Re: sandbox [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

[Martin Cooper <mf...@gmail.com>]

On 6/25/05, Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >>is boils down to the question: does this subproject need it's own
> >>sandbox or will neophyte components start in the jakarta commons
> >>sandbox?
> >
> > +1 for sandbox (non-binding)
> >
> > Its slightly hard to imagine anything otherwise, but maybe I'm just
> > used to seeing how commons and taglibs work. If Taglibs join, we have
> > a bunch of Taglibs in sandbox, they will need to be housed somewhere,
> > and I don't see them migrating to commons sandbox ;-) Right?
> 
> Yes, +1 to a sandbox. Although it can create issues, I think has more
> benefits than downsides.

+1

--
Martin Cooper


> Stephen
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org