You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Hugo Trippaers <hu...@trippaers.nl> on 2013/11/17 11:40:28 UTC
SDN compat matrix
Hey guys,
I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like to check it against your combined knowledge:
GRE isolation
supports L2 isolation
XenServer supported since pre ACS
KVM supported since pre ACS
(not taking son extensions branch into account yet)
VXLAN
supports L2 isolation
KVM supported since master (4.3)
Nicira NVP
supports L2 isolation
supports L3 NAT function since 4.1
supports VPC networks
XenServer supported since 4.0
KVM supported since 4.1
VMware supported since 4.2
Midokura
supports L2 isolation
supports L3 NAT, DHCP, Firewall
supports VPC networks
KVM supported since 4.2
Stratosphere
supports L2 isolation
KVM supported since 4.2
Contrail
supports L2 isolation
supports L3 NAT, DHCP
Xenserver supported since master
KVM supported since master
Anything i forgot here?
Cheers,
Hugo
Re: SDN compat matrix
Posted by Syed Ahmed <sy...@gmail.com>.
I just realised that this is infact by you. Sorry for the spam.
On Mon 18 Nov 2013 06:13:31 PM EST, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> I found
> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/CloudStack%20SDN%20-%20CloudOpen_0.pdf
> Which is also pretty recent ( a month old ) .
>
> You can probably reference this too.
>
> Thanks,
> -Syed
>
> On 11/18/2013 12:25 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback guys.
>>
>> I’ve put the updates matrix here on the wiki.
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Compatibility+Matrices
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Hugo
>>
>>
>> On 18 nov. 2013, at 08:01, Pedro Roque Marques
>> <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hugo,
>>> Small correction bellow...
>>>
>>> On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Hugo Trippaers <hu...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>
>>>> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in
>>>> my presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but
>>>> would like to check it against your combined knowledge:
>>>>
>>>> GRE isolation
>>>> supports L2 isolation
>>>> XenServer supported since pre ACS
>>>> KVM supported since pre ACS
>>>> (not taking son extensions branch into account yet)
>>>> VXLAN
>>>> supports L2 isolation
>>>> KVM supported since master (4.3)
>>>> Nicira NVP
>>>> supports L2 isolation
>>>> supports L3 NAT function since 4.1
>>>> supports VPC networks
>>>> XenServer supported since 4.0
>>>> KVM supported since 4.1
>>>> VMware supported since 4.2
>>>> Midokura
>>>> supports L2 isolation
>>>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP, Firewall
>>>> supports VPC networks
>>>> KVM supported since 4.2
>>>> Stratosphere
>>>> supports L2 isolation
>>>> KVM supported since 4.2
>>>> Contrail
>>>> supports L2 isolation
>>>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP
>>>> Xenserver supported since master
>>>> KVM supported since master
>>> For Contrail KVM support is not there yet...; it does support a
>>> distributed router replacing the domain router for traffic that
>>> traverses guest networks.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anything i forgot here?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Hugo
>
Re: SDN compat matrix
Posted by Syed Ahmed <sa...@cloudops.com>.
I found
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/CloudStack%20SDN%20-%20CloudOpen_0.pdf
Which is also pretty recent ( a month old ) .
You can probably reference this too.
Thanks,
-Syed
On 11/18/2013 12:25 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback guys.
>
> I’ve put the updates matrix here on the wiki. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Compatibility+Matrices
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
>
> On 18 nov. 2013, at 08:01, Pedro Roque Marques <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hugo,
>> Small correction bellow...
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Hugo Trippaers <hu...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like to check it against your combined knowledge:
>>>
>>> GRE isolation
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> XenServer supported since pre ACS
>>> KVM supported since pre ACS
>>> (not taking son extensions branch into account yet)
>>> VXLAN
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> KVM supported since master (4.3)
>>> Nicira NVP
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> supports L3 NAT function since 4.1
>>> supports VPC networks
>>> XenServer supported since 4.0
>>> KVM supported since 4.1
>>> VMware supported since 4.2
>>> Midokura
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP, Firewall
>>> supports VPC networks
>>> KVM supported since 4.2
>>> Stratosphere
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> KVM supported since 4.2
>>> Contrail
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP
>>> Xenserver supported since master
>>> KVM supported since master
>> For Contrail KVM support is not there yet...; it does support a distributed router replacing the domain router for traffic that traverses guest networks.
>>
>>>
>>> Anything i forgot here?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Hugo
Re: SDN compat matrix
Posted by Hugo Trippaers <hu...@trippaers.nl>.
Thanks for the feedback guys.
I’ve put the updates matrix here on the wiki. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Compatibility+Matrices
Cheers,
Hugo
On 18 nov. 2013, at 08:01, Pedro Roque Marques <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hugo,
> Small correction bellow...
>
> On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Hugo Trippaers <hu...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like to check it against your combined knowledge:
>>
>> GRE isolation
>> supports L2 isolation
>> XenServer supported since pre ACS
>> KVM supported since pre ACS
>> (not taking son extensions branch into account yet)
>> VXLAN
>> supports L2 isolation
>> KVM supported since master (4.3)
>> Nicira NVP
>> supports L2 isolation
>> supports L3 NAT function since 4.1
>> supports VPC networks
>> XenServer supported since 4.0
>> KVM supported since 4.1
>> VMware supported since 4.2
>> Midokura
>> supports L2 isolation
>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP, Firewall
>> supports VPC networks
>> KVM supported since 4.2
>> Stratosphere
>> supports L2 isolation
>> KVM supported since 4.2
>> Contrail
>> supports L2 isolation
>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP
>> Xenserver supported since master
>> KVM supported since master
>
> For Contrail KVM support is not there yet...; it does support a distributed router replacing the domain router for traffic that traverses guest networks.
>
>>
>>
>> Anything i forgot here?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Hugo
Re: SDN compat matrix
Posted by Pedro Roque Marques <pe...@gmail.com>.
Hugo,
Small correction bellow...
On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Hugo Trippaers <hu...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like to check it against your combined knowledge:
>
> GRE isolation
> supports L2 isolation
> XenServer supported since pre ACS
> KVM supported since pre ACS
> (not taking son extensions branch into account yet)
> VXLAN
> supports L2 isolation
> KVM supported since master (4.3)
> Nicira NVP
> supports L2 isolation
> supports L3 NAT function since 4.1
> supports VPC networks
> XenServer supported since 4.0
> KVM supported since 4.1
> VMware supported since 4.2
> Midokura
> supports L2 isolation
> supports L3 NAT, DHCP, Firewall
> supports VPC networks
> KVM supported since 4.2
> Stratosphere
> supports L2 isolation
> KVM supported since 4.2
> Contrail
> supports L2 isolation
> supports L3 NAT, DHCP
> Xenserver supported since master
> KVM supported since master
For Contrail KVM support is not there yet...; it does support a distributed router replacing the domain router for traffic that traverses guest networks.
>
>
> Anything i forgot here?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
Re: SDN compat matrix
Posted by Sebastien Goasguen <ru...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 17, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima <ma...@ynojima.net> wrote:
> VXLAN supports VPC networks. It also supports L3 NAT, DHCP and
> Firewall by utilizing CloudStack Virtual Router funtion for VLAN.
>
> -Noji
>
> 2013/11/17 Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>:
>> Also BigSwitch VNS 4.2
>>
>> --
>> Chiradeep
>>
>>> On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:40 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" <hu...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like to check it against your combined knowledge:
>>>
>>> GRE isolation
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> XenServer supported since pre ACS
>>> KVM supported since pre ACS
Is that right ? I don't think KVM was supported pre ACS in GRE controller. Thought we only added it with Nguyen's work.
>>> (not taking son extensions branch into account yet)
>>> VXLAN
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> KVM supported since master (4.3)
>>> Nicira NVP
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> supports L3 NAT function since 4.1
>>> supports VPC networks
>>> XenServer supported since 4.0
>>> KVM supported since 4.1
>>> VMware supported since 4.2
>>> Midokura
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP, Firewall
>>> supports VPC networks
>>> KVM supported since 4.2
>>> Stratosphere
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> KVM supported since 4.2
>>> Contrail
>>> supports L2 isolation
>>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP
>>> Xenserver supported since master
>>> KVM supported since master
>>>
>>>
>>> Anything i forgot here?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Hugo
Re: SDN compat matrix
Posted by Yoshikazu Nojima <ma...@ynojima.net>.
VXLAN supports VPC networks. It also supports L3 NAT, DHCP and
Firewall by utilizing CloudStack Virtual Router funtion for VLAN.
-Noji
2013/11/17 Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>:
> Also BigSwitch VNS 4.2
>
> --
> Chiradeep
>
>> On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:40 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" <hu...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like to check it against your combined knowledge:
>>
>> GRE isolation
>> supports L2 isolation
>> XenServer supported since pre ACS
>> KVM supported since pre ACS
>> (not taking son extensions branch into account yet)
>> VXLAN
>> supports L2 isolation
>> KVM supported since master (4.3)
>> Nicira NVP
>> supports L2 isolation
>> supports L3 NAT function since 4.1
>> supports VPC networks
>> XenServer supported since 4.0
>> KVM supported since 4.1
>> VMware supported since 4.2
>> Midokura
>> supports L2 isolation
>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP, Firewall
>> supports VPC networks
>> KVM supported since 4.2
>> Stratosphere
>> supports L2 isolation
>> KVM supported since 4.2
>> Contrail
>> supports L2 isolation
>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP
>> Xenserver supported since master
>> KVM supported since master
>>
>>
>> Anything i forgot here?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Hugo
Re: SDN compat matrix
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
Also BigSwitch VNS 4.2
--
Chiradeep
> On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:40 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" <hu...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like to check it against your combined knowledge:
>
> GRE isolation
> supports L2 isolation
> XenServer supported since pre ACS
> KVM supported since pre ACS
> (not taking son extensions branch into account yet)
> VXLAN
> supports L2 isolation
> KVM supported since master (4.3)
> Nicira NVP
> supports L2 isolation
> supports L3 NAT function since 4.1
> supports VPC networks
> XenServer supported since 4.0
> KVM supported since 4.1
> VMware supported since 4.2
> Midokura
> supports L2 isolation
> supports L3 NAT, DHCP, Firewall
> supports VPC networks
> KVM supported since 4.2
> Stratosphere
> supports L2 isolation
> KVM supported since 4.2
> Contrail
> supports L2 isolation
> supports L3 NAT, DHCP
> Xenserver supported since master
> KVM supported since master
>
>
> Anything i forgot here?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
Re: SDN compat matrix
Posted by David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>.
Bah autocorrect Bigswitch
On Nov 17, 2013 9:50 AM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> Big switch?
> On Nov 17, 2013 5:41 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" <hu...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my
>> presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like
>> to check it against your combined knowledge:
>>
>> GRE isolation
>> supports L2 isolation
>> XenServer supported since pre ACS
>> KVM supported since pre ACS
>> (not taking son extensions branch into account yet)
>> VXLAN
>> supports L2 isolation
>> KVM supported since master (4.3)
>> Nicira NVP
>> supports L2 isolation
>> supports L3 NAT function since 4.1
>> supports VPC networks
>> XenServer supported since 4.0
>> KVM supported since 4.1
>> VMware supported since 4.2
>> Midokura
>> supports L2 isolation
>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP, Firewall
>> supports VPC networks
>> KVM supported since 4.2
>> Stratosphere
>> supports L2 isolation
>> KVM supported since 4.2
>> Contrail
>> supports L2 isolation
>> supports L3 NAT, DHCP
>> Xenserver supported since master
>> KVM supported since master
>>
>>
>> Anything i forgot here?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Hugo
>
>
Re: SDN compat matrix
Posted by David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>.
Big switch?
On Nov 17, 2013 5:41 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" <hu...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my
> presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like
> to check it against your combined knowledge:
>
> GRE isolation
> supports L2 isolation
> XenServer supported since pre ACS
> KVM supported since pre ACS
> (not taking son extensions branch into account yet)
> VXLAN
> supports L2 isolation
> KVM supported since master (4.3)
> Nicira NVP
> supports L2 isolation
> supports L3 NAT function since 4.1
> supports VPC networks
> XenServer supported since 4.0
> KVM supported since 4.1
> VMware supported since 4.2
> Midokura
> supports L2 isolation
> supports L3 NAT, DHCP, Firewall
> supports VPC networks
> KVM supported since 4.2
> Stratosphere
> supports L2 isolation
> KVM supported since 4.2
> Contrail
> supports L2 isolation
> supports L3 NAT, DHCP
> Xenserver supported since master
> KVM supported since master
>
>
> Anything i forgot here?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo