You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@servicecomb.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/01/27 08:07:56 UTC

[GitHub] [servicecomb-pack] zhfeng commented on issue #692: 对pack的几点述求

zhfeng commented on issue #692:
URL: https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-pack/issues/692#issuecomment-768111437


   Thanks @kelly-ye to bring these suggestions. It could be better if you can describe them in English and I think it could be much helpful for more people.
   
   1. I agree  that we need to consider getting out of the spring-boot framework and might provide the core capabilities building on the different runtime vendors, such as the spring, spring-boot or CDI (maybe others). So I think this could be very useful to extend Saga in the different runtime environments. And yeah, this is really a big refactoring on the current codes. I'd like to create a new experimental branch for these changes and see more feedbacks from the community.
   2. It's a good idea to priovde the SPI for these components.
   3. I think we have some discuss about the async invoking of Saga before


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org