[VOTE] [RESULT] Apache OFBiz 10.04.02

[Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@hotwaxmedia.com>]

Thanks to the voters, this vote has passed with the following results:

[+1] 11: Ashish, Pierre Smits, Deepak Dixit, Jacques, Ankit Jain, Chandan Khandelwal, Tim Ruppert, Vikas Mayur, Dhirai, Hongs, Erwan
[-1] 0

The minimum (3) number of +1 votes from PMC members has been reached: 4 votes from Ashish, Jacques, Erwan, Jacopo

I will proceed with the remaining steps required to release the package.

Jacopo

On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02" (major release number: "10.04"; minor release number: "02"), will supersede the release "Apache OFBiz 10.04" (aka 10.04.01).
> 
> The release files can be downloaded from here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
> 
> (committers only?) or from here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/
> 
> (everyone else)
> 
> and are:
> 
> * apache-ofbiz-10.04.02.zip: the release package, based on the 10.04 branch at revision 1324645 (latest as of now)
> * KEYS: text file with keys
> * apache-ofbiz-10.04.02.zip.asc: the detached signature file
> * apache-ofbiz-10.04.02.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-10.04.02.zip.sha: hashes
> 
> Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for instructions on testing the signatures see http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html).
> 
> Vote:
> 
> [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 10.04.02
> [ -1] do not release
> 
> This vote will be closed in 72 hours.
> For more details about this process please read http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> 
> The following text is quoted from the above url:
> "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be vetoed. Generally the community will cancel the release vote if anyone identifies serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate decision, lies with the individual serving as release manager."
> 
> Kind Regards,
> 
> Jacopo