You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> on 2012/06/24 09:41:41 UTC
[VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and [2],
respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28 0800Z,
then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
[2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective trunks
as of this time.
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Clay Leeds <th...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Glenn & Vincent (& others) for your efforts!
Clay
"My religion is simple. My religion is kindness."
- HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet
On Jun 24, 2012, at 12:41 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and [2],
> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>
> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28 0800Z,
> then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
>
> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective trunks
> as of this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by mehdi houshmand <me...@gmail.com>.
Sorry Glenn, my bad, +1 from me.
Thanks,
Mehdi
On 28 June 2012 23:24, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
> Just a reminder to vote on this by tomorrow. At present, only three have
> responded to the vote.
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>
> > I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and
> [2],
> > respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
> > RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
> > the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
> >
> > If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
> > 0800Z, then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
> >
> > [1]
> > http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
> > [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
> >
> > Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective
> trunks
> > as of this time.
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
Just a reminder to vote on this by tomorrow. At present, only three have
responded to the vote.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and [2],
> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>
> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
> 0800Z, then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>
> [1]
> http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
>
> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective trunks
> as of this time.
>
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Clay Leeds <th...@gmail.com>.
> On 30/06/12 11:36, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>> Yes, I already plan to do this before cutting the final RC1 binaries,
>>> which I expect to do tomorrow (01JUL).
>>
>> The RC1 was meant to be frozen as soon as the vote was launched, since
>> we voted on signed artefacts corresponding to a precise version of the
>> repository.
>>
>> Any further change shall trigger a new vote, so I would leave this one
>> for the final release (or possibly an RC2).
>>
>> That is, according to my understanding of the release process...
>>
>
> ok that's fine, i will defer subsequent changes to the final 1.1 release
> (or an RC2 if it should be required)
I would think any new functionality would necessitate a new RC (unless we want a 1.1.1 if there are bugs... ;-)
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Vincent Hennebert <vh...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 30/06/12 11:36, Glenn Adams wrote:
> > Yes, I already plan to do this before cutting the final RC1 binaries,
> which
> > I expect to do tomorrow (01JUL).
>
> The RC1 was meant to be frozen as soon as the vote was launched, since
> we voted on signed artefacts corresponding to a precise version of the
> repository.
>
> Any further change shall trigger a new vote, so I would leave this one
> for the final release (or possibly an RC2).
>
> That is, according to my understanding of the release process...
>
ok that's fine, i will defer subsequent changes to the final 1.1 release
(or an RC2 if it should be required)
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Chris Bowditch <bo...@hotmail.com>.
On 02/07/2012 09:20, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> On 30/06/12 11:36, Glenn Adams wrote:
>> Yes, I already plan to do this before cutting the final RC1 binaries, which
>> I expect to do tomorrow (01JUL).
> The RC1 was meant to be frozen as soon as the vote was launched, since
> we voted on signed artefacts corresponding to a precise version of the
> repository.
That's my understanding too. Sorry Luis, I agree it would be nice to
squeeze your change in there but it will require a new build and a new
vote. It's not worth it when you consider that raw PNG is not the
default loader for PNG and it will still make the final release.
>
> Any further change shall trigger a new vote, so I would leave this one
> for the final release (or possibly an RC2).
+1
>
> That is, according to my understanding of the release process...
Mine too. Thanks,
Chris
>
> Vincent
>
>
>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to suggest that the last patch for bug 40676, which was
>>> submitted some hours after the RCs were cut, be included in the final
>>> release. Otherwise the raw PNG image loader will be crippled.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/29/12 3:20 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>>
>>>> Although there aren't as many votes as I would like, I have received 5 +1s
>>>> (including myself), and no negatives, so the vote passes. However, I will
>>>> wait until Monday, 07/02, to publish the RCs in case someone who didn't
>>>> vote wishes to raise an objection or has an issues that needs resolving.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and
>>>>> [2],
>>>>> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
>>>>> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
>>>>> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
>>>>> 0800Z, then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-**
>>>>> commons-1_5rc1/<http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/>
>>>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~**gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/<http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective
>>>>> trunks
>>>>> as of this time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@**xmlgraphics.apache.org<ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.**apache.org<ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Vincent Hennebert <vh...@gmail.com>.
On 30/06/12 11:36, Glenn Adams wrote:
> Yes, I already plan to do this before cutting the final RC1 binaries, which
> I expect to do tomorrow (01JUL).
The RC1 was meant to be frozen as soon as the vote was launched, since
we voted on signed artefacts corresponding to a precise version of the
repository.
Any further change shall trigger a new vote, so I would leave this one
for the final release (or possibly an RC2).
That is, according to my understanding of the release process...
Vincent
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> I would like to suggest that the last patch for bug 40676, which was
>> submitted some hours after the RCs were cut, be included in the final
>> release. Otherwise the raw PNG image loader will be crippled.
>>
>>
>> On 6/29/12 3:20 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>>> Although there aren't as many votes as I would like, I have received 5 +1s
>>> (including myself), and no negatives, so the vote passes. However, I will
>>> wait until Monday, 07/02, to publish the RCs in case someone who didn't
>>> vote wishes to raise an objection or has an issues that needs resolving.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and
>>>> [2],
>>>> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
>>>> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
>>>> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>>>>
>>>> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
>>>> 0800Z, then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-**
>>>> commons-1_5rc1/<http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/>
>>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~**gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/<http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/>
>>>>
>>>> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective
>>>> trunks
>>>> as of this time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@**xmlgraphics.apache.org<ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.**apache.org<ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
Yes, I already plan to do this before cutting the final RC1 binaries, which
I expect to do tomorrow (01JUL).
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> I would like to suggest that the last patch for bug 40676, which was
> submitted some hours after the RCs were cut, be included in the final
> release. Otherwise the raw PNG image loader will be crippled.
>
>
> On 6/29/12 3:20 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>> Although there aren't as many votes as I would like, I have received 5 +1s
>> (including myself), and no negatives, so the vote passes. However, I will
>> wait until Monday, 07/02, to publish the RCs in case someone who didn't
>> vote wishes to raise an objection or has an issues that needs resolving.
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and
>>> [2],
>>> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
>>> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
>>> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>>>
>>> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
>>> 0800Z, then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://people.apache.org/~**gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-**
>>> commons-1_5rc1/<http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/>
>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~**gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/<http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/>
>>>
>>> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective
>>> trunks
>>> as of this time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@**xmlgraphics.apache.org<ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.**apache.org<ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>.
I would like to suggest that the last patch for bug 40676, which was
submitted some hours after the RCs were cut, be included in the final
release. Otherwise the raw PNG image loader will be crippled.
On 6/29/12 3:20 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> Although there aren't as many votes as I would like, I have received 5 +1s
> (including myself), and no negatives, so the vote passes. However, I will
> wait until Monday, 07/02, to publish the RCs in case someone who didn't
> vote wishes to raise an objection or has an issues that needs resolving.
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>
>> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and [2],
>> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
>> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
>> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>>
>> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
>> 0800Z, then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>>
>> [1]
>> http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
>>
>> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective trunks
>> as of this time.
>>
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
Although there aren't as many votes as I would like, I have received 5 +1s
(including myself), and no negatives, so the vote passes. However, I will
wait until Monday, 07/02, to publish the RCs in case someone who didn't
vote wishes to raise an objection or has an issues that needs resolving.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and [2],
> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>
> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
> 0800Z, then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>
> [1]
> http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
>
> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective trunks
> as of this time.
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
thanks; i'll fix these in trunk and merge into 1.1 final release
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:20 PM, The Web Maestro
<th...@gmail.com>wrote:
> A couple of things I noticed (I don't believe they are SHOWSTOPPERS):
>
> 1. items in fop-1.1rc1/docs/fo/*.fo do *not* render (e.g., align.fo,
> embed.fo & size.fo) although fop-1.1rc1/docs/fo/fonts.fo *does*
> render!
>
> ===
> ERROR STACK:
> org.apache.fop.fo.ValidationException: For "fo:simple-page-master",
> "fo:region-body" must be declared before "fo:region-before"! (See
> position 20:41)
> ===
>
> 2. When generating the examples/fo/fo-reference doc, I get a bunch of
> WARNINGs about 'table-layout="auto"' not being implemented yet (one
> for each of the 26 pages, although it happens in any document the
> attribute is defined, like examples/fo/tables/*.fo,
> examples/fo/svg/embedding.fo, etc.):
>
> ===
> ./fop -v -xml examples/fo/fo-reference/xslfoRef.xml -xsl examples/fo/
> fo-reference/xml2pdf.xsl -pdf examples/fo/fo-reference/xml2pdf.xsl.pdf
> FOP Version 1.1rc1
> Jun 25, 2012 12:14:13 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> processEvent
> WARNING: The following feature isn't implemented by Apache FOP, yet:
> table-layout="auto" (on fo:table) (No context info available)
> Jun 25, 2012 12:14:14 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> processEvent
> INFO: Rendered page #1.
> ===
>
> I don't see these as SHOWSTOPPERS, here's my +1
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Clay Leeds
> --
> <th...@gmail.com> - <http://ourlil.com/>
> My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
> - HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pascal Sancho <ps...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Ok, Glenn,
> >
> > I'll fill in a bugzilla entry for that tomorow.
> > I'm not at my work environment,and I have to dive into fop-*-list
> > archives, I don't remember what recent change caused that break
> > (probably uri resolver or events).
> >
> > 2012/6/25 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>:
> >> Thanks for that info. Could you provide some more information so I can
> >> check further? How are you using/invoking fop-pdf-images to produce the
> >> error? Do you have a stack trace?
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Pascal Sancho <psancho.asf@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Glenn,
> >>>
> >>> good job!
> >>>
> >>> When using the fop-pdf-images, an ImageException is thrown. This will
> >>> introduce a limitation to fop 1.1RC1;
> >>> However, I encourage everybody to test this RC, so I vote +1, hoping
> >>> that the 1.1 production release will use safely the fop-pdf-images
> >>> addon.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2012/6/24 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>:
> >>> > I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and
> >>> [2],
> >>> > respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing
> these
> >>> > RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which
> time
> >>> > the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
> >>> >
> >>> > If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
> >>> 0800Z,
> >>> > then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
> >>> >
> >>> > [1]
> >>>
> http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
> >>> > [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
> >>> >
> >>> > Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective
> >>> trunks
> >>> > as of this time.
> >
> > --
> > pascal
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by The Web Maestro <th...@gmail.com>.
A couple of things I noticed (I don't believe they are SHOWSTOPPERS):
1. items in fop-1.1rc1/docs/fo/*.fo do *not* render (e.g., align.fo,
embed.fo & size.fo) although fop-1.1rc1/docs/fo/fonts.fo *does*
render!
===
ERROR STACK:
org.apache.fop.fo.ValidationException: For "fo:simple-page-master",
"fo:region-body" must be declared before "fo:region-before"! (See
position 20:41)
===
2. When generating the examples/fo/fo-reference doc, I get a bunch of
WARNINGs about 'table-layout="auto"' not being implemented yet (one
for each of the 26 pages, although it happens in any document the
attribute is defined, like examples/fo/tables/*.fo,
examples/fo/svg/embedding.fo, etc.):
===
./fop -v -xml examples/fo/fo-reference/xslfoRef.xml -xsl examples/fo/
fo-reference/xml2pdf.xsl -pdf examples/fo/fo-reference/xml2pdf.xsl.pdf
FOP Version 1.1rc1
Jun 25, 2012 12:14:13 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent
WARNING: The following feature isn't implemented by Apache FOP, yet:
table-layout="auto" (on fo:table) (No context info available)
Jun 25, 2012 12:14:14 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent
INFO: Rendered page #1.
===
I don't see these as SHOWSTOPPERS, here's my +1
Kind regards,
Clay Leeds
--
<th...@gmail.com> - <http://ourlil.com/>
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pascal Sancho <ps...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, Glenn,
>
> I'll fill in a bugzilla entry for that tomorow.
> I'm not at my work environment,and I have to dive into fop-*-list
> archives, I don't remember what recent change caused that break
> (probably uri resolver or events).
>
> 2012/6/25 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>:
>> Thanks for that info. Could you provide some more information so I can
>> check further? How are you using/invoking fop-pdf-images to produce the
>> error? Do you have a stack trace?
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Pascal Sancho <ps...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Glenn,
>>>
>>> good job!
>>>
>>> When using the fop-pdf-images, an ImageException is thrown. This will
>>> introduce a limitation to fop 1.1RC1;
>>> However, I encourage everybody to test this RC, so I vote +1, hoping
>>> that the 1.1 production release will use safely the fop-pdf-images
>>> addon.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/6/24 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>:
>>> > I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and
>>> [2],
>>> > respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
>>> > RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
>>> > the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>>> >
>>> > If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
>>> 0800Z,
>>> > then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
>>> > [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
>>> >
>>> > Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective
>>> trunks
>>> > as of this time.
>
> --
> pascal
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Pascal Sancho <ps...@gmail.com>.
Ok, Glenn,
I'll fill in a bugzilla entry for that tomorow.
I'm not at my work environment,and I have to dive into fop-*-list
archives, I don't remember what recent change caused that break
(probably uri resolver or events).
2012/6/25 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>:
> Thanks for that info. Could you provide some more information so I can
> check further? How are you using/invoking fop-pdf-images to produce the
> error? Do you have a stack trace?
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Pascal Sancho <ps...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Glenn,
>>
>> good job!
>>
>> When using the fop-pdf-images, an ImageException is thrown. This will
>> introduce a limitation to fop 1.1RC1;
>> However, I encourage everybody to test this RC, so I vote +1, hoping
>> that the 1.1 production release will use safely the fop-pdf-images
>> addon.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/6/24 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>:
>> > I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and
>> [2],
>> > respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
>> > RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
>> > the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>> >
>> > If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
>> 0800Z,
>> > then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>> >
>> > [1]
>> http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
>> > [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
>> >
>> > Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective
>> trunks
>> > as of this time.
--
pascal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
Thanks for that info. Could you provide some more information so I can
check further? How are you using/invoking fop-pdf-images to produce the
error? Do you have a stack trace?
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Pascal Sancho <ps...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Glenn,
>
> good job!
>
> When using the fop-pdf-images, an ImageException is thrown. This will
> introduce a limitation to fop 1.1RC1;
> However, I encourage everybody to test this RC, so I vote +1, hoping
> that the 1.1 production release will use safely the fop-pdf-images
> addon.
>
>
>
> 2012/6/24 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>:
> > I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and
> [2],
> > respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
> > RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
> > the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
> >
> > If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
> 0800Z,
> > then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
> >
> > [1]
> http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
> > [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
> >
> > Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective
> trunks
> > as of this time.
>
>
>
> --
> pascal
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Pascal Sancho <ps...@gmail.com>.
Hi Glenn,
good job!
When using the fop-pdf-images, an ImageException is thrown. This will
introduce a limitation to fop 1.1RC1;
However, I encourage everybody to test this RC, so I vote +1, hoping
that the 1.1 production release will use safely the fop-pdf-images
addon.
2012/6/24 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>:
> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and [2],
> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>
> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28 0800Z,
> then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
>
> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective trunks
> as of this time.
--
pascal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Chris Bowditch <bo...@hotmail.com>.
On 24/06/2012 08:41, Glenn Adams wrote:
Hi Glenn,
> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and [2],
> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
Thanks for preparing the release. I've downloaded it and run a couple of
test FOs. Looks good to me.
>
> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28 0800Z,
> then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
+1
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
>
> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective trunks
> as of this time.
Thanks,
Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Vincent Hennebert <vh...@gmail.com>.
I’ve just done it for the items I suggested. I let your re-phrase the
complex scripts one to your liking. I think what we want in this file is
headline type bullets with as few details as possible. Details belong
elsewhere.
Thanks,
Vincent
On 29/06/12 20:26, Glenn Adams wrote:
> Sounds good. I'll make those changes before cutting the final RC1 binaries.
> Do you have any more detail you would like to add for the three bullets
> below? Or would you simply prefer headline type bullets (with no/less
> detail)?
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Vincent Hennebert <vh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> +1, a bit late, sorry.
>>
>> The ‘Major Changes’ section in the FOP README is too technical. All
>> 3 items should be grouped into a single one merely called ‘Added support
>> for complex scripts (Arabic <add other supported scripts here>)’. They
>> all are facets of a same feature really.
>>
>> Also, the following new feature should probably also be mentioned there:
>> • support for TTF fonts in PostScript;
>> • support for PDF Object Streams;
>> • support for PDF 128bit encryption.
>>
>>
>> Vincent
>>
>>
>> On 24/06/2012 08:41, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>>> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and [2],
>>> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
>>> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
>>> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>>>
>>> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
>>> 0800Z,
>>> then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>>>
>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~**gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-**
>>> commons-1_5rc1/<http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/>
>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~**gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/<http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/>
>>>
>>> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective trunks
>>> as of this time.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@**xmlgraphics.apache.org<ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.**apache.org<ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
Sounds good. I'll make those changes before cutting the final RC1 binaries.
Do you have any more detail you would like to add for the three bullets
below? Or would you simply prefer headline type bullets (with no/less
detail)?
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Vincent Hennebert <vh...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1, a bit late, sorry.
>
> The ‘Major Changes’ section in the FOP README is too technical. All
> 3 items should be grouped into a single one merely called ‘Added support
> for complex scripts (Arabic <add other supported scripts here>)’. They
> all are facets of a same feature really.
>
> Also, the following new feature should probably also be mentioned there:
> • support for TTF fonts in PostScript;
> • support for PDF Object Streams;
> • support for PDF 128bit encryption.
>
>
> Vincent
>
>
> On 24/06/2012 08:41, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and [2],
>> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
>> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
>> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>>
>> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28
>> 0800Z,
>> then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>>
>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~**gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-**
>> commons-1_5rc1/<http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/>
>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~**gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/<http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/>
>>
>> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective trunks
>> as of this time.
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@**xmlgraphics.apache.org<ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.**apache.org<ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 Candidate Releases
Posted by Vincent Hennebert <vh...@gmail.com>.
+1, a bit late, sorry.
The ‘Major Changes’ section in the FOP README is too technical. All
3 items should be grouped into a single one merely called ‘Added support
for complex scripts (Arabic <add other supported scripts here>)’. They
all are facets of a same feature really.
Also, the following new feature should probably also be mentioned there:
• support for TTF fonts in PostScript;
• support for PDF Object Streams;
• support for PDF 128bit encryption.
Vincent
On 24/06/2012 08:41, Glenn Adams wrote:
> I have posted release candidates XGC 1.5rc1 and FOP 1.1rc1 at [1] and [2],
> respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on publishing these
> RCs, to serve as such for a period of at least 30 days, after which time
> the final XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 will be proposed for publishing.
>
> If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by JUN28 0800Z,
> then I will publish to the appropriate sites.
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5rc1/
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1rc1/
>
> Note that both of these RCs contain all commits to their respective trunks
> as of this time.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org