You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/06/21 23:52:41 UTC

[GitHub] [solr] patsonluk commented on a diff in pull request #909: SOLR-16257: `ZkStateReader` changes to avoid race condition between `collectionWatches` and `watchedCollectionStates`

patsonluk commented on code in PR #909:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/909#discussion_r903157548


##########
solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/cloud/ZkStateReader.java:
##########
@@ -246,6 +244,90 @@ public boolean canBeRemoved() {
     }
   }
 
+  /**
+   * A ConcurrentHashMap of active watcher by collection name
+   *
+   * <p>Each watcher DocCollectionWatch also contains the latest DocCollection (state) observed
+   */
+  private static class DocCollectionWatches
+      extends ConcurrentHashMap<String, DocCollectionWatch<DocCollectionWatcher>> {
+
+    /**
+     * Gets the DocCollection (state) of the collection which the corresponding watch last observed
+     *
+     * @param collection the collection name to get DocCollection on
+     * @return The last observed DocCollection(state). if null, that means there's no such
+     *     collection.
+     */
+    private DocCollection getDocCollection(String collection) {
+      DocCollectionWatch<DocCollectionWatcher> watch = get(collection);
+      return watch != null ? watch.currentDoc : null;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Gets the active collections (collections that exist) being watched
+     *
+     * @return an immutable set of active collection names
+     */
+    private Set<String> activeCollections() {
+      return this.entrySet().stream()
+          .filter(
+              (Entry<String, DocCollectionWatch<DocCollectionWatcher>> entry) ->
+                  entry.getValue().currentDoc != null)
+          .map(Entry::getKey)
+          .collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableSet());
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Updates the latest observed DocCollection (state) of the {@link DocCollectionWatch} if the
+     * collection is being watched
+     *
+     * @param collection the collection name
+     * @param newState the new DocCollection (state) observed
+     * @return whether an active watch exists for such collection
+     */
+    private boolean updateDocCollection(String collection, DocCollection newState) {
+      DocCollectionWatch<DocCollectionWatcher> watch = get(collection);
+      if (watch != null) {
+        DocCollection oldState = watch.currentDoc;
+        if (oldState == null && newState == null) {
+          // OK, the collection not yet exist in ZK
+        } else if (oldState == null) {
+          if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
+            log.debug("Add data for [{}] ver [{}]", collection, newState.getZNodeVersion());
+          }
+          watch.currentDoc = newState;
+        } else if (newState == null) {
+          log.debug("Removing cached collection state for [{}]", collection);
+          watch.currentDoc = null;
+        } else { // both new and old states are non-null
+          int oldCVersion =
+              oldState.getPerReplicaStates() == null ? -1 : oldState.getPerReplicaStates().cversion;
+          int newCVersion =
+              newState.getPerReplicaStates() == null ? -1 : newState.getPerReplicaStates().cversion;
+          if (oldState.getZNodeVersion() < newState.getZNodeVersion()
+              || oldCVersion < newCVersion) {
+            watch.currentDoc = newState;
+            if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
+              log.debug(
+                  "Updating data for [{}] from [{}] to [{}]",
+                  collection,
+                  oldState.getZNodeVersion(),
+                  newState.getZNodeVersion());
+            }
+          }
+        }
+        return true;
+      } else {
+        return false;
+      }
+    }

Review Comment:
   That's a good point and thank you for the suggestion! 😊 
   
   Yes synchronization is necessary to guarantee higher version is being taken where there are 2 concurrent calls with different versions of `newState`  
   
   Just a really minor nit, perhaps we can even remove the `if (watch != null)` check now was it's `computeIfPresent`?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org