces.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Which license to use for Xerces 2.5.0?


> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Nauman Hameed
> <nh...@titledevelopments.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am using Xerces C++ Parser, Version 2.5.0 as part of my product. The 
>> license file included with the version 2.5.0 distribution contains Apache 
>> Software License, Version 1.1. However, I notice that the current license 
>> version is Apache Software License, Version 2.0. Should I distribute the 
>> Xerces C++ binaries with my software under license version 1.1 or 2.0?
>
> No, at least, I don't think so.
>
> A given software version should always be distributed with the license
> it was distributed with in the first place. I (very) quickly went over
> the license, and saw nothing about version evolution, so I'd stick
> with the 1.1 one.
>
> Can anyone else confirm this ?
>
> S.
>
> -- 
> question = ( to ) ? be : ! be;
> -- Wm. Shakespeare
>
> 

Re: Which license to use for Xerces 2.5.0?

[Sebastian 'CrashandDie' Lauwers <cr...@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Nauman Hameed
<nh...@titledevelopments.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am using Xerces C++ Parser, Version 2.5.0 as part of my product. The license file included with the version 2.5.0 distribution contains Apache Software License, Version 1.1. However, I notice that the current license version is Apache Software License, Version 2.0. Should I distribute the Xerces C++ binaries with my software under license version 1.1 or 2.0?

No, at least, I don't think so.

A given software version should always be distributed with the license
it was distributed with in the first place. I (very) quickly went over
the license, and saw nothing about version evolution, so I'd stick
with the 1.1 one.

Can anyone else confirm this ?

S.

-- 
question = ( to ) ? be : ! be;
 -- Wm. Shakespeare