You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ftpserver-users@mina.apache.org by frank buloup <fr...@univmed.fr> on 2011/03/24 09:14:25 UTC
Different scr and bin distrib
Hello,
Why are there different distributions, windows and *nix, for both source
and binary ?
Does it imply to have different developement projects if I want to
include ftpserver
lib in my project ?
thks
--
Frank Buloup
04 91 17 22 71
Institut des Sciences du Mouvement
UMR 6233 CNRS & Université de le Méditerranée
163 avenue de Luminy
13288 Marseille Cedex 9
Fax : 04 91 17 22 52
Re: Different scr and bin distrib
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:43 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it would be less confusing to find some other way of
> identifying the the different packaging, for example, replace
> Descriptiob with:
>
> Packaging
>
> Zip (Windows)
> Tar.gz (Unix/Linux/Cygwin)
I've thought about the same thing before. Fixed it now by removing the
reference to OSes completely.
/niklas
Re: Different scr and bin distrib
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 24 March 2011 10:52, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wrong ML ?
Hope not.
Is this not the developer list for ftpserver?
> On 3/24/11 11:43 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 24 March 2011 10:19, frank buloup<fr...@univmed.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry for this silly question :
>>> it seems that it is just convenient downloading ways
>>> Sorry
>>
>> I think he is correct to question the wording.
>>
>> There are some projects where the contents are different (e.g. Tomcat
>> has a DLL for Windows) but here it is just the packaging that is
>> different.
>>
>> I think it would be less confusing to find some other way of
>> identifying the the different packaging, for example, replace
>> Descriptiob with:
>>
>> Packaging
>>
>> Zip (Windows)
>> Tar.gz (Unix/Linux/Cygwin)
>>
>> Just a thought.
>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Why are there different distributions, windows and *nix, for both source
>>>> and binary ?
>>>> Does it imply to have different developement projects if I want to
>>>> include
>>>> ftpserver
>>>> lib in my project ?
>>>>
>>>> thks
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Frank Buloup
>>>
>>> 04 91 17 22 71
>>>
>>> Institut des Sciences du Mouvement
>>>
>>> UMR 6233 CNRS& Université de le Méditerranée
>>>
>>> 163 avenue de Luminy
>>>
>>> 13288 Marseille Cedex 9
>>>
>>> Fax : 04 91 17 22 52
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>
Re: Different scr and bin distrib
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Wrong ML ?
On 3/24/11 11:43 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 March 2011 10:19, frank buloup<fr...@univmed.fr> wrote:
>> Sorry for this silly question :
>> it seems that it is just convenient downloading ways
>> Sorry
> I think he is correct to question the wording.
>
> There are some projects where the contents are different (e.g. Tomcat
> has a DLL for Windows) but here it is just the packaging that is
> different.
>
> I think it would be less confusing to find some other way of
> identifying the the different packaging, for example, replace
> Descriptiob with:
>
> Packaging
>
> Zip (Windows)
> Tar.gz (Unix/Linux/Cygwin)
>
> Just a thought.
>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Why are there different distributions, windows and *nix, for both source
>>> and binary ?
>>> Does it imply to have different developement projects if I want to include
>>> ftpserver
>>> lib in my project ?
>>>
>>> thks
>>
>> --
>>
>> Frank Buloup
>>
>> 04 91 17 22 71
>>
>> Institut des Sciences du Mouvement
>>
>> UMR 6233 CNRS& Université de le Méditerranée
>>
>> 163 avenue de Luminy
>>
>> 13288 Marseille Cedex 9
>>
>> Fax : 04 91 17 22 52
>>
>>
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: Different scr and bin distrib
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 24 March 2011 10:19, frank buloup <fr...@univmed.fr> wrote:
> Sorry for this silly question :
> it seems that it is just convenient downloading ways
> Sorry
I think he is correct to question the wording.
There are some projects where the contents are different (e.g. Tomcat
has a DLL for Windows) but here it is just the packaging that is
different.
I think it would be less confusing to find some other way of
identifying the the different packaging, for example, replace
Descriptiob with:
Packaging
Zip (Windows)
Tar.gz (Unix/Linux/Cygwin)
Just a thought.
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Why are there different distributions, windows and *nix, for both source
>> and binary ?
>> Does it imply to have different developement projects if I want to include
>> ftpserver
>> lib in my project ?
>>
>> thks
>
>
> --
>
> Frank Buloup
>
> 04 91 17 22 71
>
> Institut des Sciences du Mouvement
>
> UMR 6233 CNRS & Université de le Méditerranée
>
> 163 avenue de Luminy
>
> 13288 Marseille Cedex 9
>
> Fax : 04 91 17 22 52
>
>
Re: Different scr and bin distrib
Posted by frank buloup <fr...@univmed.fr>.
Sorry for this silly question :
it seems that it is just convenient downloading ways
Sorry
> Hello,
>
> Why are there different distributions, windows and *nix, for both
> source and binary ?
> Does it imply to have different developement projects if I want to
> include ftpserver
> lib in my project ?
>
> thks
--
Frank Buloup
04 91 17 22 71
Institut des Sciences du Mouvement
UMR 6233 CNRS & Université de le Méditerranée
163 avenue de Luminy
13288 Marseille Cedex 9
Fax : 04 91 17 22 52