You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Mark <ad...@asarian-host.net> on 2004/02/16 16:59:58 UTC

Will SA 2.70 contain SPF?

Well, the subject says it all: will SA 2.70 contain SPF?

Thanks,

- Mark

Re: Will SA 2.70 contain SPF?

Posted by Mark <ad...@asarian-host.net>.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim Stoop" <ti...@cidev.nl>
To: "Mark" <ad...@asarian-host.net>;
<sp...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: Will SA 2.70 contain SPF?


> Op maandag 16 februari 2004 16:59, schreef Mark:

> > Well, the subject says it all: will SA 2.70 contain SPF?
>
> What's SPF?

My mistake. :) SPF is "Sender Permitted From" (or "Sender Policy Framework",
as it is now called). See:

http://spf.pobox.com/

I believe it was said SA 2.70 would start supporting it. I, myself, am happy
enough doing SPF checks at Milter level; but there are those who like to
examine headers too (which could well be done in SA). So, just inquiring
about its status.

- Mark

Re: Will SA 2.70 contain SPF?

Posted by JRiley <jr...@spamfighter.org>.
> What's SPF?

Ultraviolet protection.

Re: Will SA 2.70 contain SPF?

Posted by Tim Stoop <ti...@cidev.nl>.
Op maandag 16 februari 2004 16:59, schreef Mark:
> Well, the subject says it all: will SA 2.70 contain SPF?

What's SPF?

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,
Tim Stoop
Complete Internet Development
http://www.cidev.nl

Random quote/fortune:
War spares not the brave, but the cowardly. -- Anacreon

Re: Will SA 2.70 contain SPF?

Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@kluge.net>.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:51:49AM +1100, David Hooton wrote:
> Are there any timelines available as far as release dates go?  Even fuzzy
> ones would be nice :)

Heh...  After March 1, before 2005?  ;)

I would guess that 3.0.0 will be out sometime in May...  It takes ~3 weeks
to do the general mass-check runs, and we're still monkeying around with
the code quite a bit, so ...  Assume a few weeks for getting the code
the way we like it, the time for the mass-check runs, and a few weeks
for testing ...

Could be earlier, could be later though ...  This is just rough estimation.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Sorry.  My testing organization is either too small, or too large, depending
 on how you look at it.  :-)
              -- Larry Wall in <19...@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov>

RE: Will SA 2.70 contain SPF?

Posted by David Hooton <dj...@platformhosting.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:mkettler@evi-inc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2004 3:16 AM
> To: Mark; spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Will SA 2.70 contain SPF?
> 
> At 10:59 AM 2/16/2004, Mark wrote:
> >Well, the subject says it all: will SA 2.70 contain SPF?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >- Mark
> 
> Yes, 2.70-cvs appears to already have SPF (Sender Policy Framework,
> formerly known as sender permitted from) included:
> 
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2634
> 

I know developers hate this question, but..

Are there any timelines available as far as release dates go?  Even fuzzy
ones would be nice :)

Cheers!

Dave


========================================================================
 Pain free spam & virus protection by:          www.mailsecurity.net.au
 Forward undetected SPAM to:                   spam@mailsecurity.net.au
========================================================================

Re: Will SA 2.70 contain SPF?

Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@evi-inc.com>.
At 10:59 AM 2/16/2004, Mark wrote:
>Well, the subject says it all: will SA 2.70 contain SPF?
>
>Thanks,
>
>- Mark

Yes, 2.70-cvs appears to already have SPF (Sender Policy Framework, 
formerly known as sender permitted from) included:

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2634