You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by qqqq <qq...@usermail.com> on 2006/05/08 23:37:55 UTC

My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

I probably get a FP about once a week as somebody will opt in a mailing list and a listed URL is in
the mailing.

When I get these complaints, I exempt the mailing list from the procmail rules so that the mailing
list doesn't get scanned by SA.

Just my 2 cents.

QQQQ


| > This isn't to say that URIBL_BLACK isn't useful, or that you
| > guys aren't doing a good job. However, this is good evidence
| > you guys are doing great, but you do still have some areas
| > that could use improvement.
| >
|
| thanks, i think. ;)
|
| our fp ratio for ham has always been hanging at that level.  i think thats a
| good sign.  it means the data in our zones that are causing those ham hits
| have not changed, and no one has notified us that they need removal.
| doesnt worry me a bit.
|
| we welcome your delist requests if you actually find a FP (that we can agree
| on) on black.uribl.com.  :)
|
| d
|
|