You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@atlas.apache.org by "Madhan Neethiraj (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/05/17 15:58:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (ATLAS-1211) Classifications : Support subclasifications & ordering

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Madhan Neethiraj resolved ATLAS-1211.
-------------------------------------
    Resolution: Duplicate  (was: Fixed)

> Classifications : Support subclasifications & ordering
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ATLAS-1211
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1211
>             Project: Atlas
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Nigel Jones
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> Governance classifications may be ordered and contain sub-classifications.
> For example a classification "confidentiality" may contain an *ordered* set of values such as
>  - unclassified
>  - internal use
>  - confidential
>  - sensitive
>  - restricted
>  - top secret
> The ordering is a logical progression -- going from the least confidential to the most confidential. 
> When these governance classifications are retrieved or checked against we may wish to performance range checks. For example in a ranger policy we may wish to do the equivilent of "if confidentiality >= confidential then.."
> Furthermore these classifications may be hierarchical. The mail thread below uses the example "confidential/business confidential" and "confidential/personal confidential". these are at an equivilent level, but different
> Atlas should be extended to support this.(further JIRAs would be needed to update ranger)
> In terms of implementation, For existing apis/tag integration we may consider a form of flattening or overloading the name to ease migration.
> Note that this will prereq the anticipated work on ATLAS-1187 to introduce classifications, but I've split this further development out so that we can get a first pass done in 1187
> This suggestion first came up in the mailing list discussion on "Rename Trait to classification", which relates to ATLAS-1187 - also viewable on gmane at news://news.gmane.org:119/nt0jdp$ml0$1@blaine.gmane.org



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)