You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Jonathan Gray (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/07/19 19:22:02 UTC

[jira] Commented: (HBASE-2847) Put added after a delete is overshadowed if its timestamp is older than than that of the tombstone

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12889924#action_12889924 ] 

Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-2847:
--------------------------------------

This is probably the hardest behavior to change because it requires looking at the type, not just the timestamp / memstore stamp / storefile order.

I think we should fix multiple version issues first, for puts, and then consider this.

> Put added after a delete is overshadowed if its timestamp is older than than that of the tombstone
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2847
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2847
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>             Fix For: 0.90.0
>
>
> If we delete a row and then at a later time add to the row a cell that has a timestamp that is older than the delete, the addition will not be seen; the tombstone will prevent the newer addition being returned.
> IMO, this is non-intuitive.  We should fix.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.