You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> on 2014/01/10 03:56:37 UTC
Accumulo 1.4.5 RC0
Devs,
I put together some artifacts for what could tentatively be called 1.4.5
for your testing pleasure.[1]
I'm not calling a vote on this because I know there are several things
missing, but if you could take a few minutes and tell me what _else_ I made
errors on, I would appreciate it.
Missing:
* Signatures
* .deb
* Updated CHANGES file
Thanks,
Mike
[1]: http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/accumulo-1.4.5-rc0/
Re: Accumulo 1.4.5 RC0
Posted by Eric Newton <er...@gmail.com>.
Yes, at least ACCUMULO-1940 (which I upgraded to critical).
-Eric
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Eric Newton <er...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Here are some that I find to be motivating. However, I would still like
> to
> > wait until most of the 1.6.0 long running tests have been run. But if
> > someone else is doing the work, I'm not going to say no.
> >
> > ACCUMULO-1686 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1686
> >loggers
> > die when the zookeeper they are using
> > disconnectsACCUMULO-1800<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1800>delete
> > mutations not working through the
> > ProxyACCUMULO-2037<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2037
> > >Tablets
> > not assigned to last
> > locationACCUMULO-1940<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1940
> > >Data
> > file in !METADATA differs from in memory
> > dataACCUMULO-2112<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2112
> > >master
> > does not balance after intermittent communication failure
> >
>
> Some of these issues have a priority of major. Do you think they should be
> bumped up?
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey+lists@cloudera.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > What are the issues motivating a 1.4.5 release?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I went over some back in the call for 1.4.5 and 1.5.1 last week[1].
> > >
> > > Primarily it's that 1.6.0 is an uncertain amount of time out and both
> of
> > > those branches has a very large number of issues closed against them.
> > >
> > > [1]: http://bit.ly/1ekSqaw
> > >
> >
>
Re: Accumulo 1.4.5 RC0
Posted by Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Eric Newton <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here are some that I find to be motivating. However, I would still like to
> wait until most of the 1.6.0 long running tests have been run. But if
> someone else is doing the work, I'm not going to say no.
>
> ACCUMULO-1686 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1686>loggers
> die when the zookeeper they are using
> disconnectsACCUMULO-1800<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1800>delete
> mutations not working through the
> ProxyACCUMULO-2037<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2037
> >Tablets
> not assigned to last
> locationACCUMULO-1940<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1940
> >Data
> file in !METADATA differs from in memory
> dataACCUMULO-2112<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2112
> >master
> does not balance after intermittent communication failure
>
Some of these issues have a priority of major. Do you think they should be
bumped up?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey+lists@cloudera.com
> >wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > What are the issues motivating a 1.4.5 release?
> > >
> > >
> > I went over some back in the call for 1.4.5 and 1.5.1 last week[1].
> >
> > Primarily it's that 1.6.0 is an uncertain amount of time out and both of
> > those branches has a very large number of issues closed against them.
> >
> > [1]: http://bit.ly/1ekSqaw
> >
>
Re: Accumulo 1.4.5 RC0
Posted by Eric Newton <er...@gmail.com>.
Here are some that I find to be motivating. However, I would still like to
wait until most of the 1.6.0 long running tests have been run. But if
someone else is doing the work, I'm not going to say no.
ACCUMULO-1686 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1686>loggers
die when the zookeeper they are using
disconnectsACCUMULO-1800<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1800>delete
mutations not working through the
ProxyACCUMULO-2037<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2037>Tablets
not assigned to last
locationACCUMULO-1940<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1940>Data
file in !METADATA differs from in memory
dataACCUMULO-2112<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2112>master
does not balance after intermittent communication failure
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
>
> > What are the issues motivating a 1.4.5 release?
> >
> >
> I went over some back in the call for 1.4.5 and 1.5.1 last week[1].
>
> Primarily it's that 1.6.0 is an uncertain amount of time out and both of
> those branches has a very large number of issues closed against them.
>
> [1]: http://bit.ly/1ekSqaw
>
Re: Accumulo 1.4.5 RC0
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> What are the issues motivating a 1.4.5 release?
>
>
I went over some back in the call for 1.4.5 and 1.5.1 last week[1].
Primarily it's that 1.6.0 is an uncertain amount of time out and both of
those branches has a very large number of issues closed against them.
[1]: http://bit.ly/1ekSqaw
Re: Accumulo 1.4.5 RC0
Posted by Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>.
What are the issues motivating a 1.4.5 release?
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Devs,
>
> I put together some artifacts for what could tentatively be called 1.4.5
> for your testing pleasure.[1]
>
> I'm not calling a vote on this because I know there are several things
> missing, but if you could take a few minutes and tell me what _else_ I made
> errors on, I would appreciate it.
>
> Missing:
> * Signatures
> * .deb
> * Updated CHANGES file
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> [1]: http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/accumulo-1.4.5-rc0/
>
Re: Accumulo 1.4.5 RC0
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
I have successfully run the 1.4.5 development branch as of 6593a9 through a
24hr Continuous Ingest test run, with agitation (including HDFS namenode
failover), on a CDH4.5.0 cluster with 5 worker nodes (DN, TT, TS, Logger)
and 2 master nodes in HA (all MR, HDFS, and Accumulo master roles on each
with the exception of the Accumulo Monitor).
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't be ready to consider any release candidate until Randomwalk and
> Continuous Ingest tests are run, both with agitation, for at least a day,
> with more than one tserver (ideally more than one node, too).
>
> That being said, the artifacts are certainly nice to retest. Can you
> publish the Git hash too? Would likely be good once multiple people start
> testing.
>
>
> On 1/9/14, 10:23 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
>
>> Just unit tests against Hadoop 1 and 2 profiles, so far. Wanted to post
>> artifacts so that if other people had slack time they could help verify.
>> On Jan 9, 2014 7:05 PM, "John Vines" <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> What testing has been done?
>>>
>>> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
>>> On Jan 9, 2014 9:57 PM, "Mike Drob" <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Devs,
>>>>
>>>> I put together some artifacts for what could tentatively be called 1.4.5
>>>> for your testing pleasure.[1]
>>>>
>>>> I'm not calling a vote on this because I know there are several things
>>>> missing, but if you could take a few minutes and tell me what _else_ I
>>>>
>>> made
>>>
>>>> errors on, I would appreciate it.
>>>>
>>>> Missing:
>>>> * Signatures
>>>> * .deb
>>>> * Updated CHANGES file
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> [1]: http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/accumulo-1.4.5-rc0/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Accumulo 1.4.5 RC0
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
I wouldn't be ready to consider any release candidate until Randomwalk
and Continuous Ingest tests are run, both with agitation, for at least a
day, with more than one tserver (ideally more than one node, too).
That being said, the artifacts are certainly nice to retest. Can you
publish the Git hash too? Would likely be good once multiple people
start testing.
On 1/9/14, 10:23 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> Just unit tests against Hadoop 1 and 2 profiles, so far. Wanted to post
> artifacts so that if other people had slack time they could help verify.
> On Jan 9, 2014 7:05 PM, "John Vines" <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> What testing has been done?
>>
>> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
>> On Jan 9, 2014 9:57 PM, "Mike Drob" <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Devs,
>>>
>>> I put together some artifacts for what could tentatively be called 1.4.5
>>> for your testing pleasure.[1]
>>>
>>> I'm not calling a vote on this because I know there are several things
>>> missing, but if you could take a few minutes and tell me what _else_ I
>> made
>>> errors on, I would appreciate it.
>>>
>>> Missing:
>>> * Signatures
>>> * .deb
>>> * Updated CHANGES file
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> [1]: http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/accumulo-1.4.5-rc0/
>>>
>>
>
Re: Accumulo 1.4.5 RC0
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>.
Just unit tests against Hadoop 1 and 2 profiles, so far. Wanted to post
artifacts so that if other people had slack time they could help verify.
On Jan 9, 2014 7:05 PM, "John Vines" <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> What testing has been done?
>
> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
> On Jan 9, 2014 9:57 PM, "Mike Drob" <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > Devs,
> >
> > I put together some artifacts for what could tentatively be called 1.4.5
> > for your testing pleasure.[1]
> >
> > I'm not calling a vote on this because I know there are several things
> > missing, but if you could take a few minutes and tell me what _else_ I
> made
> > errors on, I would appreciate it.
> >
> > Missing:
> > * Signatures
> > * .deb
> > * Updated CHANGES file
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
> >
> > [1]: http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/accumulo-1.4.5-rc0/
> >
>
Re: Accumulo 1.4.5 RC0
Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
What testing has been done?
Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
On Jan 9, 2014 9:57 PM, "Mike Drob" <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Devs,
>
> I put together some artifacts for what could tentatively be called 1.4.5
> for your testing pleasure.[1]
>
> I'm not calling a vote on this because I know there are several things
> missing, but if you could take a few minutes and tell me what _else_ I made
> errors on, I would appreciate it.
>
> Missing:
> * Signatures
> * .deb
> * Updated CHANGES file
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> [1]: http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/accumulo-1.4.5-rc0/
>