You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@oodt.apache.org by "Imesha Sudasingha (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/02 08:10:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OODT-693) Consolidate logging in OODT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16498932#comment-16498932 ] 

Imesha Sudasingha edited comment on OODT-693 at 6/2/18 8:09 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

I think this issue is not resolved yet because we are still using JUL and SLF4J both.

IMO, all OODT logs should go through one framework. As [~lewismc] suggested, me too prefer SLF4J since it supports multiple underlying implementations which can be altered according to our preferences. Furthermore, in `java.util.logging`, we have to do string concatenation ourselves, which is tiresome and makes the code ugly.

So, I think this should be done in near future. At least as a future GSoC project as [~chrismattmann] mentioned. By having proper logging, OODT will be easier to debug. 


was (Author: imesha):
IMO, all OODT logs should go through one framework. As [~lewismc] suggested, me too prefer SLF4J since it supports multiple underlying implementations which can be altered according to our preferences. Furthermore, in `java.util.logging`, we have to do string concatenation ourselves, which is tiresome and makes the code ugly.

So, I think this should be done in near future. At least as a future GSoC project as [~chrismattmann] mentioned. By having proper logging, OODT will be easier to debug. 

> Consolidate logging in OODT
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: OODT-693
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-693
>             Project: OODT
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: file manager
>    Affects Versions: 0.6
>            Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.1
>
>
> Right now we seem to be using an array of inconsistent logging frameworks.
> Personally I really like the Slf4j over Log4j setup. Extremely easy to work with, easy to configure and Log4j 2.X is dynamite so if we can implement that then we are laughing.
> This is by no means a trivial task. 
> It is however an important one.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)