You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4cxx-user@logging.apache.org by B Moody <br...@hotmail.com> on 2006/04/19 18:26:33 UTC
Stability of SVN Head
brianmmoody...@hotmail.com
So if I'm looking to use log4cxx in a production system TODAY, what should I
use - 0.9.7 or the latest 0.9.8 code? It seems like neither one is useable
in a production environment. I built the latest from the SVN and it seems
to work fine, but how can I use a non-release version of a 3rd party library
in our production environment? The 0.9.7 release appears to be completely
unsupported. Any clarification on this would help. Thanks.
Brian
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stability-of-SVN-Head-t1475385.html#a3991152
Sent from the Log4cxx - Users forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Stability of SVN Head
Posted by B Moody <br...@agilent.com>.
Thanks for the tips - I appreciate it. After getting your feedback and after
playing with the functionality (it's pretty cool stuff!), I've gained enough
confidence in it that I'm going to cautiously move forward with using it.
Hopefully it goes well!
Brian
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stability-of-SVN-Head-t1475385.html#a3995583
Sent from the Log4cxx - Users forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Stability of SVN Head
Posted by Matthew Kanwisher <Ma...@kanwisher.com>.
Days(if it goes down its usually cause we change code every few days), I
haven't had any memory leak problems with the 0.9.8 but I have with the
other stuff. Btw as for what day to pull, usually with open source I grab
the latest so if you run into any probs patches are easily applied ;/
On 4/19/06, B Moody <br...@agilent.com> wrote:
>
>
> brianmmoody...@hotmail.com
>
> That's some pretty good useage. So how long does your server stay up
> about
> without being bounced?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Stability-of-SVN-Head-t1475385.html#a3992507
> Sent from the Log4cxx - Users forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
If video games influenced youth, all the kids who played Pac-Man would spend
all their time walking around in dark rooms listening to electronic music
and munching on magic pills.
Re: Stability of SVN Head
Posted by B Moody <br...@agilent.com>.
brianmmoody...@hotmail.com
That's some pretty good useage. So how long does your server stay up about
without being bounced?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stability-of-SVN-Head-t1475385.html#a3992507
Sent from the Log4cxx - Users forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Stability of SVN Head
Posted by Matthew Kanwisher <Ma...@kanwisher.com>.
So I generally log a few gigabytes a day, the system is totally dependant on
logging, been using it for 6 months now in production without any problems.
I guess its somewhere in the line of calling log4cxx hundreds of times per
minute. I use it for an interactive gaming server.
On 4/19/06, B Moody <br...@agilent.com> wrote:
>
>
> b moody
>
> What day did you get your svn head? How hard does your product hit the
> log4cxx library? If I could get a good known build, that might
> work. Does
> anyone have a feel for how many production systems are currently running
> the
> 0.9.8 library?
>
> Brian
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Stability-of-SVN-Head-t1475385.html#a3992129
> Sent from the Log4cxx - Users forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
If video games influenced youth, all the kids who played Pac-Man would spend
all their time walking around in dark rooms listening to electronic music
and munching on magic pills.
Re: Stability of SVN Head
Posted by B Moody <br...@agilent.com>.
b moody
What day did you get your svn head? How hard does your product hit the
log4cxx library? If I could get a good known build, that might work. Does
anyone have a feel for how many production systems are currently running the
0.9.8 library?
Brian
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stability-of-SVN-Head-t1475385.html#a3992129
Sent from the Log4cxx - Users forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Stability of SVN Head
Posted by Matthew Kanwisher <Ma...@kanwisher.com>.
I wouldn't use the tarballs of 0.9.7 on the website I found memory leaks and
its really not uptodate compared to log4j. Were using 0.9.8 svn head in
production and seems to be a really stable product.
On 4/19/06, B Moody <br...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> brianmmoody...@hotmail.com
>
> So if I'm looking to use log4cxx in a production system TODAY, what should
> I
> use - 0.9.7 or the latest 0.9.8 code? It seems like neither one is
> useable
> in a production environment. I built the latest from the SVN and it seems
> to work fine, but how can I use a non-release version of a 3rd party
> library
> in our production environment? The 0.9.7 release appears to be completely
> unsupported. Any clarification on this would help. Thanks.
>
> Brian
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Stability-of-SVN-Head-t1475385.html#a3991152
> Sent from the Log4cxx - Users forum at Nabble.com.
>
>