You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@abdera.apache.org by James M Snell <ja...@gmail.com> on 2008/03/03 08:21:06 UTC
Re: 0.4.0
FYI... my trip to New York last week got extended by a day and I'm a bit
behind schedule on things. I'm planning to get the release branch put
together shortly, maybe even this evening or tomorrow.
- James
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> David Calavera wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:44 PM, James M Snell <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> We've had a few weeks to shake out bugs in the 0.4.0 trunk and a lot of
>>> good fixes have been submitted. I think there are a couple more patches
>>> to commit. I'm thinking that we should target next thursday/friday for
>>> cutting the 0.4.0 branch and building the release candidate. Does that
>>> work for everyone?
>>>
>>> - James
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Sounds good. I'm sure you're absolutely thrilled about this, but I'm
> busy getting Maven in shape right now. You should see some commits today...
> - Dan
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> MuleSource
> http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>
Re: 0.4.0
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
James,
Ant + Apache IVY
- -- dims
James M Snell wrote:
| Yes. While I prefer the Ant build, I'm honestly not sure if I'll have
| the time to keep it updated, especially as we get into more modular
| things like the various adapters and extensions that have diverse
| dependencies. The one advantage maven does have, IMHO, is it's
| dependency management.
|
| - James
|
| Dan Diephouse wrote:
|> Did you see my questions about licenses and NOTICE files in the maven
|> distro email?
|>
|> James M Snell wrote:
|>> FYI... my trip to New York last week got extended by a day and I'm a
|>> bit behind schedule on things. I'm planning to get the release
|>> branch put together shortly, maybe even this evening or tomorrow.
|>>
|>> - James
|>>
|>> Dan Diephouse wrote:
|>>> David Calavera wrote:
|>>>> +1
|>>>>
|>>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:44 PM, James M Snell <ja...@gmail.com>
|>>>> wrote:
|>>>>
|>>>>
|>>>>> We've had a few weeks to shake out bugs in the 0.4.0 trunk and a
|>>>>> lot of
|>>>>> good fixes have been submitted. I think there are a couple more
|>>>>> patches
|>>>>> to commit. I'm thinking that we should target next
|>>>>> thursday/friday for
|>>>>> cutting the 0.4.0 branch and building the release candidate. Does
|>>>>> that
|>>>>> work for everyone?
|>>>>>
|>>>>> - James
|>>>>>
|>>>>>
|>>>>
|>>>>
|>>>>
|>>>>
|>>> Sounds good. I'm sure you're absolutely thrilled about this, but I'm
|>>> busy getting Maven in shape right now. You should see some commits
|>>> today...
|>>> - Dan
|>>>
|>>> --
|>>> Dan Diephouse
|>>> MuleSource
|>>> http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
|>>>
|>
|>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFH0DrBgNg6eWEDv1kRAq+RAKCSuObecqoxZOo9dEtI/eCWTg9feACdGyEi
C0rbps4mwPCdkTzad8pC2gU=
=BatM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: 0.4.0
Posted by James M Snell <ja...@gmail.com>.
Yes. While I prefer the Ant build, I'm honestly not sure if I'll have
the time to keep it updated, especially as we get into more modular
things like the various adapters and extensions that have diverse
dependencies. The one advantage maven does have, IMHO, is it's
dependency management.
- James
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> Did you see my questions about licenses and NOTICE files in the maven
> distro email?
>
> James M Snell wrote:
>> FYI... my trip to New York last week got extended by a day and I'm a
>> bit behind schedule on things. I'm planning to get the release branch
>> put together shortly, maybe even this evening or tomorrow.
>>
>> - James
>>
>> Dan Diephouse wrote:
>>> David Calavera wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:44 PM, James M Snell <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> We've had a few weeks to shake out bugs in the 0.4.0 trunk and a
>>>>> lot of
>>>>> good fixes have been submitted. I think there are a couple more
>>>>> patches
>>>>> to commit. I'm thinking that we should target next thursday/friday
>>>>> for
>>>>> cutting the 0.4.0 branch and building the release candidate. Does
>>>>> that
>>>>> work for everyone?
>>>>>
>>>>> - James
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Sounds good. I'm sure you're absolutely thrilled about this, but I'm
>>> busy getting Maven in shape right now. You should see some commits
>>> today...
>>> - Dan
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dan Diephouse
>>> MuleSource
>>> http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>>>
>
>
Re: 0.4.0
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@mulesource.com>.
Did you see my questions about licenses and NOTICE files in the maven
distro email?
James M Snell wrote:
> FYI... my trip to New York last week got extended by a day and I'm a
> bit behind schedule on things. I'm planning to get the release branch
> put together shortly, maybe even this evening or tomorrow.
>
> - James
>
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
>> David Calavera wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:44 PM, James M Snell <ja...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> We've had a few weeks to shake out bugs in the 0.4.0 trunk and a
>>>> lot of
>>>> good fixes have been submitted. I think there are a couple more
>>>> patches
>>>> to commit. I'm thinking that we should target next thursday/friday
>>>> for
>>>> cutting the 0.4.0 branch and building the release candidate. Does
>>>> that
>>>> work for everyone?
>>>>
>>>> - James
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Sounds good. I'm sure you're absolutely thrilled about this, but I'm
>> busy getting Maven in shape right now. You should see some commits
>> today...
>> - Dan
>>
>> --
>> Dan Diephouse
>> MuleSource
>> http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>>
--
Dan Diephouse
MuleSource
http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com