You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/01/15 23:19:34 UTC

[jira] Updated: (SLING-160) Group bundles by symbolic name rather than by bundle id.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Tobias Bocanegra updated SLING-160:
-----------------------------------

    Summary: Group bundles by symbolic name rather than by bundle id.  (was: Group bundles by symbolic name than by bundle id.)

> Group bundles by symbolic name rather than by bundle id.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-160
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Console
>            Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
>
> from my experience the ordering of the bundles by bundle id is useless. i never needed to find a bundle by id.
> more common is the search for a specific bundle of which i know it's name or even it's symbolic name (since most symbolic names contain some package notation).
> so i think it would make more sense to group them by package in a first step. and maybe in a 2nd step to add some javascript that allows browsing the tree, i.e. expanding and collapsing the package nodes.
> WDYT? i volunteer to implement it, if you think it's a good idea. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.