OK to ship junit.jar? (Was: (DERBY-1846) Create a script...)

[Knut Anders Hatlen <Kn...@Sun.COM>]

"Andrew McIntyre (JIRA)" <de...@db.apache.org> writes:

>             
> Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1846:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> The jdbc4 classes depend on junit, which we are not able to ship.
[...]

The source distribution contains junit.jar. Is that a problem?

-- 
Knut Anders

Re: OK to ship junit.jar? (Was: (DERBY-1846) Create a script...)

[Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM>]

Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:

>"Andrew McIntyre (JIRA)" <de...@db.apache.org> writes:
>
>  
>
>>            
>>Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1846:
>>----------------------------------------
>>
>>The jdbc4 classes depend on junit, which we are not able to ship.
>>    
>>
>[...]
>
>The source distribution contains junit.jar. Is that a problem?
>
>  
>
That jar isn't under source control. I don't think we should be shipping 
it. If we do ship it, then we probably have to add some verbiage to the 
NOTICE file since junit is distributed under a non-Apache license (I 
continue to not be a lawyer). I vote for removing junit.jar from the 
source distributions.

Regards,
-Rick