You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl> on 2010/08/02 12:22:26 UTC
RE: svn commit: r981479 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philip@apache.org [mailto:philip@apache.org]
> Sent: maandag 2 augustus 2010 14:19
> To: commits@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r981479 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
>
> Author: philip
> Date: Mon Aug 2 12:19:12 2010
> New Revision: 981479
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981479&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
> (svn_wc__internal_ensure_adm): Scan if the repository information is
> not
> immediately available.
>
> Suggested by: rhuijben
>
> Modified:
> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
>
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_
> files.c?rev=981479&r1=981478&r2=981479&view=diff
> =======================================================================
> =======
> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c (original)
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c Mon Aug 2
> 12:19:12 2010
> @@ -648,6 +648,24 @@ svn_wc__internal_ensure_adm(svn_wc__db_t
> "revision %ld in '%s'"),
> revision, db_revision, local_abspath);
>
> + if (!db_repos_root_url)
> + {
> + if (status == svn_wc__db_status_added)
> + SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_scan_addition(NULL, NULL,
> + &db_repos_relpath,
> + &db_repos_root_url,
> + &db_repos_uuid,
> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> + db, local_abspath,
> + scratch_pool,
> scratch_pool));
> + else
> + SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_scan_base_repos(&db_repos_relpath,
> + &db_repos_root_url,
> + &db_repos_uuid,
> + db, local_abspath,
> + scratch_pool,
> scratch_pool));
What about a deleted child of a copy operation?
That is why I suggested that || !have_base on the first case. (I'm not 100% sure if that is enough to handle all 4th tree cases though as BASE_NODE might be switched below the delete)
Bert
Re: svn commit: r981479 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
Posted by Philip Martin <ph...@wandisco.com>.
"Bert Huijben" <be...@qqmail.nl> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: philip@apache.org [mailto:philip@apache.org]
>> Sent: maandag 2 augustus 2010 14:19
>> To: commits@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r981479 -
>> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
>>
>> Author: philip
>> Date: Mon Aug 2 12:19:12 2010
>> New Revision: 981479
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981479&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
>> (svn_wc__internal_ensure_adm): Scan if the repository information is
>> not
>> immediately available.
>>
>> Suggested by: rhuijben
>>
>> Modified:
>> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
>>
>> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_
>> files.c?rev=981479&r1=981478&r2=981479&view=diff
>> =======================================================================
>> =======
>> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c (original)
>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c Mon Aug 2
>> 12:19:12 2010
>> @@ -648,6 +648,24 @@ svn_wc__internal_ensure_adm(svn_wc__db_t
>> "revision %ld in '%s'"),
>> revision, db_revision, local_abspath);
>>
>> + if (!db_repos_root_url)
>> + {
>> + if (status == svn_wc__db_status_added)
>> + SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_scan_addition(NULL, NULL,
>> + &db_repos_relpath,
>> + &db_repos_root_url,
>> + &db_repos_uuid,
>> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>> + db, local_abspath,
>> + scratch_pool,
>> scratch_pool));
>> + else
>> + SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_scan_base_repos(&db_repos_relpath,
>> + &db_repos_root_url,
>> + &db_repos_uuid,
>> + db, local_abspath,
>> + scratch_pool,
>> scratch_pool));
>
>
> What about a deleted child of a copy operation?
The function simply returns if the node is deleted. I recently mae it
return if the node is not-present as well.
--
Philip
Re: svn commit: r981479 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
Posted by Philip Martin <ph...@wandisco.com>.
"Bert Huijben" <be...@qqmail.nl> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: philip@apache.org [mailto:philip@apache.org]
>> Sent: maandag 2 augustus 2010 14:19
>> To: commits@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r981479 -
>> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
>>
>> Author: philip
>> Date: Mon Aug 2 12:19:12 2010
>> New Revision: 981479
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981479&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
>> (svn_wc__internal_ensure_adm): Scan if the repository information is
>> not
>> immediately available.
>>
>> Suggested by: rhuijben
>>
>> Modified:
>> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
>>
>> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_
>> files.c?rev=981479&r1=981478&r2=981479&view=diff
>> =======================================================================
>> =======
>> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c (original)
>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_files.c Mon Aug 2
>> 12:19:12 2010
>> @@ -648,6 +648,24 @@ svn_wc__internal_ensure_adm(svn_wc__db_t
>> "revision %ld in '%s'"),
>> revision, db_revision, local_abspath);
>>
>> + if (!db_repos_root_url)
>> + {
>> + if (status == svn_wc__db_status_added)
>> + SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_scan_addition(NULL, NULL,
>> + &db_repos_relpath,
>> + &db_repos_root_url,
>> + &db_repos_uuid,
>> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>> + db, local_abspath,
>> + scratch_pool,
>> scratch_pool));
>> + else
>> + SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_scan_base_repos(&db_repos_relpath,
>> + &db_repos_root_url,
>> + &db_repos_uuid,
>> + db, local_abspath,
>> + scratch_pool,
>> scratch_pool));
>
>
> What about a deleted child of a copy operation?
The function simply returns if the node is deleted. I recently mae it
return if the node is not-present as well.
--
Philip