You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Konrad Windszus (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/06/11 11:39:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (SLING-4027) Improvement of the validation API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14581729#comment-14581729 ]
Konrad Windszus commented on SLING-4027:
----------------------------------------
f) was solved in SLING-4777.
Since all the points mentioned here have been addressed in related issues I consider this fixed.
> Improvement of the validation API
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-4027
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4027
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Validation
> Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
> Assignee: Konrad Windszus
> Fix For: Validation 1.0.0
>
>
> Some comments / thoughts about the validation api:
> a) Why is there a validator lookup service? I don't think we need this in the API - it's a simple OSGI service lookup.
> b) A Validator can only validate a single value - what if a property is an array and the validation needs to validate based on all supplied values? Same goes with dependencies between two properties?
> c) The Validator interface returns null on success and a String (message) if validation fails. But it can also throw an exception if e.g. the provided value is null. I think a null value should be treated the same as a wrong value. Throwing the exception if some configuration like the regexp for the regexp validator is missing, is fine. but all errors of validating a value should be treated the same.
> d) NonExistingTypeException I don't think we need this - IllegalArgumentException is fine to throw from the type enumeration
> e) Maybe we can also remove the SlingValidationException - it is only thrown (see c) if a validator does not get its required configuration - which can be seen as an IllegalStateException
> f) It would be nice to have a ValidationModelProvider interface - we will then have the current way of defining models as the default implememtation. But can allow other means of defining the validation model
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)