You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Philippe Mouawad <p....@ubik-ingenierie.com> on 2020/12/07 12:58:21 UTC
Release 5.4.1
Hello,
It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some regressions and
issues with Darklaf.
Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was introduced issues
with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix those issues
which is great.
But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience (at least the
ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the manual tests me
wake as part of our release process neither.
I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on Windows 10.
I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one customer, this is
how I reported them.
@Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch back to System
LAFs.
Regards
--
Cordialement
Philippe M.
Ubik-Ingenierie
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 11. Januar 2021 12:49:53 MEZ schrieb Milamber <mi...@apache.org>:
>
>I can start the release process for 5.4.1 today?
That would be awesome
Felix
>
>On 09/01/2021 22:04, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>> Am 09.01.21 um 17:45 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>> Hello Felix,
>>> My answers inline below.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:28 PM Felix Schumacher
>>> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 09.01.21 um 15:28 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> First best wishes for 2021 for all the team, I hope you're all
>>>> doing fine !
>>>>
>>>> Second, I think we should release a 5.4.1 now.
>>>> On my side I've been testing it for few days on Mac OSX and I
>>>> also made some tests on Windows, my colleague did it on Linux.
>>>>
>>>> The last bug on JTree due to Darklaf
>>>> (https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/228) was already
>there
>>>> in 5.3 and it's not that problematic.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>> I would like to hear your opinion on the bugs 65053 and 65034.
>>>
>>> Bug 65053 is about downgrading JSONPath to 2.4.0 due to a bug
>with
>>> regex parsing. I think we could go back to 2.4.0 without
>loosing
>>> too much.
>>>
>>> Ok by me, sounds acceptable.
>>>
>>> Bug 65034 is about an old bug(?) in handling reading of
>>> binarytcpclient when no EOM is set. Those requests will always
>>> fail (at least in my tests). I think we should change the
>>> behaviour for the case when no EOM is given to not fail on
>>> SocketTimeoutException.
>>>
>>>
>>> I looked at your patch, it looks good to me. Thanks
>> Both committed.
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>> Apart from that, I am in favour of releasing soon (or even now
>:) )
>>>
>>> Felix
>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:27 PM Felix Schumacher
>>>> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>>> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad
>>>> <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
><ma...@gmail.com>>:
>>>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>>> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe
>Mouawad <
>>>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>> <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>>>> >> >Hello,
>>>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf
>upgrade ?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans
>>>> while working
>>>> >on the
>>>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on
>>>> Ubuntu with
>>>> >Darklaf
>>>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do
>it
>>>> yet.
>>>>
>>>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for
>the rc.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>>>
>>>> I don't have that os :)
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> How long should we calculate?
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and
>Windows,
>>>> what do
>>>> >you
>>>> >think ?
>>>>
>>>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but
>if
>>>> you want to have a bit more than the minimal testing that
>has
>>>> been performed by the reporters of the last issues (all
>>>> windows based I believe), then we should wait a bit more
>and
>>>> test actively on windows.
>>>>
>>>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the
>>>> level of testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux
>>>> seems to work great ;) in the mean time I will try to test
>on
>>>> windows, too.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Regards
>>>> >> Felix
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >Thanks
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber
>>>> <milamber@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>
>>>> >wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>>> >> >> > Hi all,
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give
>people
>>>> time for
>>>> >> >feedback on
>>>> >> >> > the last release.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as
>RM?
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Regards
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Felix
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due
>to
>>>> some
>>>> >> >regressions
>>>> >> >> and
>>>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release.
>I
>>>> would like
>>>> >to
>>>> >> >wait a
>>>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported
>(not
>>>> weeks,
>>>> >> >though).
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly
>since
>>>> it was
>>>> >> >introduced
>>>> >> >> issues
>>>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very
>>>> reactive to fix
>>>> >> >those
>>>> >> >> issues
>>>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI
>>>> experience
>>>> >(at
>>>> >> >least
>>>> >> >> the
>>>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not
>stable.
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect
>them.
>>>> And the
>>>> >> >manual
>>>> >> >> tests me
>>>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only
>>>> sometimes on
>>>> >> >Windows 10.
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use
>it
>>>> for one
>>>> >> >customer,
>>>> >> >> this is
>>>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more
>>>> automated
>>>> >tests
>>>> >> >for the
>>>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving
>test
>>>> plans on a
>>>> >> >Windows
>>>> >> >> OS.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing)
>GUI?
>>>> What would
>>>> >be
>>>> >> >a good
>>>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic
>stuff
>>>> like
>>>> >opening
>>>> >> >a test
>>>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we
>should
>>>> switch
>>>> >back
>>>> >> >to
>>>> >> >> System
>>>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Regards
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Felix
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> Regards
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello Milamber,
Ok by me.
Regards
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:49 PM Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I can start the release process for 5.4.1 today?
>
> On 09/01/2021 22:04, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> > Am 09.01.21 um 17:45 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >> Hello Felix,
> >> My answers inline below.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:28 PM Felix Schumacher
> >> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
> >> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 09.01.21 um 15:28 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> First best wishes for 2021 for all the team, I hope you're all
> >>> doing fine !
> >>>
> >>> Second, I think we should release a 5.4.1 now.
> >>> On my side I've been testing it for few days on Mac OSX and I
> >>> also made some tests on Windows, my colleague did it on Linux.
> >>>
> >>> The last bug on JTree due to Darklaf
> >>> (https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/228) was already there
> >>> in 5.3 and it's not that problematic.
> >>>
> >>> WDYT ?
> >> I would like to hear your opinion on the bugs 65053 and 65034.
> >>
> >> Bug 65053 is about downgrading JSONPath to 2.4.0 due to a bug with
> >> regex parsing. I think we could go back to 2.4.0 without loosing
> >> too much.
> >>
> >> Ok by me, sounds acceptable.
> >>
> >> Bug 65034 is about an old bug(?) in handling reading of
> >> binarytcpclient when no EOM is set. Those requests will always
> >> fail (at least in my tests). I think we should change the
> >> behaviour for the case when no EOM is given to not fail on
> >> SocketTimeoutException.
> >>
> >>
> >> I looked at your patch, it looks good to me. Thanks
> > Both committed.
> >
> > Felix
> >
> >> Apart from that, I am in favour of releasing soon (or even now :) )
> >>
> >> Felix
> >>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Philippe
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:27 PM Felix Schumacher
> >>> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
> >>> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad
> >>> <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <mailto:
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>>:
> >>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
> >>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
> >>> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad
> <
> >>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >>> <ma...@gmail.com>>:
> >>> >> >Hello,
> >>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans
> >>> while working
> >>> >on the
> >>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on
> >>> Ubuntu with
> >>> >Darklaf
> >>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
> >>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
> >>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it
> >>> yet.
> >>>
> >>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the
> rc.
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
> >>>
> >>> I don't have that os :)
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> How long should we calculate?
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows,
> >>> what do
> >>> >you
> >>> >think ?
> >>>
> >>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if
> >>> you want to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has
> >>> been performed by the reporters of the last issues (all
> >>> windows based I believe), then we should wait a bit more and
> >>> test actively on windows.
> >>>
> >>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the
> >>> level of testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux
> >>> seems to work great ;) in the mean time I will try to test on
> >>> windows, too.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Felix
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Regards
> >>> >> Felix
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >Thanks
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber
> >>> <milamber@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> >>> >> >> > Hi all,
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people
> >>> time for
> >>> >> >feedback on
> >>> >> >> > the last release.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Regards
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Felix
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> >>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >>> >> >> >>> Hello,
> >>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to
> >>> some
> >>> >> >regressions
> >>> >> >> and
> >>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
> >>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I
> >>> would like
> >>> >to
> >>> >> >wait a
> >>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not
> >>> weeks,
> >>> >> >though).
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since
> >>> it was
> >>> >> >introduced
> >>> >> >> issues
> >>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very
> >>> reactive to fix
> >>> >> >those
> >>> >> >> issues
> >>> >> >> >>> which is great.
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI
> >>> experience
> >>> >(at
> >>> >> >least
> >>> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not
> stable.
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
> >>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them.
> >>> And the
> >>> >> >manual
> >>> >> >> tests me
> >>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
> >>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only
> >>> sometimes on
> >>> >> >Windows 10.
> >>> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it
> >>> for one
> >>> >> >customer,
> >>> >> >> this is
> >>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
> >>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more
> >>> automated
> >>> >tests
> >>> >> >for the
> >>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test
> >>> plans on a
> >>> >> >Windows
> >>> >> >> OS.
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI?
> >>> What would
> >>> >be
> >>> >> >a good
> >>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff
> >>> like
> >>> >opening
> >>> >> >a test
> >>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
> >>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should
> >>> switch
> >>> >back
> >>> >> >to
> >>> >> >> System
> >>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
> >>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> Regards
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> Felix
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>> Regards
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Cordialement.
> >>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cordialement.
> >> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>
> >>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Milamber <mi...@apache.org>.
I can start the release process for 5.4.1 today?
On 09/01/2021 22:04, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> Am 09.01.21 um 17:45 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>> Hello Felix,
>> My answers inline below.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:28 PM Felix Schumacher
>> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 09.01.21 um 15:28 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>> Hello,
>>> First best wishes for 2021 for all the team, I hope you're all
>>> doing fine !
>>>
>>> Second, I think we should release a 5.4.1 now.
>>> On my side I've been testing it for few days on Mac OSX and I
>>> also made some tests on Windows, my colleague did it on Linux.
>>>
>>> The last bug on JTree due to Darklaf
>>> (https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/228) was already there
>>> in 5.3 and it's not that problematic.
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>> I would like to hear your opinion on the bugs 65053 and 65034.
>>
>> Bug 65053 is about downgrading JSONPath to 2.4.0 due to a bug with
>> regex parsing. I think we could go back to 2.4.0 without loosing
>> too much.
>>
>> Ok by me, sounds acceptable.
>>
>> Bug 65034 is about an old bug(?) in handling reading of
>> binarytcpclient when no EOM is set. Those requests will always
>> fail (at least in my tests). I think we should change the
>> behaviour for the case when no EOM is given to not fail on
>> SocketTimeoutException.
>>
>>
>> I looked at your patch, it looks good to me. Thanks
> Both committed.
>
> Felix
>
>> Apart from that, I am in favour of releasing soon (or even now :) )
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>> Regards
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:27 PM Felix Schumacher
>>> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad
>>> <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>>> >> >Hello,
>>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>>> >>
>>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>> >>
>>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans
>>> while working
>>> >on the
>>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on
>>> Ubuntu with
>>> >Darklaf
>>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it
>>> yet.
>>>
>>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>>
>>> I don't have that os :)
>>>
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>> >>
>>> >> How long should we calculate?
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows,
>>> what do
>>> >you
>>> >think ?
>>>
>>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if
>>> you want to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has
>>> been performed by the reporters of the last issues (all
>>> windows based I believe), then we should wait a bit more and
>>> test actively on windows.
>>>
>>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the
>>> level of testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux
>>> seems to work great ;) in the mean time I will try to test on
>>> windows, too.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Felix
>>>
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> Felix
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Thanks
>>> >> >
>>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber
>>> <milamber@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>> >> >> > Hi all,
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people
>>> time for
>>> >> >feedback on
>>> >> >> > the last release.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Regards
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Felix
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to
>>> some
>>> >> >regressions
>>> >> >> and
>>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I
>>> would like
>>> >to
>>> >> >wait a
>>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not
>>> weeks,
>>> >> >though).
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since
>>> it was
>>> >> >introduced
>>> >> >> issues
>>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very
>>> reactive to fix
>>> >> >those
>>> >> >> issues
>>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI
>>> experience
>>> >(at
>>> >> >least
>>> >> >> the
>>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them.
>>> And the
>>> >> >manual
>>> >> >> tests me
>>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only
>>> sometimes on
>>> >> >Windows 10.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it
>>> for one
>>> >> >customer,
>>> >> >> this is
>>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more
>>> automated
>>> >tests
>>> >> >for the
>>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test
>>> plans on a
>>> >> >Windows
>>> >> >> OS.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI?
>>> What would
>>> >be
>>> >> >a good
>>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff
>>> like
>>> >opening
>>> >> >a test
>>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should
>>> switch
>>> >back
>>> >> >to
>>> >> >> System
>>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Regards
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Felix
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> Regards
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 09.01.21 um 17:45 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hello Felix,
> My answers inline below.
>
> Regards
>
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:28 PM Felix Schumacher
> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.01.21 um 15:28 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>> Hello,
>> First best wishes for 2021 for all the team, I hope you're all
>> doing fine !
>>
>> Second, I think we should release a 5.4.1 now.
>> On my side I've been testing it for few days on Mac OSX and I
>> also made some tests on Windows, my colleague did it on Linux.
>>
>> The last bug on JTree due to Darklaf
>> (https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/228) was already there
>> in 5.3 and it's not that problematic.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>
> I would like to hear your opinion on the bugs 65053 and 65034.
>
> Bug 65053 is about downgrading JSONPath to 2.4.0 due to a bug with
> regex parsing. I think we could go back to 2.4.0 without loosing
> too much.
>
> Ok by me, sounds acceptable.
>
> Bug 65034 is about an old bug(?) in handling reading of
> binarytcpclient when no EOM is set. Those requests will always
> fail (at least in my tests). I think we should change the
> behaviour for the case when no EOM is given to not fail on
> SocketTimeoutException.
>
>
> I looked at your patch, it looks good to me. Thanks
Both committed.
Felix
> Apart from that, I am in favour of releasing soon (or even now :) )
>
> Felix
>
>> Regards
>> Philippe
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:27 PM Felix Schumacher
>> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad
>> <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>> >> >Hello,
>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>> >>
>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>> >>
>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans
>> while working
>> >on the
>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on
>> Ubuntu with
>> >Darklaf
>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it
>> yet.
>>
>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>
>> >
>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>
>> I don't have that os :)
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>> >>
>> >> How long should we calculate?
>> >>
>> >
>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows,
>> what do
>> >you
>> >think ?
>>
>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if
>> you want to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has
>> been performed by the reporters of the last issues (all
>> windows based I believe), then we should wait a bit more and
>> test actively on windows.
>>
>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the
>> level of testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux
>> seems to work great ;) in the mean time I will try to test on
>> windows, too.
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Felix
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber
>> <milamber@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>
>> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people
>> time for
>> >> >feedback on
>> >> >> > the last release.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Regards
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Felix
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to
>> some
>> >> >regressions
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I
>> would like
>> >to
>> >> >wait a
>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not
>> weeks,
>> >> >though).
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since
>> it was
>> >> >introduced
>> >> >> issues
>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very
>> reactive to fix
>> >> >those
>> >> >> issues
>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI
>> experience
>> >(at
>> >> >least
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them.
>> And the
>> >> >manual
>> >> >> tests me
>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only
>> sometimes on
>> >> >Windows 10.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it
>> for one
>> >> >customer,
>> >> >> this is
>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more
>> automated
>> >tests
>> >> >for the
>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test
>> plans on a
>> >> >Windows
>> >> >> OS.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI?
>> What would
>> >be
>> >> >a good
>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff
>> like
>> >opening
>> >> >a test
>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should
>> switch
>> >back
>> >> >to
>> >> >> System
>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Felix
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Regards
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello Felix,
My answers inline below.
Regards
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:28 PM Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
> Am 09.01.21 um 15:28 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>
> Hello,
> First best wishes for 2021 for all the team, I hope you're all doing fine !
>
> Second, I think we should release a 5.4.1 now.
> On my side I've been testing it for few days on Mac OSX and I also made
> some tests on Windows, my colleague did it on Linux.
>
> The last bug on JTree due to Darklaf (
> https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/228) was already there in 5.3 and
> it's not that problematic.
>
>
> WDYT ?
>
> I would like to hear your opinion on the bugs 65053 and 65034.
>
> Bug 65053 is about downgrading JSONPath to 2.4.0 due to a bug with regex
> parsing. I think we could go back to 2.4.0 without loosing too much.
>
Ok by me, sounds acceptable.
> Bug 65034 is about an old bug(?) in handling reading of binarytcpclient
> when no EOM is set. Those requests will always fail (at least in my tests).
> I think we should change the behaviour for the case when no EOM is given to
> not fail on SocketTimeoutException.
>
I looked at your patch, it looks good to me. Thanks
> Apart from that, I am in favour of releasing soon (or even now :) )
>
> Felix
>
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:27 PM Felix Schumacher <
> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>> >> >Hello,
>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>> >>
>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>> >>
>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
>> >on the
>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
>> >Darklaf
>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>>
>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>
>> >
>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>
>> I don't have that os :)
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>> >>
>> >> How long should we calculate?
>> >>
>> >
>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
>> >you
>> >think ?
>>
>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want to
>> have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by the
>> reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we should
>> wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>>
>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of
>> testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in
>> the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Felix
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>> >> >feedback on
>> >> >> > the last release.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Regards
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Felix
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>> >> >regressions
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like
>> >to
>> >> >wait a
>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>> >> >though).
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>> >> >introduced
>> >> >> issues
>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix
>> >> >those
>> >> >> issues
>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
>> >(at
>> >> >least
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
>> >> >manual
>> >> >> tests me
>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
>> >> >Windows 10.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>> >> >customer,
>> >> >> this is
>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
>> >tests
>> >> >for the
>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a
>> >> >Windows
>> >> >> OS.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would
>> >be
>> >> >a good
>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
>> >opening
>> >> >a test
>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
>> >back
>> >> >to
>> >> >> System
>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Felix
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Regards
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 09.01.21 um 15:28 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hello,
> First best wishes for 2021 for all the team, I hope you're all doing
> fine !
>
> Second, I think we should release a 5.4.1 now.
> On my side I've been testing it for few days on Mac OSX and I also
> made some tests on Windows, my colleague did it on Linux.
>
> The last bug on JTree due to Darklaf
> (https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/228) was already there in 5.3
> and it's not that problematic.
>
> WDYT ?
I would like to hear your opinion on the bugs 65053 and 65034.
Bug 65053 is about downgrading JSONPath to 2.4.0 due to a bug with regex
parsing. I think we could go back to 2.4.0 without loosing too much.
Bug 65034 is about an old bug(?) in handling reading of binarytcpclient
when no EOM is set. Those requests will always fail (at least in my
tests). I think we should change the behaviour for the case when no EOM
is given to not fail on SocketTimeoutException.
Apart from that, I am in favour of releasing soon (or even now :) )
Felix
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:27 PM Felix Schumacher
> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad
> <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>:
> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
> <ma...@internetallee.de>> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>:
> >> >Hello,
> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
> >>
> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
> >>
> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
> >on the
> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
> >Darklaf
> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
> >>
> >
> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>
> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>
> >
> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>
> I don't have that os :)
>
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
> >>
> >> How long should we calculate?
> >>
> >
> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
> >you
> >think ?
>
> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you
> want to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been
> performed by the reporters of the last issues (all windows based I
> believe), then we should wait a bit more and test actively on
> windows.
>
> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of
> testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work
> great ;) in the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> >
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Felix
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Thanks
> >> >
> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <milamber@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>>
> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
> >> >>
> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> >> >> > Hi all,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
> >> >feedback on
> >> >> > the last release.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Regards
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Felix
> >> >> >
> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
> >> >regressions
> >> >> and
> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would
> like
> >to
> >> >wait a
> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
> >> >though).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
> >> >introduced
> >> >> issues
> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive
> to fix
> >> >those
> >> >> issues
> >> >> >>> which is great.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
> >(at
> >> >least
> >> >> the
> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
> >> >manual
> >> >> tests me
> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
> >> >Windows 10.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
> >> >customer,
> >> >> this is
> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
> >tests
> >> >for the
> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test
> plans on a
> >> >Windows
> >> >> OS.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What
> would
> >be
> >> >a good
> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
> >opening
> >> >a test
> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
> >back
> >> >to
> >> >> System
> >> >> >>> LAFs.
> >> >> >> That is always possible.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Regards
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Felix
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Regards
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
First best wishes for 2021 for all the team, I hope you're all doing fine !
Second, I think we should release a 5.4.1 now.
On my side I've been testing it for few days on Mac OSX and I also made
some tests on Windows, my colleague did it on Linux.
The last bug on JTree due to Darklaf (
https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/228) was already there in 5.3 and
it's not that problematic.
WDYT ?
Regards
Philippe
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:27 PM Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
> >> >Hello,
> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
> >>
> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
> >>
> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
> >on the
> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
> >Darklaf
> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
> >>
> >
> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>
> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>
> >
> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>
> I don't have that os :)
>
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
> >>
> >> How long should we calculate?
> >>
> >
> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
> >you
> >think ?
>
> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want to
> have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by the
> reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we should
> wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>
> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of testing.
> I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in the mean
> time I will try to test on windows, too.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> >
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Felix
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Thanks
> >> >
> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
> >> >>
> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> >> >> > Hi all,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
> >> >feedback on
> >> >> > the last release.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Regards
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Felix
> >> >> >
> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
> >> >regressions
> >> >> and
> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like
> >to
> >> >wait a
> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
> >> >though).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
> >> >introduced
> >> >> issues
> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix
> >> >those
> >> >> issues
> >> >> >>> which is great.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
> >(at
> >> >least
> >> >> the
> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
> >> >manual
> >> >> tests me
> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
> >> >Windows 10.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
> >> >customer,
> >> >> this is
> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
> >tests
> >> >for the
> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a
> >> >Windows
> >> >> OS.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would
> >be
> >> >a good
> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
> >opening
> >> >a test
> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
> >back
> >> >to
> >> >> System
> >> >> >>> LAFs.
> >> >> >> That is always possible.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Regards
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Felix
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Regards
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Thanks for confirmaton.
It was just to confirm your issue is related to this bug report :
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64984
We'll set this probably within LAF setup in upcoming bugfix version, unless
there is a fix in darklaf meanwhile
Regards
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:36 PM Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, this parameter work (I work on Windows)
>
> -Ddarklaf.treeRowPopup=false
>
> But remember that you can redefine your HEAP env in setenv.bat (It's my
> config for example), so HEAP from line number 151 in jmeter.bat is not used
> if someone have HEAP in setenv.bat (because of line 148). It's small
> comment if you plan to release this fix with darklaf.treeRowPopup
> parameter set to false in jmeter.bat
>
> Regards,
> Mariusz
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:06, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Mariusz,
>> Can you please do the following:
>>
>> 1) Find the line 151 of jmeter.bat:
>>
>> => set HEAP=-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m
>>
>> Replace current value by:
>>
>> => set HEAP=-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m -Ddarklaf.treeRowPopup=false
>>
>>
>> If Linux, Find the line 166 of jmeter.sh:
>>
>> Replace
>>
>> : "${HEAP:="-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m"}"
>>
>> by:
>>
>> : "${HEAP:="-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m -Ddarklaf.treeRowPopup=false"}"
>>
>> 3) Restart JMeter
>>
>> 4) test again
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:31 AM Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The same situation on r1942-53c6db8676b868db10d668e7ede2ef36cf8241b9
>>> I think that adding "critical section controller" started problem. I
>>> added setUP/tearDown TG, and Jsr223 controller earlier without problem.
>>> Critical section controller (logical controller) was first element of
>>> this kind I added to this plan in 5.4.1-Snapshot. It was added to Test
>>> Fragment.
>>>
>>> Mariusz
>>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 10:01, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not, yet.
>>>> After restarting JMeter the error persist - I can't also click on most
>>>> disabled elements eg. TestFragments and disabled TestGroups - I can click
>>>> in enabled elements in disabled elements.
>>>> After opening the same plan in JM 5.3 everything works, so I think that
>>>> jmx is not damaged.
>>>> I will try new build.
>>>>
>>>> Mariusz
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 09:40, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> Did you try with latest nightly build also ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:38 AM Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> When I added "Critical section controller" (Darklaf Intellij) - I am
>>>>>> not able to click on it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mariusz
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 16:37, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> I wil try to test my scripts from 5.3 to 5.4.1 snapshot on Windows
>>>>>>> next week - I downloaded LATEST
>>>>>>> (r1936-5bb4fbe389204290c61afbd12bac66a8ca928755) from
>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/
>>>>>>> I will have some feedback I think. Now, as fast run I started my
>>>>>>> script with jdbc samplers + changed UI to Darklaf few times - it
>>>>>>> workes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Mariusz
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 12:27, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> >> >Hello,
>>>>>>>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while
>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>> >on the
>>>>>>>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
>>>>>>>> >Darklaf
>>>>>>>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>>>>>>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>>>>>>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't have that os :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> How long should we calculate?
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what
>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>> >you
>>>>>>>> >think ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you
>>>>>>>> want to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by
>>>>>>>> the reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we
>>>>>>>> should wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of
>>>>>>>> testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in
>>>>>>>> the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Regards
>>>>>>>> >> Felix
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >Thanks
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>>>>>>> >> >> > Hi all,
>>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>>>>>>>> >> >feedback on
>>>>>>>> >> >> > the last release.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >> > Regards
>>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >> > Felix
>>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>>>>>>>> >> >regressions
>>>>>>>> >> >> and
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would
>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>> >to
>>>>>>>> >> >wait a
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>>>>>>>> >> >though).
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>>>>>>>> >> >introduced
>>>>>>>> >> >> issues
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive
>>>>>>>> to fix
>>>>>>>> >> >those
>>>>>>>> >> >> issues
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI
>>>>>>>> experience
>>>>>>>> >(at
>>>>>>>> >> >least
>>>>>>>> >> >> the
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> >> >manual
>>>>>>>> >> >> tests me
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> >> >Windows 10.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>>>>>>>> >> >customer,
>>>>>>>> >> >> this is
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
>>>>>>>> >tests
>>>>>>>> >> >for the
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans
>>>>>>>> on a
>>>>>>>> >> >Windows
>>>>>>>> >> >> OS.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> >be
>>>>>>>> >> >a good
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
>>>>>>>> >opening
>>>>>>>> >> >a test
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
>>>>>>>> >back
>>>>>>>> >> >to
>>>>>>>> >> >> System
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> Regards
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >> Felix
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> Regards
>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com>.
Yes, this parameter work (I work on Windows)
-Ddarklaf.treeRowPopup=false
But remember that you can redefine your HEAP env in setenv.bat (It's my
config for example), so HEAP from line number 151 in jmeter.bat is not used
if someone have HEAP in setenv.bat (because of line 148). It's small
comment if you plan to release this fix with darklaf.treeRowPopup
parameter set to false in jmeter.bat
Regards,
Mariusz
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:06, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Mariusz,
> Can you please do the following:
>
> 1) Find the line 151 of jmeter.bat:
>
> => set HEAP=-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m
>
> Replace current value by:
>
> => set HEAP=-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m -Ddarklaf.treeRowPopup=false
>
>
> If Linux, Find the line 166 of jmeter.sh:
>
> Replace
>
> : "${HEAP:="-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m"}"
>
> by:
>
> : "${HEAP:="-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m -Ddarklaf.treeRowPopup=false"}"
>
> 3) Restart JMeter
>
> 4) test again
>
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:31 AM Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The same situation on r1942-53c6db8676b868db10d668e7ede2ef36cf8241b9
>> I think that adding "critical section controller" started problem. I
>> added setUP/tearDown TG, and Jsr223 controller earlier without problem.
>> Critical section controller (logical controller) was first element of
>> this kind I added to this plan in 5.4.1-Snapshot. It was added to Test
>> Fragment.
>>
>> Mariusz
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 10:01, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Not, yet.
>>> After restarting JMeter the error persist - I can't also click on most
>>> disabled elements eg. TestFragments and disabled TestGroups - I can click
>>> in enabled elements in disabled elements.
>>> After opening the same plan in JM 5.3 everything works, so I think that
>>> jmx is not damaged.
>>> I will try new build.
>>>
>>> Mariusz
>>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 09:40, Philippe Mouawad <
>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> Did you try with latest nightly build also ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:38 AM Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> When I added "Critical section controller" (Darklaf Intellij) - I am
>>>>> not able to click on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mariusz
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 16:37, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> I wil try to test my scripts from 5.3 to 5.4.1 snapshot on Windows
>>>>>> next week - I downloaded LATEST
>>>>>> (r1936-5bb4fbe389204290c61afbd12bac66a8ca928755) from
>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/
>>>>>> I will have some feedback I think. Now, as fast run I started my
>>>>>> script with jdbc samplers + changed UI to Darklaf few times - it
>>>>>> workes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Mariusz
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 12:27, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> >> >Hello,
>>>>>>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while
>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>> >on the
>>>>>>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
>>>>>>> >Darklaf
>>>>>>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>>>>>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>>>>>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't have that os :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> How long should we calculate?
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
>>>>>>> >you
>>>>>>> >think ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want
>>>>>>> to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by the
>>>>>>> reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we should
>>>>>>> wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of
>>>>>>> testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in
>>>>>>> the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Regards
>>>>>>> >> Felix
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >Thanks
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> > Hi all,
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>>>>>>> >> >feedback on
>>>>>>> >> >> > the last release.
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > Regards
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > Felix
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>>>>>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>>>>>>> >> >regressions
>>>>>>> >> >> and
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>>>>>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>> >to
>>>>>>> >> >wait a
>>>>>>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>>>>>>> >> >though).
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>>>>>>> >> >introduced
>>>>>>> >> >> issues
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to
>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>> >> >those
>>>>>>> >> >> issues
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
>>>>>>> >(at
>>>>>>> >> >least
>>>>>>> >> >> the
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
>>>>>>> >> >manual
>>>>>>> >> >> tests me
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
>>>>>>> >> >Windows 10.
>>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>>>>>>> >> >customer,
>>>>>>> >> >> this is
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>>>>>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
>>>>>>> >tests
>>>>>>> >> >for the
>>>>>>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans
>>>>>>> on a
>>>>>>> >> >Windows
>>>>>>> >> >> OS.
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> >be
>>>>>>> >> >a good
>>>>>>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
>>>>>>> >opening
>>>>>>> >> >a test
>>>>>>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>>>>>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
>>>>>>> >back
>>>>>>> >> >to
>>>>>>> >> >> System
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>>>>>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >> Regards
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >> Felix
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >>> Regards
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello Mariusz,
Can you please do the following:
1) Find the line 151 of jmeter.bat:
=> set HEAP=-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m
Replace current value by:
=> set HEAP=-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m -Ddarklaf.treeRowPopup=false
If Linux, Find the line 166 of jmeter.sh:
Replace
: "${HEAP:="-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m"}"
by:
: "${HEAP:="-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m
-Ddarklaf.treeRowPopup=false"}"
3) Restart JMeter
4) test again
Thanks
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:31 AM Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The same situation on r1942-53c6db8676b868db10d668e7ede2ef36cf8241b9
> I think that adding "critical section controller" started problem. I added
> setUP/tearDown TG, and Jsr223 controller earlier without problem.
> Critical section controller (logical controller) was first element of this
> kind I added to this plan in 5.4.1-Snapshot. It was added to Test Fragment.
>
> Mariusz
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 10:01, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Not, yet.
>> After restarting JMeter the error persist - I can't also click on most
>> disabled elements eg. TestFragments and disabled TestGroups - I can click
>> in enabled elements in disabled elements.
>> After opening the same plan in JM 5.3 everything works, so I think that
>> jmx is not damaged.
>> I will try new build.
>>
>> Mariusz
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 09:40, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Did you try with latest nightly build also ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:38 AM Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> When I added "Critical section controller" (Darklaf Intellij) - I am
>>>> not able to click on it.
>>>>
>>>> Mariusz
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 16:37, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I wil try to test my scripts from 5.3 to 5.4.1 snapshot on Windows
>>>>> next week - I downloaded LATEST
>>>>> (r1936-5bb4fbe389204290c61afbd12bac66a8ca928755) from
>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/
>>>>> I will have some feedback I think. Now, as fast run I started my
>>>>> script with jdbc samplers + changed UI to Darklaf few times - it
>>>>> workes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Mariusz
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 12:27, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> >> >Hello,
>>>>>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
>>>>>> >on the
>>>>>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
>>>>>> >Darklaf
>>>>>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>>>>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>>>>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have that os :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> How long should we calculate?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
>>>>>> >you
>>>>>> >think ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want
>>>>>> to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by the
>>>>>> reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we should
>>>>>> wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of
>>>>>> testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in
>>>>>> the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Regards
>>>>>> >> Felix
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >Thanks
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> > Hi all,
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>>>>>> >> >feedback on
>>>>>> >> >> > the last release.
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > Regards
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > Felix
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>>>>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>>>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>>>>>> >> >regressions
>>>>>> >> >> and
>>>>>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>>>>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would
>>>>>> like
>>>>>> >to
>>>>>> >> >wait a
>>>>>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>>>>>> >> >though).
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>>>>>> >> >introduced
>>>>>> >> >> issues
>>>>>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to
>>>>>> fix
>>>>>> >> >those
>>>>>> >> >> issues
>>>>>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
>>>>>> >(at
>>>>>> >> >least
>>>>>> >> >> the
>>>>>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
>>>>>> >> >manual
>>>>>> >> >> tests me
>>>>>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>>>>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
>>>>>> >> >Windows 10.
>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>>>>>> >> >customer,
>>>>>> >> >> this is
>>>>>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>>>>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
>>>>>> >tests
>>>>>> >> >for the
>>>>>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans
>>>>>> on a
>>>>>> >> >Windows
>>>>>> >> >> OS.
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> >be
>>>>>> >> >a good
>>>>>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
>>>>>> >opening
>>>>>> >> >a test
>>>>>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>>>>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
>>>>>> >back
>>>>>> >> >to
>>>>>> >> >> System
>>>>>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>>>>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> Regards
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> Felix
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> Regards
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com>.
The same situation on r1942-53c6db8676b868db10d668e7ede2ef36cf8241b9
I think that adding "critical section controller" started problem. I added
setUP/tearDown TG, and Jsr223 controller earlier without problem.
Critical section controller (logical controller) was first element of this
kind I added to this plan in 5.4.1-Snapshot. It was added to Test Fragment.
Mariusz
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 10:01, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not, yet.
> After restarting JMeter the error persist - I can't also click on most
> disabled elements eg. TestFragments and disabled TestGroups - I can click
> in enabled elements in disabled elements.
> After opening the same plan in JM 5.3 everything works, so I think that
> jmx is not damaged.
> I will try new build.
>
> Mariusz
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 09:40, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Did you try with latest nightly build also ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:38 AM Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> When I added "Critical section controller" (Darklaf Intellij) - I am
>>> not able to click on it.
>>>
>>> Mariusz
>>>
>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 16:37, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I wil try to test my scripts from 5.3 to 5.4.1 snapshot on Windows next
>>>> week - I downloaded LATEST
>>>> (r1936-5bb4fbe389204290c61afbd12bac66a8ca928755) from
>>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/
>>>> I will have some feedback I think. Now, as fast run I started my script
>>>> with jdbc samplers + changed UI to Darklaf few times - it workes.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mariusz
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 12:27, Felix Schumacher <
>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>>>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>>>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>>>> >> >Hello,
>>>>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
>>>>> >on the
>>>>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
>>>>> >Darklaf
>>>>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>>>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>>>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have that os :)
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> How long should we calculate?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
>>>>> >you
>>>>> >think ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want
>>>>> to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by the
>>>>> reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we should
>>>>> wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>>>>>
>>>>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of
>>>>> testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in
>>>>> the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Felix
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Regards
>>>>> >> Felix
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >Thanks
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>>>> >> >> > Hi all,
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>>>>> >> >feedback on
>>>>> >> >> > the last release.
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> > Regards
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> > Felix
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>>>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>>>>> >> >regressions
>>>>> >> >> and
>>>>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>>>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like
>>>>> >to
>>>>> >> >wait a
>>>>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>>>>> >> >though).
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>>>>> >> >introduced
>>>>> >> >> issues
>>>>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to
>>>>> fix
>>>>> >> >those
>>>>> >> >> issues
>>>>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
>>>>> >(at
>>>>> >> >least
>>>>> >> >> the
>>>>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
>>>>> >> >manual
>>>>> >> >> tests me
>>>>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>>>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
>>>>> >> >Windows 10.
>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>>>>> >> >customer,
>>>>> >> >> this is
>>>>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>>>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
>>>>> >tests
>>>>> >> >for the
>>>>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on
>>>>> a
>>>>> >> >Windows
>>>>> >> >> OS.
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would
>>>>> >be
>>>>> >> >a good
>>>>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
>>>>> >opening
>>>>> >> >a test
>>>>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>>>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
>>>>> >back
>>>>> >> >to
>>>>> >> >> System
>>>>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>>>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >> Regards
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >> Felix
>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> >>> Regards
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com>.
Not, yet.
After restarting JMeter the error persist - I can't also click on most
disabled elements eg. TestFragments and disabled TestGroups - I can click
in enabled elements in disabled elements.
After opening the same plan in JM 5.3 everything works, so I think that jmx
is not damaged.
I will try new build.
Mariusz
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 09:40, Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
> Did you try with latest nightly build also ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:38 AM Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> When I added "Critical section controller" (Darklaf Intellij) - I am not
>> able to click on it.
>>
>> Mariusz
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 16:37, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I wil try to test my scripts from 5.3 to 5.4.1 snapshot on Windows next
>>> week - I downloaded LATEST
>>> (r1936-5bb4fbe389204290c61afbd12bac66a8ca928755) from
>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/
>>> I will have some feedback I think. Now, as fast run I started my script
>>> with jdbc samplers + changed UI to Darklaf few times - it workes.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mariusz
>>>
>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 12:27, Felix Schumacher <
>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>>> >> >Hello,
>>>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
>>>> >on the
>>>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
>>>> >Darklaf
>>>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>>>>
>>>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>>>
>>>> I don't have that os :)
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> How long should we calculate?
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
>>>> >you
>>>> >think ?
>>>>
>>>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want to
>>>> have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by the
>>>> reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we should
>>>> wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>>>>
>>>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of
>>>> testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in
>>>> the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Regards
>>>> >> Felix
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >Thanks
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>>>> >wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>>> >> >> > Hi all,
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>>>> >> >feedback on
>>>> >> >> > the last release.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Regards
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Felix
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>>>> >> >regressions
>>>> >> >> and
>>>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like
>>>> >to
>>>> >> >wait a
>>>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>>>> >> >though).
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>>>> >> >introduced
>>>> >> >> issues
>>>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix
>>>> >> >those
>>>> >> >> issues
>>>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
>>>> >(at
>>>> >> >least
>>>> >> >> the
>>>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
>>>> >> >manual
>>>> >> >> tests me
>>>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
>>>> >> >Windows 10.
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>>>> >> >customer,
>>>> >> >> this is
>>>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
>>>> >tests
>>>> >> >for the
>>>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a
>>>> >> >Windows
>>>> >> >> OS.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would
>>>> >be
>>>> >> >a good
>>>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
>>>> >opening
>>>> >> >a test
>>>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
>>>> >back
>>>> >> >to
>>>> >> >> System
>>>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Regards
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Felix
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> Regards
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Did you try with latest nightly build also ?
Thanks
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:38 AM Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> When I added "Critical section controller" (Darklaf Intellij) - I am not
> able to click on it.
>
> Mariusz
>
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 16:37, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I wil try to test my scripts from 5.3 to 5.4.1 snapshot on Windows next
>> week - I downloaded LATEST
>> (r1936-5bb4fbe389204290c61afbd12bac66a8ca928755) from
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/
>> I will have some feedback I think. Now, as fast run I started my script
>> with jdbc samplers + changed UI to Darklaf few times - it workes.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mariusz
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 12:27, Felix Schumacher <
>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>> >> >Hello,
>>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>>> >>
>>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>> >>
>>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
>>> >on the
>>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
>>> >Darklaf
>>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>>>
>>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>>
>>> I don't have that os :)
>>>
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>> >>
>>> >> How long should we calculate?
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
>>> >you
>>> >think ?
>>>
>>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want to
>>> have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by the
>>> reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we should
>>> wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>>>
>>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of
>>> testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in
>>> the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Felix
>>>
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> Felix
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Thanks
>>> >> >
>>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>> >> >> > Hi all,
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>>> >> >feedback on
>>> >> >> > the last release.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Regards
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Felix
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>>> >> >regressions
>>> >> >> and
>>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like
>>> >to
>>> >> >wait a
>>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>>> >> >though).
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>>> >> >introduced
>>> >> >> issues
>>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix
>>> >> >those
>>> >> >> issues
>>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
>>> >(at
>>> >> >least
>>> >> >> the
>>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
>>> >> >manual
>>> >> >> tests me
>>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
>>> >> >Windows 10.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>>> >> >customer,
>>> >> >> this is
>>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
>>> >tests
>>> >> >for the
>>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a
>>> >> >Windows
>>> >> >> OS.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would
>>> >be
>>> >> >a good
>>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
>>> >opening
>>> >> >a test
>>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
>>> >back
>>> >> >to
>>> >> >> System
>>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Regards
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Felix
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>> Regards
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
When I added "Critical section controller" (Darklaf Intellij) - I am not
able to click on it.
Mariusz
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 16:37, Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I wil try to test my scripts from 5.3 to 5.4.1 snapshot on Windows next
> week - I downloaded LATEST
> (r1936-5bb4fbe389204290c61afbd12bac66a8ca928755) from
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/
> I will have some feedback I think. Now, as fast run I started my script
> with jdbc samplers + changed UI to Darklaf few times - it workes.
>
> Regards,
> Mariusz
>
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 12:27, Felix Schumacher <
> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>> >> >Hello,
>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>> >>
>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>> >>
>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
>> >on the
>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
>> >Darklaf
>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>>
>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>
>> >
>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>
>> I don't have that os :)
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>> >>
>> >> How long should we calculate?
>> >>
>> >
>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
>> >you
>> >think ?
>>
>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want to
>> have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by the
>> reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we should
>> wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>>
>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of
>> testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in
>> the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Felix
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>> >> >feedback on
>> >> >> > the last release.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Regards
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Felix
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>> >> >regressions
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like
>> >to
>> >> >wait a
>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>> >> >though).
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>> >> >introduced
>> >> >> issues
>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix
>> >> >those
>> >> >> issues
>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
>> >(at
>> >> >least
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
>> >> >manual
>> >> >> tests me
>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
>> >> >Windows 10.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>> >> >customer,
>> >> >> this is
>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
>> >tests
>> >> >for the
>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a
>> >> >Windows
>> >> >> OS.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would
>> >be
>> >> >a good
>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
>> >opening
>> >> >a test
>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
>> >back
>> >> >to
>> >> >> System
>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Felix
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Regards
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Mariusz W <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I wil try to test my scripts from 5.3 to 5.4.1 snapshot on Windows next
week - I downloaded LATEST
(r1936-5bb4fbe389204290c61afbd12bac66a8ca928755) from
https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/
I will have some feedback I think. Now, as fast run I started my script
with jdbc samplers + changed UI to Darklaf few times - it workes.
Regards,
Mariusz
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 12:27, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
> >> >Hello,
> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
> >>
> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
> >>
> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
> >on the
> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
> >Darklaf
> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
> >>
> >
> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>
> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>
> >
> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>
> I don't have that os :)
>
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
> >>
> >> How long should we calculate?
> >>
> >
> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
> >you
> >think ?
>
> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want to
> have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by the
> reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we should
> wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>
> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of testing.
> I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in the mean
> time I will try to test on windows, too.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> >
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Felix
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Thanks
> >> >
> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
> >> >>
> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> >> >> > Hi all,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
> >> >feedback on
> >> >> > the last release.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Regards
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Felix
> >> >> >
> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
> >> >regressions
> >> >> and
> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like
> >to
> >> >wait a
> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
> >> >though).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
> >> >introduced
> >> >> issues
> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix
> >> >those
> >> >> issues
> >> >> >>> which is great.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
> >(at
> >> >least
> >> >> the
> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
> >> >manual
> >> >> tests me
> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
> >> >Windows 10.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
> >> >customer,
> >> >> this is
> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
> >tests
> >> >for the
> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a
> >> >Windows
> >> >> OS.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would
> >be
> >> >a good
> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
> >opening
> >> >a test
> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
> >back
> >> >to
> >> >> System
> >> >> >>> LAFs.
> >> >> >> That is always possible.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Regards
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Felix
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Regards
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
>On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>> >Hello,
>> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>>
>> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>
>> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
>on the
>> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
>Darklaf
>> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>
>
>Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>
>I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
I don't have that os :)
>
>>
>> >
>> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>
>> How long should we calculate?
>>
>
>Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
>you
>think ?
I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by the reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we should wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
Regards
Felix
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>>
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >
>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org>
>wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>> >>
>> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>> >feedback on
>> >> > the last release.
>> >> >
>> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards
>> >> >
>> >> > Felix
>> >> >
>> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>> >> >
>> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>> >> >>> Hello,
>> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>> >regressions
>> >> and
>> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like
>to
>> >wait a
>> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>> >though).
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>> >introduced
>> >> issues
>> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix
>> >those
>> >> issues
>> >> >>> which is great.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
>(at
>> >least
>> >> the
>> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
>> >manual
>> >> tests me
>> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
>> >Windows 10.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>> >customer,
>> >> this is
>> >> >>> how I reported them.
>> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
>tests
>> >for the
>> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a
>> >Windows
>> >> OS.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would
>be
>> >a good
>> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
>opening
>> >a test
>> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
>back
>> >to
>> >> System
>> >> >>> LAFs.
>> >> >> That is always possible.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Felix
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Regards
>> >>
>> >>
>>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
> >Hello,
> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>
> Which level do you want to achieve?
>
> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working on the
> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with Darklaf
> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>
Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
This is where I saw most of the bugs.
I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>
> >
> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>
> How long should we calculate?
>
Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do you
think ?
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
> >>
> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
> >feedback on
> >> > the last release.
> >> >
> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> > Felix
> >> >
> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
> >> >
> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
> >regressions
> >> and
> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like to
> >wait a
> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
> >though).
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
> >introduced
> >> issues
> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix
> >those
> >> issues
> >> >>> which is great.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience (at
> >least
> >> the
> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
> >manual
> >> tests me
> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
> >Windows 10.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
> >customer,
> >> this is
> >> >>> how I reported them.
> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated tests
> >for the
> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a
> >Windows
> >> OS.
> >> >>
> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would be
> >a good
> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like opening
> >a test
> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
> >> >>
> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch back
> >to
> >> System
> >> >>> LAFs.
> >> >> That is always possible.
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards
> >> >>
> >> >> Felix
> >> >>
> >> >>> Regards
> >>
> >>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
>Hello,
>What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
Which level do you want to achieve?
I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working on the recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with Darklaf (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>
>Looks a bit too early for me.
How long should we calculate?
Regards
Felix
>
>Thanks
>
>On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>
>> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>feedback on
>> > the last release.
>> >
>> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Felix
>> >
>> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>> >
>> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>regressions
>> and
>> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like to
>wait a
>> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>though).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>introduced
>> issues
>> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix
>those
>> issues
>> >>> which is great.
>> >>>
>> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience (at
>least
>> the
>> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>> >>>
>> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
>manual
>> tests me
>> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
>Windows 10.
>> >>>
>> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>customer,
>> this is
>> >>> how I reported them.
>> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated tests
>for the
>> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a
>Windows
>> OS.
>> >>
>> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would be
>a good
>> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like opening
>a test
>> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>> >>
>> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch back
>to
>> System
>> >>> LAFs.
>> >> That is always possible.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >>
>> >> Felix
>> >>
>> >>> Regards
>>
>>
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
Looks a bit too early for me.
Thanks
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>
> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for feedback on
> > the last release.
> >
> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Felix
> >
> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
> >
> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some regressions
> and
> >>> issues with Darklaf.
> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like to wait a
> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks, though).
> >>
> >>
> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was introduced
> issues
> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix those
> issues
> >>> which is great.
> >>>
> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience (at least
> the
> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
> >>>
> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the manual
> tests me
> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on Windows 10.
> >>>
> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one customer,
> this is
> >>> how I reported them.
> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated tests for the
> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a Windows
> OS.
> >>
> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would be a good
> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like opening a test
> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
> >>
> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
> >>
> >>
> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch back to
> System
> >>> LAFs.
> >> That is always possible.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Felix
> >>
> >>> Regards
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Milamber <mi...@apache.org>.
I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for feedback on
> the last release.
>
> Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>
> Regards
>
> Felix
>
> PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>
> Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>> Hello,
>>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some regressions and
>>> issues with Darklaf.
>> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like to wait a
>> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks, though).
>>
>>
>>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was introduced issues
>>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix those issues
>>> which is great.
>>>
>>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience (at least the
>>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>>>
>>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the manual tests me
>>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on Windows 10.
>>>
>>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one customer, this is
>>> how I reported them.
>> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated tests for the
>> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a Windows OS.
>>
>> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would be a good
>> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like opening a test
>> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>
>>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>
>>
>>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch back to System
>>> LAFs.
>> That is always possible.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>> Regards
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Hi all,
I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for feedback on
the last release.
Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
Regards
Felix
PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>> Hello,
>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some regressions and
>> issues with Darklaf.
> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like to wait a
> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks, though).
>
>
>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was introduced issues
>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix those issues
>> which is great.
>>
>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience (at least the
>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>>
>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the manual tests me
>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on Windows 10.
>>
>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one customer, this is
>> how I reported them.
> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated tests for the
> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a Windows OS.
>
> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would be a good
> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like opening a test
> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>
>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>
>
>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch back to System
>> LAFs.
> That is always possible.
>
> Regards
>
> Felix
>
>> Regards
Re: Release 5.4.1
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hello,
> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some regressions and
> issues with Darklaf.
Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would like to wait a
few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks, though).
>
> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was introduced issues
> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to fix those issues
> which is great.
>
> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience (at least the
> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>
> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the manual tests me
> wake as part of our release process neither.
> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on Windows 10.
>
> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one customer, this is
> how I reported them.
That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated tests for the
GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans on a Windows OS.
@All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What would be a good
way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like opening a test
plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>
> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
Linux (Ubuntu really)
>
> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch back to System
> LAFs.
That is always possible.
Regards
Felix
>
> Regards