You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@archiva.apache.org by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> on 2006/09/30 08:04:41 UTC
jspf problem
I can replicate Daniel's problem with jspf files not being
interpreted. Using a basic tomcat install.
Looking at the source, I see three types of jspf includes. The first
are '<%@ include's, the second are '<c:import's and the last are
xwork-security <result> tags. No idea as to which would be bad, but
thought I'd bring it up.
Hen
Re: jspf problem
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
It's some separate snapshots.
On 30/09/2006, at 5:29 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> svn update
> At revision 451558.
>
> svn info
> URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/trunk
>
> On 9/30/06, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Still? I think you have old security libraries.
>>
>> jspf should only ever be used with <%@include %>
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> On 30/09/2006, at 4:04 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> > I can replicate Daniel's problem with jspf files not being
>> > interpreted. Using a basic tomcat install.
>> >
>> > Looking at the source, I see three types of jspf includes. The
>> first
>> > are '<%@ include's, the second are '<c:import's and the last are
>> > xwork-security <result> tags. No idea as to which would be bad, but
>> > thought I'd bring it up.
>> >
>> > Hen
>>
Re: jspf problem
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
svn update
At revision 451558.
svn info
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/trunk
On 9/30/06, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Still? I think you have old security libraries.
>
> jspf should only ever be used with <%@include %>
>
> - Brett
>
> On 30/09/2006, at 4:04 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > I can replicate Daniel's problem with jspf files not being
> > interpreted. Using a basic tomcat install.
> >
> > Looking at the source, I see three types of jspf includes. The first
> > are '<%@ include's, the second are '<c:import's and the last are
> > xwork-security <result> tags. No idea as to which would be bad, but
> > thought I'd bring it up.
> >
> > Hen
>
Re: jspf problem
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Still? I think you have old security libraries.
jspf should only ever be used with <%@include %>
- Brett
On 30/09/2006, at 4:04 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I can replicate Daniel's problem with jspf files not being
> interpreted. Using a basic tomcat install.
>
> Looking at the source, I see three types of jspf includes. The first
> are '<%@ include's, the second are '<c:import's and the last are
> xwork-security <result> tags. No idea as to which would be bad, but
> thought I'd bring it up.
>
> Hen