You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "Ashutosh Chauhan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/02/13 21:21:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-17627) Use druid scan query instead of the
select query.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16363062#comment-16363062 ]
Ashutosh Chauhan commented on HIVE-17627:
-----------------------------------------
[~bslim] You were reviewing this. Is this ready for commit or does this need more work?
> Use druid scan query instead of the select query.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-17627
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17627
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Druid integration
> Reporter: slim bouguerra
> Assignee: Nishant Bangarwa
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HIVE-17627.1.patch, HIVE-17627.2.patch, HIVE-17627.patch
>
>
> The biggest difference between select query and scan query is that, scan query doesn't retain all rows in memory before rows can be returned to client.
> It will cause memory pressure if too many rows required by select query.
> Scan query doesn't have this issue.
> Scan query can return all rows without issuing another pagination query, which is extremely useful when query against historical or realtime node directly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)