You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Jonathan Gray (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/07/19 19:22:02 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HBASE-2847) Put added after a delete is
overshadowed if its timestamp is older than than that of the tombstone
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12889924#action_12889924 ]
Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-2847:
--------------------------------------
This is probably the hardest behavior to change because it requires looking at the type, not just the timestamp / memstore stamp / storefile order.
I think we should fix multiple version issues first, for puts, and then consider this.
> Put added after a delete is overshadowed if its timestamp is older than than that of the tombstone
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-2847
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2847
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: stack
> Fix For: 0.90.0
>
>
> If we delete a row and then at a later time add to the row a cell that has a timestamp that is older than the delete, the addition will not be seen; the tombstone will prevent the newer addition being returned.
> IMO, this is non-intuitive. We should fix.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.