You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@zeppelin.apache.org by Charles Givre <cg...@gmail.com> on 2015/11/20 19:33:53 UTC

JDBC Question

Sorry, One more question.  I’m of the opinion that Zeppelin could really benefit from generic JDBC/ODBC interpreters.  If the interpreter for PostgreSQL is actually a generic JDBC interpreter, wouldn’t it be better to label it as such and provide instructions as to how to connect to common databases?  i think it would get a lot more traction that way.  Just my .02.
Thanks,
— C

Re: JDBC Question

Posted by moon soo Lee <mo...@apache.org>.

I totally agree. Community made multiple trial of having generic JDBC
interpreter. I think community is definitely going to that direction.

There were attempt like
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/211 and latest trial is
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/455.

Any feedback for these works would be really appreciated. Thanks for the
suggestion.

Best,
moon

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:33 AM Charles Givre <cg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, One more question.  I’m of the opinion that Zeppelin could really
> benefit from generic JDBC/ODBC interpreters.  If the interpreter for
> PostgreSQL is actually a generic JDBC interpreter, wouldn’t it be better to
> label it as such and provide instructions as to how to connect to common
> databases?  i think it would get a lot more traction that way.  Just my .02.
> Thanks,
> — C