You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> on 2006/01/17 01:30:49 UTC
Removing CGLIB enhancement from struts-action
I really don't like doing this. :( I'm happy to hear alternatives.
This is a proposal to remove CGLIB enhancement from Struts Action.
Bug# 37730 "Enhanced DynaActionForms cannot be correctly deserialized"
[0] remains unresolved and is holding up the 1.3.0 release plan. I'd
like to remove this in order to allow us to move forward with the
release.
The proposed patch is here:
http://people.apache.org/~wsmoak/struts-action/cglib/remove-cglib.diff
I left the 'enhanced' attribute in the DTD with the comment 'Reserved
for future use' so that if a solution is found it can still be part of
1.3.
Ted suggested moving this to the sandbox extras project but as it
involves changes to core classes I can't really "move" it like I did
with the commons-resources dependency. With Subversion, though,
nothing is ever really gone.
Thoughts?
[0] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37730
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Removing CGLIB enhancement from struts-action
Posted by David Durham <dd...@vailsys.com>.
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> [0] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37730
Heh, maybe a custom classloader for struts apps that is aware of
struts-config.
-Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Removing CGLIB enhancement from struts-action
Posted by Laurie Harper <la...@holoweb.net>.
I only saw Ted's message on this in my personal inbox, not here on the
list, so in case my reply to that doesn't get through to here:
+1 -- I unfortunately wont have time to address #37730 in the 1.3.0
timeframe :-( I'll revisit the feature when I have some spare cycles [I
get away with using this feature as-is because I don't put form beans in
session scope, but that's clearly not a reasonable restriction for the
release].
L.
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> I really don't like doing this. :( I'm happy to hear alternatives.
>
> This is a proposal to remove CGLIB enhancement from Struts Action.
> Bug# 37730 "Enhanced DynaActionForms cannot be correctly deserialized"
> [0] remains unresolved and is holding up the 1.3.0 release plan. I'd
> like to remove this in order to allow us to move forward with the
> release.
>
> The proposed patch is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~wsmoak/struts-action/cglib/remove-cglib.diff
>
> I left the 'enhanced' attribute in the DTD with the comment 'Reserved
> for future use' so that if a solution is found it can still be part of
> 1.3.
>
> Ted suggested moving this to the sandbox extras project but as it
> involves changes to core classes I can't really "move" it like I did
> with the commons-resources dependency. With Subversion, though,
> nothing is ever really gone.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> [0] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37730
>
> --
> Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org