You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Vladimir Steshin (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/11/23 14:28:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-13705) Another node failes with failure of target node.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Vladimir Steshin updated IGNITE-13705:
--------------------------------------
    Summary: Another node failes with failure of target node.  (was: Fix another node failes with failure of target node.)

> Another node failes with failure of target node.
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-13705
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13705
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Vladimir Steshin
>            Assignee: Vladimir Steshin
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The discovery ducktape test [1] has detected failure of third node in the middle of 2 simulateously failed nodes.
> Scenario:
> Two nodes fail at the same time. The nodes have relative places in the ring: N-1 and N+1.
> Node N detects failure of node N+1. Node N tries to connect to node N+2. Node N+2 checks backward connection to node N+1.
> Problem: 
> Node N can fail too.
> Cause: 
> The timeout on node N to recover connection to node N+2 appears shorter than timeout on node N+2 to check connection to N+1.
> Fix:
> Introduced a fundamental timeout value to check/recover connection based on current configuration. Not a constant. Mentioned above timeouts have been made relative. The timeout of backward connection check is now generally shorter than the timeout to recover connection.
> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/ignite-ducktape/modules/ducktests/tests/ignitetest/tests/discovery_test.py



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)