You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@iotdb.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/09/13 08:29:37 UTC

[GitHub] [iotdb] neuyilan edited a comment on pull request #3939: init dummyIndex after restart cluster

neuyilan edited a comment on pull request #3939:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/3939#issuecomment-917961701


   > Another my suggestion is we can gradually separate raft implementation and raft client(application) just like what `etcd` did. The goal of this is, finally, we can involve `Ratis` to help manage the Raft status. Maybe it's time to put `Ratis` on the agenda. I strongly suggest someone spend some time to investigate `Ratis` and evaluate the cost of integration. Instead of Raft correctness, We could focus on improving the core engine of IoTDB and ecosystem after that.
   
   Actually, I have the same idea as you, I think we can integrate `Apache Ratis` with our project,  so at least we can guarantee the correctness of the raft, and our energy can be used for some functions of `IoTDB`.  And at present, I think the correctness is far greater than the performance.
   But it's really a time-consuming thing. We need to work together to finish it.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@iotdb.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org