You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com> on 2015/09/15 21:54:57 UTC
[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.1-incubating Release
The vote for releasing Apache TinkerPop passed with 3 binding +1s, 0
non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1.
Binding +1s:
Daniel Gruno
Justin Mclean
Rich Bowen
Thanks to those who gave us a hand and added a vote.
Separately, Justin, I'll try to get LICENSE/NOTICE right for the next run.
I suspect I'll be pinging this list separately for a bit more guidance
before then. Thanks.
Stephen
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I suppose I still could have missed something, but I thought i'd gotten
> the bulk of it right - could you please
> > tell me what you noticed that I missed or misunderstood from your last
> > post?
>
> Only things in the release need to be in LICENSE or NOTICE [1]. I’d check
> that first. Permissive licensed software (i.e. MIT/BSD) don't need to go in
> NOTICE [5], I can see there a few of those there.
>
> > Does that simply mean that I should remove all apache licensed
> dependencies
> > from the binary NOTICE and all is good?
>
> Generally when adding Apache licenced software there's no need to modify
> LICENSE or NOTICE unless it has a NOTICE file [2]. That means you generally
> don’t have to add much when bundling other ASF projects especially when
> they have a boilerplate NOTICE file. [3] The no need to add Apache licensed
> software to LICENSE but it not an licensing error to do so. I generally
> don’t mind that as it makes checking releases a little easier when
> reviewing.
>
> Not that dependancies of dependancies matter [4]. Rather than go down that
> rabbit hole just look inside all the jars in the release with something
> like this:
> find . -name "*.jar" -exec tar ft {} \; | sort -u > paths.txt
>
> Look at all of the classes contained to see what’s included. For example
> with TinkerPop I see that it includes "com/carrotsearch/hppc” and looking
> at its license (Apache) I can see it has a NOTICE file (which looks
> incorrect but that’s another story), so that would need to be considered
> and possibly something added to TinkerPop’s NOTICE. In this case I’d
> probably assume a standard NOTICE and add a copyright line to the NOTICE
> file - but that’s not the only valid solution. It's may not be always clear
> cut what needs to be done and you may have to consider each on a case by
> case basis.
>
> If any questions come up ask you mentors, ask this list or on legal
> discuss.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
> 2.. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
> 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product
> 4. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-deps
> 5. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.1-incubating Release
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Apologies, I looked at the last email not the first
On Sep 15, 2015 17:31, "Stephen Mallette" <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi John, the vote has been open since September 8th - here's where it
> started:
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201509.mbox/%3CCAA-H438vLKoQiJ%3Dcn6CXPYOvueHrvzbBQ_LhKgmxjVkeMceAMQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:13 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Ideally we leave votes open for 72 hrs in case anyone has a -1 after 3
> +1s
> > cast.
> > On Sep 15, 2015 15:55, "Stephen Mallette" <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The vote for releasing Apache TinkerPop passed with 3 binding +1s, 0
> > > non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1.
> > >
> > > Binding +1s:
> > > Daniel Gruno
> > > Justin Mclean
> > > Rich Bowen
> > >
> > > Thanks to those who gave us a hand and added a vote.
> > >
> > > Separately, Justin, I'll try to get LICENSE/NOTICE right for the next
> > run.
> > > I suspect I'll be pinging this list separately for a bit more guidance
> > > before then. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Stephen
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Justin Mclean <
> justin@classsoftware.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > > I suppose I still could have missed something, but I thought i'd
> > gotten
> > > > the bulk of it right - could you please
> > > > > tell me what you noticed that I missed or misunderstood from your
> > last
> > > > > post?
> > > >
> > > > Only things in the release need to be in LICENSE or NOTICE [1]. I’d
> > check
> > > > that first. Permissive licensed software (i.e. MIT/BSD) don't need to
> > go
> > > in
> > > > NOTICE [5], I can see there a few of those there.
> > > >
> > > > > Does that simply mean that I should remove all apache licensed
> > > > dependencies
> > > > > from the binary NOTICE and all is good?
> > > >
> > > > Generally when adding Apache licenced software there's no need to
> > modify
> > > > LICENSE or NOTICE unless it has a NOTICE file [2]. That means you
> > > generally
> > > > don’t have to add much when bundling other ASF projects especially
> when
> > > > they have a boilerplate NOTICE file. [3] The no need to add Apache
> > > licensed
> > > > software to LICENSE but it not an licensing error to do so. I
> generally
> > > > don’t mind that as it makes checking releases a little easier when
> > > > reviewing.
> > > >
> > > > Not that dependancies of dependancies matter [4]. Rather than go down
> > > that
> > > > rabbit hole just look inside all the jars in the release with
> something
> > > > like this:
> > > > find . -name "*.jar" -exec tar ft {} \; | sort -u > paths.txt
> > > >
> > > > Look at all of the classes contained to see what’s included. For
> > example
> > > > with TinkerPop I see that it includes "com/carrotsearch/hppc” and
> > looking
> > > > at its license (Apache) I can see it has a NOTICE file (which looks
> > > > incorrect but that’s another story), so that would need to be
> > considered
> > > > and possibly something added to TinkerPop’s NOTICE. In this case I’d
> > > > probably assume a standard NOTICE and add a copyright line to the
> > NOTICE
> > > > file - but that’s not the only valid solution. It's may not be always
> > > clear
> > > > cut what needs to be done and you may have to consider each on a case
> > by
> > > > case basis.
> > > >
> > > > If any questions come up ask you mentors, ask this list or on legal
> > > > discuss.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Justin
> > > >
> > > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
> > > > 2.. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
> > > > 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product
> > > > 4. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-deps
> > > > 5. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.1-incubating Release
Posted by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>.
Hi John, the vote has been open since September 8th - here's where it
started:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201509.mbox/%3CCAA-H438vLKoQiJ%3Dcn6CXPYOvueHrvzbBQ_LhKgmxjVkeMceAMQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:13 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Ideally we leave votes open for 72 hrs in case anyone has a -1 after 3 +1s
> cast.
> On Sep 15, 2015 15:55, "Stephen Mallette" <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The vote for releasing Apache TinkerPop passed with 3 binding +1s, 0
> > non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1.
> >
> > Binding +1s:
> > Daniel Gruno
> > Justin Mclean
> > Rich Bowen
> >
> > Thanks to those who gave us a hand and added a vote.
> >
> > Separately, Justin, I'll try to get LICENSE/NOTICE right for the next
> run.
> > I suspect I'll be pinging this list separately for a bit more guidance
> > before then. Thanks.
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > I suppose I still could have missed something, but I thought i'd
> gotten
> > > the bulk of it right - could you please
> > > > tell me what you noticed that I missed or misunderstood from your
> last
> > > > post?
> > >
> > > Only things in the release need to be in LICENSE or NOTICE [1]. I’d
> check
> > > that first. Permissive licensed software (i.e. MIT/BSD) don't need to
> go
> > in
> > > NOTICE [5], I can see there a few of those there.
> > >
> > > > Does that simply mean that I should remove all apache licensed
> > > dependencies
> > > > from the binary NOTICE and all is good?
> > >
> > > Generally when adding Apache licenced software there's no need to
> modify
> > > LICENSE or NOTICE unless it has a NOTICE file [2]. That means you
> > generally
> > > don’t have to add much when bundling other ASF projects especially when
> > > they have a boilerplate NOTICE file. [3] The no need to add Apache
> > licensed
> > > software to LICENSE but it not an licensing error to do so. I generally
> > > don’t mind that as it makes checking releases a little easier when
> > > reviewing.
> > >
> > > Not that dependancies of dependancies matter [4]. Rather than go down
> > that
> > > rabbit hole just look inside all the jars in the release with something
> > > like this:
> > > find . -name "*.jar" -exec tar ft {} \; | sort -u > paths.txt
> > >
> > > Look at all of the classes contained to see what’s included. For
> example
> > > with TinkerPop I see that it includes "com/carrotsearch/hppc” and
> looking
> > > at its license (Apache) I can see it has a NOTICE file (which looks
> > > incorrect but that’s another story), so that would need to be
> considered
> > > and possibly something added to TinkerPop’s NOTICE. In this case I’d
> > > probably assume a standard NOTICE and add a copyright line to the
> NOTICE
> > > file - but that’s not the only valid solution. It's may not be always
> > clear
> > > cut what needs to be done and you may have to consider each on a case
> by
> > > case basis.
> > >
> > > If any questions come up ask you mentors, ask this list or on legal
> > > discuss.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
> > > 2.. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
> > > 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product
> > > 4. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-deps
> > > 5. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.1-incubating Release
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Ideally we leave votes open for 72 hrs in case anyone has a -1 after 3 +1s
cast.
On Sep 15, 2015 15:55, "Stephen Mallette" <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The vote for releasing Apache TinkerPop passed with 3 binding +1s, 0
> non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1.
>
> Binding +1s:
> Daniel Gruno
> Justin Mclean
> Rich Bowen
>
> Thanks to those who gave us a hand and added a vote.
>
> Separately, Justin, I'll try to get LICENSE/NOTICE right for the next run.
> I suspect I'll be pinging this list separately for a bit more guidance
> before then. Thanks.
>
> Stephen
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I suppose I still could have missed something, but I thought i'd gotten
> > the bulk of it right - could you please
> > > tell me what you noticed that I missed or misunderstood from your last
> > > post?
> >
> > Only things in the release need to be in LICENSE or NOTICE [1]. I’d check
> > that first. Permissive licensed software (i.e. MIT/BSD) don't need to go
> in
> > NOTICE [5], I can see there a few of those there.
> >
> > > Does that simply mean that I should remove all apache licensed
> > dependencies
> > > from the binary NOTICE and all is good?
> >
> > Generally when adding Apache licenced software there's no need to modify
> > LICENSE or NOTICE unless it has a NOTICE file [2]. That means you
> generally
> > don’t have to add much when bundling other ASF projects especially when
> > they have a boilerplate NOTICE file. [3] The no need to add Apache
> licensed
> > software to LICENSE but it not an licensing error to do so. I generally
> > don’t mind that as it makes checking releases a little easier when
> > reviewing.
> >
> > Not that dependancies of dependancies matter [4]. Rather than go down
> that
> > rabbit hole just look inside all the jars in the release with something
> > like this:
> > find . -name "*.jar" -exec tar ft {} \; | sort -u > paths.txt
> >
> > Look at all of the classes contained to see what’s included. For example
> > with TinkerPop I see that it includes "com/carrotsearch/hppc” and looking
> > at its license (Apache) I can see it has a NOTICE file (which looks
> > incorrect but that’s another story), so that would need to be considered
> > and possibly something added to TinkerPop’s NOTICE. In this case I’d
> > probably assume a standard NOTICE and add a copyright line to the NOTICE
> > file - but that’s not the only valid solution. It's may not be always
> clear
> > cut what needs to be done and you may have to consider each on a case by
> > case basis.
> >
> > If any questions come up ask you mentors, ask this list or on legal
> > discuss.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
> > 2.. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
> > 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product
> > 4. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-deps
> > 5. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>