You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> on 2003/07/23 16:09:06 UTC

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21827] - javah doesn't work with java j2sdk1.4.2

On 23 Jul 2003, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:

> Number 8

Does anybody else feel 1.5.4 getting closer?

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21827] - javah doesn't work with java j2sdk1.4.2

Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@iseran.com>.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:

> On 23 Jul 2003, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Number 8
> 
> 
> Does anybody else feel 1.5.4 getting closer?
> 

yup :(


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21827] - javah doesn't work with java j2sdk1.4.2

Posted by Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:44 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> Timeframe, hmm, I don't think we'll need a beta or an RC, do we?
>

No. I'll put together a mini-release plan for a vote and if agreed we can 
proceed directly to the release, I think.

Conor


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21827] - javah doesn't work with java j2sdk1.4.2

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>
wrote:

> Fair enough - although I'm not sure if both VAJ users are using Ant
> :-).

We may ask Christoph if he has started to use it again, that would
make one out of three.

> So, a 1.5.4 release for javah and VAJ fixes. Timeframe? 

I'll go ahead and merge the VAJ fixes over about Friday if nobody
objects.  I can do so for Javah as well, while I'm at it.

Timeframe, hmm, I don't think we'll need a beta or an RC, do we?

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21827] - javah doesn't work with java j2sdk1.4.2

Posted by Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:30 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>
>
> wrote:
> > Spending effort on merging other fixes will be somewhat of a waste.
>
> I agree with one exception - the VAJ changes.
>
> AFAIK VAJ mostly still runs on a VM of its own, a 1.1 compatible VM.
> So it might be worth to make the tasks available in the last release
> that supports 1.1.
>

Fair enough - although I'm not sure if both VAJ users are using Ant :-). 

So, a 1.5.4 release for javah and VAJ fixes. Timeframe? 

Conor


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21827] - javah doesn't work with java j2sdk1.4.2

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>
wrote:

> Spending effort on merging other fixes will be somewhat of a waste.

I agree with one exception - the VAJ changes.

AFAIK VAJ mostly still runs on a VM of its own, a 1.1 compatible VM.
So it might be worth to make the tasks available in the last release
that supports 1.1.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21827] - javah doesn't work with java j2sdk1.4.2

Posted by Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:09 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 23 Jul 2003, <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Number 8
>
> Does anybody else feel 1.5.4 getting closer?
>

Number 10 ? :-)

Seriously, if this is to go ahead, I think we should only fix this particular 
problem. Spending effort on merging other fixes will be somewhat of a waste.

Conor


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org