You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by "Pinaki Poddar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/05/25 08:17:23 UTC
[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-1674) OpenJPA is not differentiating
between entity types with the same key when I use table per class.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12871012#action_12871012 ]
Pinaki Poddar commented on OPENJPA-1674:
----------------------------------------
> OpenJPA is not differentiating between entity types with the same key when I use table per class.
It does if told to do so:
openjpa.Compatibilty=StrictIdentityValues=true
The attached test will pass with the above config.
> OpenJPA is not differentiating between entity types with the same key when I use table per class.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-1674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1674
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: sql
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Environment: Windows 7 / CentOS 5.4, MySQL 5.1
> Reporter: Christopher Davies
> Attachments: OPENJPA-1674_test.patch
>
>
> OpenJPA is not differentiating between entity types with the same key when I use table per class.
> Here's a snippet of my ode,
> (Department) es.find(Department.class, "N/A");
> (PrintQueue) es.find(PrintQueue.class, "N/A");
> Both Department and PrintQueue entities are based upon the same super class but I use table per class so they are in separate tables.
> As you can see they both have the same key, but if I put the department line 1st the find of the print queue will generate a class cast exception trying to cast a Department to a PrintQueue. If I put the PrintQueue line 1st I will get a class cast exception trying to cast a PrintQueue to a Department. The second find doesn't generate any SQL if I have trace logging turned on so it looks to me that it is a cache issue.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.