You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ratis.apache.org by "Elek, Marton" <el...@apache.org> on 2019/02/06 10:21:42 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Bumping up this thread.
I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
Thanks,
Marton
On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start
> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
>
> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can
> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <ji...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> +1
> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 as well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk.
>
> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Marton,
>
> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move everything in
> trunk to 0.3?
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any comment on this?
> >
> > What is the plan with the next release?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marton
> >
> > On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > > Bumping up this thread.
> > >
> > > I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
> > >
> > > As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> > >
> > > What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> > >
> > > Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> > >
> > > Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Marton
> > >
> > > On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start
> > >> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> > >>
> > >> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can
> > >> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> > >>
> > >> Tsz-Wo
> > >>
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
I am going to prepare a release candidate from branch-0.3. Thanks everyone!
Tsz-Wo
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:23 PM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rajeshbabu,
>
> Thanks a lot for the quick response!
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:06 PM rajeshbabu@apache.org
> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > committed RATIS-510 to branch 0.3.0 Tsz.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rajeshbabu.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:28 PM rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I will commit RATIS-510 Tez.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rajeshbabu.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 3:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze <szetszwo@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > >> All RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490 are now committed. However, we
> > >> need RATIS-510 (missing Apache license header) or revert RATIS-475
> > >> from branch-0.3.
> > >>
> > >> Will see if we can roll a release tomorrow.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >> Tsz-Wo
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:09 AM Jitendra Pandey <jn...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > +1 I would suggest we should cut a release candidate once following 3
> > >> are
> > >> > included:
> > >> > RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490, however RATIS-490 is not a blocker
> > >> in
> > >> > my opinion.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:47 AM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3? Please let me know
> > >> > > if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0. Thanks.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Tsz-Wo
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I just have re-created branch-0.3. If you already have branch-0.3
> > >> > > > locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes.
> > >> Thanks.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Tsz-Wo
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
> > >> > > > <ms...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > +1,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <jn...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or
> > >> re-create
> > >> > > the 0.3
> > >> > > > > branch).
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > +1
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal
> > >> > > <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <
> > >> szetszwo@gmail.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in
> > >> master to
> > >> > > > > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow.
> > >> Thanks.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Tsz-Wo
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <
> > >> > > jitendra@hortonworks.com>
> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> +1
> > >> > > > > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to
> > >> be in
> > >> > > 0.3 as
> > >> > > > > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current
> > >> > > trunk.
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> Hi Marton,
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move
> > >> > > everything in
> > >> > > > > > >> trunk to 0.3?
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> Tsz-Wo
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <
> > >> > > elek@apache.org>
> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> Hi,
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> Any comment on this?
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > >>> Marton
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next
> > >> ozone
> > >> > > release.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest
> > >> master?
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > >>>> Marton
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> Hi,
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How
> > >> about
> > >> > > we start
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to
> > >> 0.4.0.
> > >> > > Then, we can
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
Rajeshbabu,
Thanks a lot for the quick response!
Tsz-Wo
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:06 PM rajeshbabu@apache.org
<ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> committed RATIS-510 to branch 0.3.0 Tsz.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajeshbabu.
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:28 PM rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I will commit RATIS-510 Tez.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rajeshbabu.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 3:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze <szetszwo@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> All RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490 are now committed. However, we
> >> need RATIS-510 (missing Apache license header) or revert RATIS-475
> >> from branch-0.3.
> >>
> >> Will see if we can roll a release tomorrow.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> Tsz-Wo
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:09 AM Jitendra Pandey <jn...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > +1 I would suggest we should cut a release candidate once following 3
> >> are
> >> > included:
> >> > RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490, however RATIS-490 is not a blocker
> >> in
> >> > my opinion.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:47 AM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3? Please let me know
> >> > > if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0. Thanks.
> >> > >
> >> > > Tsz-Wo
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I just have re-created branch-0.3. If you already have branch-0.3
> >> > > > locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes.
> >> Thanks.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Tsz-Wo
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
> >> > > > <ms...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > +1,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <jn...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or
> >> re-create
> >> > > the 0.3
> >> > > > > branch).
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > +1
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal
> >> > > <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <
> >> szetszwo@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in
> >> master to
> >> > > > > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow.
> >> Thanks.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Tsz-Wo
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <
> >> > > jitendra@hortonworks.com>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> +1
> >> > > > > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to
> >> be in
> >> > > 0.3 as
> >> > > > > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current
> >> > > trunk.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Hi Marton,
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move
> >> > > everything in
> >> > > > > > >> trunk to 0.3?
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Tsz-Wo
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <
> >> > > elek@apache.org>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> Hi,
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> Any comment on this?
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> Thanks,
> >> > > > > > >>> Marton
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next
> >> ozone
> >> > > release.
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest
> >> master?
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> >> > > > > > >>>> Marton
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>> Hi,
> >> > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How
> >> about
> >> > > we start
> >> > > > > > >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> >> > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to
> >> 0.4.0.
> >> > > Then, we can
> >> > > > > > >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> >> > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by "rajeshbabu@apache.org" <ch...@gmail.com>.
committed RATIS-510 to branch 0.3.0 Tsz.
Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:28 PM rajeshbabu@apache.org <
chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will commit RATIS-510 Tez.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajeshbabu.
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 3:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze <szetszwo@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> All RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490 are now committed. However, we
>> need RATIS-510 (missing Apache license header) or revert RATIS-475
>> from branch-0.3.
>>
>> Will see if we can roll a release tomorrow.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Tsz-Wo
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:09 AM Jitendra Pandey <jn...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 I would suggest we should cut a release candidate once following 3
>> are
>> > included:
>> > RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490, however RATIS-490 is not a blocker
>> in
>> > my opinion.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:47 AM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3? Please let me know
>> > > if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0. Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > Tsz-Wo
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > I just have re-created branch-0.3. If you already have branch-0.3
>> > > > locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes.
>> Thanks.
>> > > >
>> > > > Tsz-Wo
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
>> > > > <ms...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > +1,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <jn...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or
>> re-create
>> > > the 0.3
>> > > > > branch).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > +1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal
>> > > <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <
>> szetszwo@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in
>> master to
>> > > > > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow.
>> Thanks.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Tsz-Wo
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <
>> > > jitendra@hortonworks.com>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> +1
>> > > > > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to
>> be in
>> > > 0.3 as
>> > > > > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current
>> > > trunk.
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Hi Marton,
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move
>> > > everything in
>> > > > > > >> trunk to 0.3?
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Tsz-Wo
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <
>> > > elek@apache.org>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> Hi,
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> Any comment on this?
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > >>> Marton
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>> Bumping up this thread.
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next
>> ozone
>> > > release.
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest
>> master?
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > >>>> Marton
>> > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
>> > > > > > >>>>> Hi,
>> > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How
>> about
>> > > we start
>> > > > > > >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
>> > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to
>> 0.4.0.
>> > > Then, we can
>> > > > > > >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
>> > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>>>> Tsz-Wo
>> > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by "rajeshbabu@apache.org" <ch...@gmail.com>.
I will commit RATIS-510 Tez.
Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 3:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze <szetszwo@gmail.com wrote:
> All RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490 are now committed. However, we
> need RATIS-510 (missing Apache license header) or revert RATIS-475
> from branch-0.3.
>
> Will see if we can roll a release tomorrow.
>
> Thanks.
> Tsz-Wo
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:09 AM Jitendra Pandey <jn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 I would suggest we should cut a release candidate once following 3 are
> > included:
> > RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490, however RATIS-490 is not a blocker in
> > my opinion.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:47 AM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3? Please let me know
> > > if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Tsz-Wo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I just have re-created branch-0.3. If you already have branch-0.3
> > > > locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes.
> Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Tsz-Wo
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
> > > > <ms...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <jn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create
> > > the 0.3
> > > > > branch).
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal
> > > <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <
> szetszwo@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in
> master to
> > > > > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tsz-Wo
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <
> > > jitendra@hortonworks.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> +1
> > > > > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to
> be in
> > > 0.3 as
> > > > > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current
> > > trunk.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Hi Marton,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move
> > > everything in
> > > > > > >> trunk to 0.3?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Tsz-Wo
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <
> > > elek@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Any comment on this?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>> Marton
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > > > > > >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next
> ozone
> > > release.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest
> master?
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>> Marton
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>> Hi,
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How
> about
> > > we start
> > > > > > >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0.
> > > Then, we can
> > > > > > >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
All RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490 are now committed. However, we
need RATIS-510 (missing Apache license header) or revert RATIS-475
from branch-0.3.
Will see if we can roll a release tomorrow.
Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:09 AM Jitendra Pandey <jn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 I would suggest we should cut a release candidate once following 3 are
> included:
> RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490, however RATIS-490 is not a blocker in
> my opinion.
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:47 AM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3? Please let me know
> > if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0. Thanks.
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I just have re-created branch-0.3. If you already have branch-0.3
> > > locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Tsz-Wo
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
> > > <ms...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1,
> > > >
> > > > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <jn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create
> > the 0.3
> > > > branch).
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal
> > <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> > > > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tsz-Wo
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <
> > jitendra@hortonworks.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> +1
> > > > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in
> > 0.3 as
> > > > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current
> > trunk.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hi Marton,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move
> > everything in
> > > > > >> trunk to 0.3?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Tsz-Wo
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <
> > elek@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Any comment on this?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>> Marton
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > > > > >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone
> > release.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>> Marton
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> Hi,
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about
> > we start
> > > > > >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0.
> > Then, we can
> > > > > >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Jitendra Pandey <jn...@gmail.com>.
+1 I would suggest we should cut a release candidate once following 3 are
included:
RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490, however RATIS-490 is not a blocker in
my opinion.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:47 AM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3? Please let me know
> if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0. Thanks.
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I just have re-created branch-0.3. If you already have branch-0.3
> > locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes. Thanks.
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
> > <ms...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1,
> > >
> > > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <jn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create
> the 0.3
> > > branch).
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal
> <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> > > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tsz-Wo
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <
> jitendra@hortonworks.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +1
> > > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in
> 0.3 as
> > > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current
> trunk.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi Marton,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move
> everything in
> > > > >> trunk to 0.3?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Tsz-Wo
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <
> elek@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Any comment on this?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > >>> Marton
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > > > >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone
> release.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>> Marton
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > > > >>>>> Hi,
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about
> we start
> > > > >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0.
> Then, we can
> > > > >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3? Please let me know
if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0. Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I just have re-created branch-0.3. If you already have branch-0.3
> locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes. Thanks.
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
> <ms...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1,
> >
> > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <jn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3
> > branch).
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Tsz-Wo
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <ji...@hortonworks.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> +1
> > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 as
> > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk.
> > > >>
> > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Marton,
> > > >>
> > > >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move everything in
> > > >> trunk to 0.3?
> > > >>
> > > >> Tsz-Wo
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Any comment on this?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Marton
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > > >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>> Marton
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > > >>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start
> > > >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can
> > > >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
I just have re-created branch-0.3. If you already have branch-0.3
locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes. Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
<ms...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> +1,
>
> On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <jn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3
> branch).
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> >
> >
> > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Tsz-Wo
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <ji...@hortonworks.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 as
> > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk.
> > >>
> > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Marton,
> > >>
> > >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move everything in
> > >> trunk to 0.3?
> > >>
> > >> Tsz-Wo
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> Any comment on this?
> > >>>
> > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Marton
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Marton
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start
> > >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can
> > >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> > >>>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Mukul Kumar Singh <ms...@hortonworks.com>.
+1,
On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <jn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3
branch).
+1
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
>
>
> > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks.
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <ji...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 as
> well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk.
> >>
> >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Marton,
> >>
> >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move everything in
> >> trunk to 0.3?
> >>
> >> Tsz-Wo
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Any comment on this?
> >>>
> >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Marton
> >>>
> >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
> >>>>
> >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> >>>>
> >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Marton
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start
> >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can
> >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Jitendra Pandey <jn...@gmail.com>.
> I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3
branch).
+1
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
>
>
> > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks.
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <ji...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 as
> well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk.
> >>
> >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Marton,
> >>
> >> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move everything in
> >> trunk to 0.3?
> >>
> >> Tsz-Wo
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Any comment on this?
> >>>
> >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Marton
> >>>
> >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
> >>>>
> >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> >>>>
> >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Marton
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start
> >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can
> >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Arpit Agarwal <aa...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks.
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <ji...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 as well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk.
>>
>> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marton,
>>
>> For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move everything in
>> trunk to 0.3?
>>
>> Tsz-Wo
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Any comment on this?
>>>
>>> What is the plan with the next release?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Marton
>>>
>>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
>>>> Bumping up this thread.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
>>>>
>>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
>>>>
>>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
>>>>
>>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
>>>>
>>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Marton
>>>>
>>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start
>>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
>>>>>
>>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can
>>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tsz-Wo
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Jitendra Pandey <ji...@hortonworks.com>.
+1
There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 as well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk.
On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Marton,
For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move everything in
trunk to 0.3?
Tsz-Wo
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any comment on this?
>
> What is the plan with the next release?
>
> Thanks,
> Marton
>
> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > Bumping up this thread.
> >
> > I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
> >
> > As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> >
> > What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> >
> > Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> >
> > Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marton
> >
> > On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start
> >> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> >>
> >> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can
> >> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> >>
> >> Tsz-Wo
> >>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
Hi Marton,
For Ozone, it probably needs trunk. How about we move everything in
trunk to 0.3?
Tsz-Wo
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any comment on this?
>
> What is the plan with the next release?
>
> Thanks,
> Marton
>
> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > Bumping up this thread.
> >
> > I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
> >
> > As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> >
> > What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> >
> > Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> >
> > Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marton
> >
> > On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start
> >> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> >>
> >> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can
> >> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> >>
> >> Tsz-Wo
> >>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release
Posted by "Elek, Marton" <el...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Any comment on this?
What is the plan with the next release?
Thanks,
Marton
On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> Bumping up this thread.
>
> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
>
> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
>
> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
>
> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
>
> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Marton
>
> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release. How about we start
>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
>>
>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0. Then, we can
>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
>>
>> Tsz-Wo
>>