You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Stefan Eissing <st...@eissing.org> on 2022/06/04 12:59:41 UTC
[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as httpd-2.4.54
Hi all,
next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as 2.4.54:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
sha256: fd461abb356592386e7de90835f888fa4eb0ce225a89986c38108bdcbce466ef *httpd-2.4.54-rc2.tar.gz
sha512: 6267d43aca3c278a0b428633a41ddea346d73a1c94fa3e9d54a600e8c7ab71b4a7772c7dbbcd552a802606416c2f6193ceaa0c6bcf07fe2b61cf175cb48b892f *httpd-2.4.54-rc2.tar.gz
The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.54-rc2-candidate.
Kind regards,
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as httpd-2.4.54
Posted by Stefan Eissing <st...@eissing.org>.
FYI: Had a DNS problem (it's always dns!) on my mail server, resulting in rejected incoming mails. Should work again now...
> Am 06.06.2022 um 13:09 schrieb Stefan Eissing <st...@eissing.org>:
>
> Guys, shall I make an rc3 with the recent apr version check changes? It seems the correct way to handle this...
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
>> Am 06.06.2022 um 10:12 schrieb giovanni@paclan.it:
>>
>> On 6/4/22 14:59, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
>>>
>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>>
>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as 2.4.54:
>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>>
>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>>> sha256: fd461abb356592386e7de90835f888fa4eb0ce225a89986c38108bdcbce466ef *httpd-2.4.54-rc2.tar.gz
>>> sha512: 6267d43aca3c278a0b428633a41ddea346d73a1c94fa3e9d54a600e8c7ab71b4a7772c7dbbcd552a802606416c2f6193ceaa0c6bcf07fe2b61cf175cb48b892f *httpd-2.4.54-rc2.tar.gz
>>>
>>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.54-rc2-candidate.
>>>
>> +1
>> tested on Fedora 36, OpenBSD 7.1 and OpenBSD-current
>>
>> Giovanni
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as httpd-2.4.54
Posted by Stefan Eissing <st...@eissing.org>.
> Am 06.06.2022 um 16:11 schrieb Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>:
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 7:09 AM Stefan Eissing <st...@eissing.org> wrote:
>>
>> Guys, shall I make an rc3 with the recent apr version check changes? It seems the correct way to handle this...
>
> Especially given limited votes, I think so.
Agreed, I cancel the vote for rc2 and will announce rc3 soon.
Thanks,
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as httpd-2.4.54
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 7:09 AM Stefan Eissing <st...@eissing.org> wrote:
>
> Guys, shall I make an rc3 with the recent apr version check changes? It seems the correct way to handle this...
Especially given limited votes, I think so.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as httpd-2.4.54
Posted by Stefan Eissing <st...@eissing.org>.
Guys, shall I make an rc3 with the recent apr version check changes? It seems the correct way to handle this...
Cheers,
Stefan
> Am 06.06.2022 um 10:12 schrieb giovanni@paclan.it:
>
> On 6/4/22 14:59, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
>>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as 2.4.54:
>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>
>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>> sha256: fd461abb356592386e7de90835f888fa4eb0ce225a89986c38108bdcbce466ef *httpd-2.4.54-rc2.tar.gz
>> sha512: 6267d43aca3c278a0b428633a41ddea346d73a1c94fa3e9d54a600e8c7ab71b4a7772c7dbbcd552a802606416c2f6193ceaa0c6bcf07fe2b61cf175cb48b892f *httpd-2.4.54-rc2.tar.gz
>>
>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.54-rc2-candidate.
>>
> +1
> tested on Fedora 36, OpenBSD 7.1 and OpenBSD-current
>
> Giovanni
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as httpd-2.4.54
Posted by gi...@paclan.it.
On 6/4/22 14:59, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as 2.4.54:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha256: fd461abb356592386e7de90835f888fa4eb0ce225a89986c38108bdcbce466ef *httpd-2.4.54-rc2.tar.gz
> sha512: 6267d43aca3c278a0b428633a41ddea346d73a1c94fa3e9d54a600e8c7ab71b4a7772c7dbbcd552a802606416c2f6193ceaa0c6bcf07fe2b61cf175cb48b892f *httpd-2.4.54-rc2.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.54-rc2-candidate.
>
+1
tested on Fedora 36, OpenBSD 7.1 and OpenBSD-current
Giovanni
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as httpd-2.4.54
Posted by Noel Butler <no...@ausics.net>.
On 05/06/2022 06:21, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 4:17 PM John Doe <gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Eric's fix did not fix because I'm building with APR 1.7.0.
>>
>> In apr.hw 1.7.0 there is
>> /* If we have a TCP implementation that can be "corked", what flag
>> * do we use?
>> */
>> #define APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG @apr_tcp_nopush_flag@
>>
>> /* Is the TCP_NODELAY socket option inherited from listening sockets?
>>
>> It looks like Yann has fixed this in apr 1.7 & 1.8. So I guess apr
>> needs to T&R 1.7.1 minimum.
>> For the work around until then,httpd needs to look for <= < 1.7, not
>> 6.
>
> Darn, I only checked in SVN. Thanks for catching it. I updated httpd
> just now.
The issue that needs addressing is APR and APR util are YEARS OLD, this
requires manual patching to build for wg any of the past 2 years worth
of mariadb packages. a few piss poor attempts were talked about even as
earlier this year, but as usual, it went nowhere.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written authority to do so.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then
delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately.
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as httpd-2.4.54
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 4:17 PM John Doe <gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Eric's fix did not fix because I'm building with APR 1.7.0.
>
> In apr.hw 1.7.0 there is
> /* If we have a TCP implementation that can be "corked", what flag
> * do we use?
> */
> #define APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG @apr_tcp_nopush_flag@
>
> /* Is the TCP_NODELAY socket option inherited from listening sockets?
>
> It looks like Yann has fixed this in apr 1.7 & 1.8. So I guess apr needs to T&R 1.7.1 minimum.
> For the work around until then,httpd needs to look for <= < 1.7, not 6.
Darn, I only checked in SVN. Thanks for catching it. I updated httpd just now.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as httpd-2.4.54
Posted by John Doe <gh...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Eric's fix did not fix because I'm building with APR 1.7.0.
In apr.hw 1.7.0 there is
/* If we have a TCP implementation that can be "corked", what flag
* do we use?
*/
#define APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG @apr_tcp_nopush_flag@
/* Is the TCP_NODELAY socket option inherited from listening sockets?
It looks like Yann has fixed this in apr 1.7 & 1.8. So I guess apr needs to
T&R 1.7.1 minimum.
For the work around until then,httpd needs to look for <= < 1.7, not 6.
Gregg
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 8:45 AM Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 8:59 AM Stefan Eissing <st...@eissing.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
> >
> > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
> >
> > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as 2.4.54:
> > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> +1 AIX/xlc/ppc64 100% pass in maintainer mode (but limited modules)
>
> Thanks for RM'ing!
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as httpd-2.4.54
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 8:59 AM Stefan Eissing <st...@eissing.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as 2.4.54:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
+1 AIX/xlc/ppc64 100% pass in maintainer mode (but limited modules)
Thanks for RM'ing!