You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 1998/05/07 00:14:53 UTC

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src Configure

martin@hyperreal.org wrote:
> 
>   I was mislead into thinking that ReliantUNIX had semctl() problems, but
>   the reason was a wrong group id; the ReliantUNIX 5.44 fallback to
>   USE_FCNTL_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT was therefore unnecessary, I reverted to the
>   old default.

Would it be best to move the ReliantUNIX stuff into it's own
"slot" in conf.h? Seems like there are enough -D's to warrant
it.


-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src Configure

Posted by Martin Kraemer <Ma...@mch.sni.de>.

On Wed, May 06, 1998 at 06:14:53PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> Would it be best to move the ReliantUNIX stuff into it's own
> "slot" in conf.h? Seems like there are enough -D's to warrant
> it.

I'd rather like to know if there are other SVR4 systems which do NOT
like USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT. My guess is that they would accept
it as a default. I've tuned ReliantUNIX to use SYSV semaphores because
tests showed that USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT was faster than
USE_FCNTL_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT.

    Martin
-- 
| S I E M E N S |  <Ma...@mch.sni.de>  |      Siemens Nixdorf
| ------------- |   Voice: +49-89-636-46021     |  Informationssysteme AG
| N I X D O R F |   FAX:   +49-89-636-44994     |   81730 Munich, Germany
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~My opinions only, of course; pgp key available on request