You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "Patrick Hunt (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/08/11 20:08:44 UTC

[jira] Created: (ZOOKEEPER-118) findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()

findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()
-------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-118
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118
             Project: Zookeeper
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: server
            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
            Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira


followerrequestprocessor:

is the case statement for SYNC supposed to fall through?
                switch (request.type) {
                case OpCode.sync:
                    zks.pendingSyncs.add(request);
                case OpCode.create:

Please update the docs/code appropriately (if correct note it with comment just after the sync case statement.


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-118) findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()

Posted by "Flavio Paiva Junqueira (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12629285#action_12629285 ] 

Flavio Paiva Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-118:
--------------------------------------------------

This piece of code seems correct. Sync should be processed along with other quorum operations such as create, but it does require some special code. In this case case, a follower saves the pending sync operations it has received from its clients before forwarding it to the leader. 

> findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-118
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
>
> followerrequestprocessor:
> is the case statement for SYNC supposed to fall through?
>                 switch (request.type) {
>                 case OpCode.sync:
>                     zks.pendingSyncs.add(request);
>                 case OpCode.create:
> Please update the docs/code appropriately (if correct note it with comment just after the sync case statement.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-118) findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()

Posted by "Patrick Hunt (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-118:
-----------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 3.0.0
     Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]
           Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

Committed revision 693529.

> findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-118
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-118.patch
>
>
> followerrequestprocessor:
> is the case statement for SYNC supposed to fall through?
>                 switch (request.type) {
>                 case OpCode.sync:
>                     zks.pendingSyncs.add(request);
>                 case OpCode.create:
> Please update the docs/code appropriately (if correct note it with comment just after the sync case statement.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-118) findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()

Posted by "Flavio Paiva Junqueira (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Flavio Paiva Junqueira updated ZOOKEEPER-118:
---------------------------------------------

    Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

The attached patch simply adds a comment to clarify the behavior of sync().

> findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-118
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-118.patch
>
>
> followerrequestprocessor:
> is the case statement for SYNC supposed to fall through?
>                 switch (request.type) {
>                 case OpCode.sync:
>                     zks.pendingSyncs.add(request);
>                 case OpCode.create:
> Please update the docs/code appropriately (if correct note it with comment just after the sync case statement.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-118) findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()

Posted by "Flavio Paiva Junqueira (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Flavio Paiva Junqueira updated ZOOKEEPER-118:
---------------------------------------------

    Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-118.patch

> findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-118
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-118.patch
>
>
> followerrequestprocessor:
> is the case statement for SYNC supposed to fall through?
>                 switch (request.type) {
>                 case OpCode.sync:
>                     zks.pendingSyncs.add(request);
>                 case OpCode.create:
> Please update the docs/code appropriately (if correct note it with comment just after the sync case statement.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-118) findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()

Posted by "Hudson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12629759#action_12629759 ] 

Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-118:
----------------------------------

Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #79 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/79/])

> findbugs flagged switch statement in followerrequestprocessor.run()
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-118
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-118
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-118.patch
>
>
> followerrequestprocessor:
> is the case statement for SYNC supposed to fall through?
>                 switch (request.type) {
>                 case OpCode.sync:
>                     zks.pendingSyncs.add(request);
>                 case OpCode.create:
> Please update the docs/code appropriately (if correct note it with comment just after the sync case statement.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.