You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@aurora.apache.org by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> on 2016/01/14 16:02:49 UTC
[PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
Given that we are still playing catch-up to mesos releases (we are on
0.25.0, latest is 0.26.0, there's talk of cutting 0.27.0 soon), i would
like to suggest that we remove these tickets from 0.12.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1150
It's slightly unfortunate as these tickets represent the largest planned
effort for 0.12.0, we had a handful of significant contributions that still
make this a featureful release:
https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/d542bd1d58bc5dcf6ead95d902c0a8cecbbffe9e/NEWS#L3-L23
Additionally, i would like to recommend that we add the following ticket to
0.12.0 since we have an in-fight patch that looks close to completion:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1109
Cheers,
Bill
Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
Posted by Zameer Manji <zm...@apache.org>.
+1
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Joshua Cohen <jc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Sounds good to me.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Erb, Stephan <
> Stephan.Erb@blue-yonder.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for catching up
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: John Sirois <jo...@conductant.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 4:18 PM
> >> To: dev@aurora.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Given that we are still playing catch-up to mesos releases (we are on
> >> > 0.25.0, latest is 0.26.0, there's talk of cutting 0.27.0 soon), i
> would
> >> > like to suggest that we remove these tickets from 0.12.0:
> >> >
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1150
> >> >
> >> > It's slightly unfortunate as these tickets represent the largest
> planned
> >> > effort for 0.12.0, we had a handful of significant contributions that
> >> still
> >> > make this a featureful release:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/d542bd1d58bc5dcf6ead95d902c0a8cecbbffe9e/NEWS#L3-L23
> >> >
> >> > Additionally, i would like to recommend that we add the following
> ticket
> >> to
> >> > 0.12.0 since we have an in-fight patch that looks close to completion:
> >> >
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1109
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 to the proposal, catching up would be good to do.
> >>
> >> I clarified the status of AURORA-987 by stopping progress and
> >> un-assigning. Although I'm working towards that ticket, its by very
> >> indirect means still and I'll re-assign and re-start once I'm actually
> >> engaged in the meat of the API proposal that is needed assuming no one
> else
> >> has dived in.
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > Bill
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> John Sirois
> >> 303-512-3301
> >>
>
> --
> Zameer Manji
>
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
Posted by Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>.
+1
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Joshua Cohen <jc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Erb, Stephan <St...@blue-yonder.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for catching up
>> ________________________________________
>> From: John Sirois <jo...@conductant.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 4:18 PM
>> To: dev@aurora.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Given that we are still playing catch-up to mesos releases (we are on
>> > 0.25.0, latest is 0.26.0, there's talk of cutting 0.27.0 soon), i would
>> > like to suggest that we remove these tickets from 0.12.0:
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1150
>> >
>> > It's slightly unfortunate as these tickets represent the largest planned
>> > effort for 0.12.0, we had a handful of significant contributions that
>> still
>> > make this a featureful release:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/d542bd1d58bc5dcf6ead95d902c0a8cecbbffe9e/NEWS#L3-L23
>> >
>> > Additionally, i would like to recommend that we add the following ticket
>> to
>> > 0.12.0 since we have an in-fight patch that looks close to completion:
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1109
>>
>>
>> +1 to the proposal, catching up would be good to do.
>>
>> I clarified the status of AURORA-987 by stopping progress and
>> un-assigning. Although I'm working towards that ticket, its by very
>> indirect means still and I'll re-assign and re-start once I'm actually
>> engaged in the meat of the API proposal that is needed assuming no one else
>> has dived in.
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> John Sirois
>> 303-512-3301
>>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
Posted by Joshua Cohen <jc...@apache.org>.
Sounds good to me.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Erb, Stephan <St...@blue-yonder.com>
wrote:
> +1 for catching up
> ________________________________________
> From: John Sirois <jo...@conductant.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 4:18 PM
> To: dev@aurora.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Given that we are still playing catch-up to mesos releases (we are on
> > 0.25.0, latest is 0.26.0, there's talk of cutting 0.27.0 soon), i would
> > like to suggest that we remove these tickets from 0.12.0:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1150
> >
> > It's slightly unfortunate as these tickets represent the largest planned
> > effort for 0.12.0, we had a handful of significant contributions that
> still
> > make this a featureful release:
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/d542bd1d58bc5dcf6ead95d902c0a8cecbbffe9e/NEWS#L3-L23
> >
> > Additionally, i would like to recommend that we add the following ticket
> to
> > 0.12.0 since we have an in-fight patch that looks close to completion:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1109
>
>
> +1 to the proposal, catching up would be good to do.
>
> I clarified the status of AURORA-987 by stopping progress and
> un-assigning. Although I'm working towards that ticket, its by very
> indirect means still and I'll re-assign and re-start once I'm actually
> engaged in the meat of the API proposal that is needed assuming no one else
> has dived in.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bill
> >
>
>
>
> --
> John Sirois
> 303-512-3301
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
Posted by "Erb, Stephan" <St...@blue-yonder.com>.
+1 for catching up
________________________________________
From: John Sirois <jo...@conductant.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 4:18 PM
To: dev@aurora.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
> Given that we are still playing catch-up to mesos releases (we are on
> 0.25.0, latest is 0.26.0, there's talk of cutting 0.27.0 soon), i would
> like to suggest that we remove these tickets from 0.12.0:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1150
>
> It's slightly unfortunate as these tickets represent the largest planned
> effort for 0.12.0, we had a handful of significant contributions that still
> make this a featureful release:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/d542bd1d58bc5dcf6ead95d902c0a8cecbbffe9e/NEWS#L3-L23
>
> Additionally, i would like to recommend that we add the following ticket to
> 0.12.0 since we have an in-fight patch that looks close to completion:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1109
+1 to the proposal, catching up would be good to do.
I clarified the status of AURORA-987 by stopping progress and
un-assigning. Although I'm working towards that ticket, its by very
indirect means still and I'll re-assign and re-start once I'm actually
engaged in the meat of the API proposal that is needed assuming no one else
has dived in.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
Posted by John Sirois <jo...@conductant.com>.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
> Given that we are still playing catch-up to mesos releases (we are on
> 0.25.0, latest is 0.26.0, there's talk of cutting 0.27.0 soon), i would
> like to suggest that we remove these tickets from 0.12.0:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1150
>
> It's slightly unfortunate as these tickets represent the largest planned
> effort for 0.12.0, we had a handful of significant contributions that still
> make this a featureful release:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/d542bd1d58bc5dcf6ead95d902c0a8cecbbffe9e/NEWS#L3-L23
>
> Additionally, i would like to recommend that we add the following ticket to
> 0.12.0 since we have an in-fight patch that looks close to completion:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1109
+1 to the proposal, catching up would be good to do.
I clarified the status of AURORA-987 by stopping progress and
un-assigning. Although I'm working towards that ticket, its by very
indirect means still and I'll re-assign and re-start once I'm actually
engaged in the meat of the API proposal that is needed assuming no one else
has dived in.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill
>
--
John Sirois
303-512-3301
Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
Posted by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>.
Thanks for all the input folks, i have made these changes in jira.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org> wrote:
> sounds good, +1
>
> -Jake
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Given that we are still playing catch-up to mesos releases (we are on
> > 0.25.0, latest is 0.26.0, there's talk of cutting 0.27.0 soon), i would
> > like to suggest that we remove these tickets from 0.12.0:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1150
> >
> > It's slightly unfortunate as these tickets represent the largest planned
> > effort for 0.12.0, we had a handful of significant contributions that
> still
> > make this a featureful release:
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/d542bd1d58bc5dcf6ead95d902c0a8cecbbffe9e/NEWS#L3-L23
> >
> > Additionally, i would like to recommend that we add the following ticket
> to
> > 0.12.0 since we have an in-fight patch that looks close to completion:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1109
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bill
> >
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Amend 0.12.0 release goals
Posted by Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org>.
sounds good, +1
-Jake
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
> Given that we are still playing catch-up to mesos releases (we are on
> 0.25.0, latest is 0.26.0, there's talk of cutting 0.27.0 soon), i would
> like to suggest that we remove these tickets from 0.12.0:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1150
>
> It's slightly unfortunate as these tickets represent the largest planned
> effort for 0.12.0, we had a handful of significant contributions that still
> make this a featureful release:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/d542bd1d58bc5dcf6ead95d902c0a8cecbbffe9e/NEWS#L3-L23
>
> Additionally, i would like to recommend that we add the following ticket to
> 0.12.0 since we have an in-fight patch that looks close to completion:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1109
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill
>